Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Flasher Wattage?


hcmpls1

Recommended Posts

So I had posted this in another thread but was hoping to get more responses in a seperate thread.

Sorry for the dumb question but what role does wattage play with flashers? A FL-20 has 400 watts max output and an ICE 55 has 2800 watts max output. 2800 is 7 times greater and I would assume its that much better but is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I googled "wattage in sonar" and found this on a site:

"Power- Sonar power is rated two different ways, peak-to-peak wattage and RMS wattage. The differences and methods of determining these ratings are beyond the scope of this article but be aware to compare the same rating when comparing two or more units. Sonar power determines how deep the sonar can read, how small a target can be and still register and allows the user to see their jig, thermoclines and even determine weed type! Most sonar shoppers buy too little power. If you really want to see bait fish, subtle changes in bottom composition, and fish close to the bottom, more power is necessary. As a rule the minimum power ratings are about 1500 watts peak-to-peak and about 250 watts RMS."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need all that power because the transducer on a vex is so sensitive it doesn't need more power. Every other company tries to dup.the transducer but cant and they need more power to make up for it. of course this is what I was told by top vexilar reps.There is a reason companys try to copy vex! sure a lx-5 is good ,and the new birds are good but they are built around the concept of the vexilars original flasher. Not going into the ford /chevy thing just pick one and fish!IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, all the extra wattage that Marcum and all those companies have simply uses more battery

My Bird ICE 35 lasts longer than my Vex FL8 ever did, so that statement is not true. Maybe the Vex would last longer if it had new, up-to-date electronic components in it like the Bird and the Marcum, instead of the high current draw components of the 1980's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only certainty with generating more WATTS, is you use more power to accomplish it.

Beyond that the processor and other favors have a larger impact on performance than anything else.

For many years the predominant thinking was "more watts = more performance", but that thinking has since changed.

Lowrance for instance over time jacked up the watts used into the mid to upper 1000's, and now redesigned the whole operating system to operate on 250W Peak to Peak (31W RMS), but vastly improved the processors and memory capacity to accomplish this.

High Watt output has it's use in some specialized sonar applications, but you have to ask yourself if is it appropriate and efficient to the task, and/or truly necessary for the application in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: MN Greenheads
Thinking bout it is like splitting hairs, they all work well. Put your time into finding fish.

Very true. Wattage was the last thing on my list when I decided to buy a new flasher.

I asked the question because wattage seems to be one of the key features everyone highlights, but Vexilar... I dont have a flasher and dont know a lot about them. Obviously one would assume all of the flashers work but when you've never had one and looking to spend money on one you want to make sure youre not spending too little or too much for something you may or may not need.

Thanks for the responses everyone. Your insight helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Receiver technology has just exploded over the last 20 years, and not just in fishing electronics.

Higher transmitted power used to be necessary. Receivers had a lot of natural background noise that the returning signal needed to be strong enough to overcome the noise threshold.

Airborne weather radar transceivers in the 70's and early 80's often had transmitted powers of 15,000-20,000 watts. In the early 80's as receiver technology advanced, it dropped to 1,000 to 5,000 watts. They still used big tube magnetrons to develop this energy. Bulky, expensive, noisy and a short life.

Now, they use solid state pin diodes on the order of 25-50 watts, with long life and much reduced current needs.

Its been simply amazing to see how far the technology has advanced, especially in fishing electronics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a low power flasher and when I'm fishing in 35' of water I can watch the bead for my bobber stop slide all the way down to my jig when not using a bobber. If I were fishing 120' of water I might want more power but the deepest lake that I fish is only 40'. When it comes to target separation, it might be nice if I were fishing for Guppies. I have been using this unit for a long time and it does everything that I need it to and I know what it is telling me. I'm not about to spend $400+ for more power as long as my flasher works for me. I guess it is each to his own choosing, but I sure get tired of this my dog is better than your dog stuff that goes on on some forums. If this flasher ever gives up on me, I'll see what is availaable at that time. blush

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.