Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
schmoe147

Finishing Basement

8 posts in this topic

I'm thinking about finishing my basement 54x24. It would be all open so the only thing needed would be the outside walls. Just wondering what something like this would run approximately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That will be hard to answer. Before we start what about receptacles, lighting, phone jacks, TV, computer, bracing for interior walls in the future, insulation, closets, windows, duct work for heating and return vents, or additional heating, ceiling, plumbing, adding a bathroom in the future along with plumbing, ventilation. Some of those things can be roughed in now, that'll save time, a mess and a cash in the future.

Are you doing this work yourself or getting bids?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you doing it yourself or having it done? Big difference in price.

Keep in mind that you have to frame it, insulate it and then sheetrock it. Carpet and wiring as well. Are you putting in a bathroom or anything?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am working on a similar project and have gotten materials prices from Menards and a spray foam contractor. I contacted the city and got some ideas on what they woud require to meet the code. You need a minimum of R10 according to the code folks.

A spray foam comany quoted $1.90 a square foot for R14 or 2 inches of foam. The pink polywhatever stuff is $19.74 a sheet for R10. The spray foam guy said there is an issue of permiability and that code requires that it be less than 1 and his quote was a .8. I assume that means that the 2 inch pink foam doesn't get below 1 but I'm not sure. The spray foam guy said to build the walls with a 1 inch space from the block, do the plumbing and wiring and the have him foam it, and then put up the rock. Of course the spray foam cuts down on time so if you're hiring out anything you have to figure in that savings as well.

Using some really rough numbers the pink foam would cost about $500 vs $1550 for the spray, studs and treated for the plates would run about $225 and the rock would be about $225 for the 103 linear feet of outside wall we are working with. I suspect the savings on the labor if spray foam was used would be maybe $300.

I haven't done anything to figure out the ceiling yet. Suspended vs rocked, painted rock vs sprayed. Lots to think about concerning future access, cost to repair when water starts to come through 4 years from now, stuff like that.

The choices you make for doors will make a huge difference. A cheap mahogany door was only $40 and a 6 panel solid oak door was $140. Lighting choices are really variable. The wire, boxes, switches and outlets can be calculated with some accuracy - get the prices and do a layout and work the numbers.

It only took me an hour or so to go to the big box and price materials and then not much work to crunch a few numbers. I added 15% to each calculation just because you can't cut it that close.

There also is the flooring. There is a chipboard product with a plastic web on the bottom so moisture isn't an issue but it cost $6.78 for a 2' x 2' panel or over $50 for a 4x8 area. There was also a 4X8 sheet of some chipboard that was shown to be an underlayment and it was only $19 a sheet. I don't know what the differences are or what the code says but obviously the price difference is huge.

You can do this yourself using suppliers in your area. You probably should also get some bids from contractors to see how it works out that way. Lots of things to consider before you spend any money or buy anything.

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing that is very important is to not skip out on a good, quality drywall contractor. It is possible you could hang the rock yourself, but if your not a taper or a sprayer or a sander you will never get your walls and ceilings to look right, forcing you to stare at disgusting walls every time you are down there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing that is very important is to not skip out on a good, quality drywall contractor. It is possible you could hang the rock yourself, but if your not a taper or a sprayer or a sander you will never get your walls and ceilings to look right, forcing you to stare at disgusting walls every time you are down there.

Here here, great advice. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned earlier the spray foam contractor talked about a code requirement on permiablity and stressed that his product met the code. I don't know if the 2 inch pink foam meets this requirement or not. Anyone know if it does, and what that is all about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: DREZLER
One thing that is very important is to not skip out on a good, quality drywall contractor. It is possible you could hang the rock yourself, but if your not a taper or a sprayer or a sander you will never get your walls and ceilings to look right, forcing you to stare at disgusting walls every time you are down there.

Here here, great advice. smile

Yep, learned this the hard way! It just takes a little longer to get it looking right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors