Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tisosy11

Ice Castle condensation/moisture?

15 posts in this topic

I was wondering how well the ice castles hold out the elements. I've been in fishhouses that seem damp at the corners and seams of the insulation.

Do the ice castly fish houses stay insulated pretty good or can you feel moisture?

I am thinking about purchasing an ice castle but have heard some pos and negs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You will get what you pay for. Comparison shop with other brands and then choose. Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also looking at purchasing an Ice Castle before next ice season. I took some time and went threw all the FM (and other sites) posts during the winter months from the last few years. I looked for anything that said wheelhouse or similar. There is some very good information out there that I have really learned from. I also have talked to quite a few folks at bars, restaurants, ice show, ect.

Thanks for starting this topic I will be monitoring.

Matt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like stated above, you can do a search and find a lot of information. Ive got a 6.5 X 12 ice castle and love it! Is it the best/highest quality house out there? Nope, but it got me a lot more features that I wanted for a much lower price. A lot of the things inside the house are built cheap and if you go and look at some im sure you'll see what I mean. I dont think cheap is necesarily bad either, alot of the thing that are built cheap also mean they were build lighter which is nice for a fish house. I didnt need high class solid oak cabinets! Overall if you are looking for the strongest fish house with highly detailed work and you dont have to worry too much about price you would probably be better pleased looking at some of the other manufacturers and spending more $$$. Although I have seen some of the higher end Ice Castle stuff and some of them are very nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I understand the whole you get what you pay for...but would like to here from owners. Does their house feel damp in the corners, is there any outside leakage.

Just curious...I hope to purchase a house sometime this spring if the deals right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that alot of people get cuaght up on the "Ice Castle" name. They do a great job of marketing, and they deserve credit for that. I would recommend, however, that you take a look at some other manufacturers. I was looking at the websites the other day for Performance Engineering, Mille Lacs Customs, and even Distinct Builders (The Lodge). There's alot of really good stuff out there for pretty reasonable prices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and to answer your actual question, I have never been in a fish house that didn't have condensation problems. One would pobobly notice it more in some ice castles because of the paneling they use. It is cheap and it absorbs water... especially where the studs are because the wall is colder there, and on the seams because the water can "wick" into the paneling there. I'm no scientist but a fish house is a confined, wet, space that always seems to create condensation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never noticed condensation in any of the ice castles that ice have been in. Doesn't mean that there wasn't any.....I usually look around the house that I am in I just haven't noticed that problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 6.5' x 14' and have not seen a condensation problem yet. I keep a window cracked to relieve some of it, it also keeps the windows defogged. I purchased mine 1.5 years ago and have pulled it 450 miles round trip many times without any problems.

I agree with the ice Castle being a little cheaper, but it depends what you are looking for. Ice castle had the floor plan I wanted and for a great price. I looked at the Lodge, but would have paid 4 grand more. King Crow looked even cheaper and their floor plans didn't work for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an 8x18 Ice Castle and haven't had any problems in 5 years with any condensation, I don't care if it has cheap paneling, it's light and it looks just fine. My ice castle stays warm and comfortable and I've spent a lot of time in it. Like planning any big purchase, you should always shop around so you get just what you want. Use your own experiences and observations to steer your purchase and you likely won't go wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we have a 8x18 and the only time we get ice build up in the corners is when it sits on the lake for a few weeks with out any use to warm it up. also some of the ice the builds up in the corners has alot to do with the auger throwing slush in there and feezing. i had some condensation in there once this year and that was when it was on the lake for 2 weeks without anyone in it when it was -30... for my needs i love that fish house. i can always upgrade the inside as i want but for now i just like the space, tv, warmth, and being able to cook a meal inside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I installed a vent free heater in a former ice house. (the vent free heater is a good Back up when batteries fail in forced air furnace) I had TONS of condensation in that house and it was an ICE PRO. You need a vent and a way to move air around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been in plenty of fish houses and built 3 myself. If they are insulated right, house wrapped and have a Direct Vent furnace, they will NOT sweat!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors