Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
yakfisher

Mallard Comparison

15 posts in this topic

Here are a couple I took today. Let me know what you think of images A and B, the crops and please let me know which one you like best and why. These are the same bird taken moments apart. Also, let me know if you feel these are over saturated. Thanks for your input--Yak

Image A

malldrake1.jpg

Image B

malldrake2.jpg

One extra one for fun.

malltrio.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like No. 2 the best. All are sharp, all are nicely colored without being oversaturated, but I like the comp best in No. 2, and the water dribbling down off the mallard's bill is very easy to see against the dark background.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Steve. I've said this before, and for some reason mallards are difficult to "get right". Should be an easy bird to do, but I struggle with them. You've done very well with these.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the second as well. The first is a bit soft, looks like the focus is on the back and with the shallow DOF the beak and eyes are just a bit soft.

The head turn and the water dripping off the bill and just a bit more canvas room make the second work for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked at this post three times now, and I would have to agree with the others. I think the angle of the head is a little better in the second one, and is a sharper. Both my flat screen monitor and my laptop screen show a good color tone that is not too saturated.

I like the bonus shot as well. Typical of the females to shy away from the camera. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant to put this in my initial post but forgot.

You may want to try warming them up a bit by going into levels and dropping the blue channel a bit, or if they were shot RAW by warming up the color temp on the RAW preview screen.

They look a bit cool on my monitor, but that could simply be a slight difference in monitors. Anyway, if you take a minute to compare warmer and cooler, you might find that you prefer it a little warmer. Or maybe not. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Steve, they look a bit cool on my monitor as well, not unusual when shooting around all that water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to vote for photo B also, I think that A looks a little confusing between the bill and the water. Photo A has a better angle in my opinion that clears this up.

Thanks

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input all. Here is what the camera shot, and one that is not as cool as the one that I posted at 4800 degrees. Let me know what you think of these. Thanks.

as shot at 6050 degrees

mall6050_edited-1.jpg

adjusted to 5400 degrees

Mall5400.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the first one best among these last two, yak, but I have always leaned toward warmth rather than coolness, so my opinion reflects that bias. IMO, both are better as far as color temp than the initial image.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like "B" best, I think with living things, they need room in the photo tp move. "A" seems he is too cramped, nowhere to swim, at least that is my impression. Also, I like the warmer tones in your latest editions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice Yak. If I had to choose I would also choose #2 with the warmer tones. I think I would like it cropped horizontally but not as tight as #2, just because of the horizontal lines created by the ripples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input guys. These were shot on an overcast day with pretty thick clouds as the light was fading. I cooled them off a bit I guess because that is how I remembered the afternoon. The gray clouds reflecting off the water and the cool breeze that was blowing. I didn't want the picture to feel to warm and inviting. I definitely appreciate all of your thoughts and suggestions, on anything I post here, it is how I will grow as an artist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cooled them off a bit I guess because that is how I remembered the afternoon. The gray clouds reflecting off the water and the cool breeze that was blowing. I didn't want the picture to feel to warm and inviting.

And that's really the most important thing. Any of us can critique an image and say what we'd like to see, but it's the intent of the photographer/artist that is the final authority.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's really the most important thing. Any of us can critique an image and say what we'd like to see, but it's the intent of the photographer/artist that is the final authority.

Exactly, everything is just the suggestion from another artist and how they see it or would do it. I definitely like that kind of input. It gives me the perspective I need to grow, especially from those who have more experience and expertise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I have two decoy jig sticks that just slip in between the rods and 'canvas' on the roof.  A fish can pull some line off it hits hard.  A Velcro loop can be added for additional security.   There are more custom ways of doing it but that works for me.
    • I'll betcha the camera doesn't survive the summer.   And I clean my weeds off and the pull the plug too without grumbling.
    • I know...   It was a joke...   This is Sillytown (capital S)...     I did check to see if the article was legit though.
    • Hoont Robust Electronic Rodent Trap - Clean and Humane Extermination of Mice, Rats and Squirrels [UPGRADED VERSION] by Hoont 4.9 out of 5 stars 37 customer reviews   Want it Saturday, Dec. 10? Order within 2 hrs 18 mins and choose Two-Day Shipping at checkout. Details Sold by Four Corners Dist. and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available. EASY TO USE– Simply plug in the device with the provided adapter or insert batteries, apply a small amount of bait, such as peanut butter, etc., then place the Hoont™ Electronic Rat Trap at the desired location and power it on. The Electronic Rat Trap will emit a 7000V shock when a rodent enters into the trap, instantly killing the rodent. New more powerful upgraded version. ADVANCED SMART DETECTION TECHNOLOGY – The Hoont™ Electronic Rat Trap is equipped with advanced rodent detection technology, which ensures that rats and all other rodents get instantly killed, without any possibility of escaping. Works for Mice, Rats, Squirrels, Chipmunks and other similar rodents. ULTRA HUMANE - The Hoont™ Electronic Rat Trap kills the rodents as quickly and humanely as possible. It works by emitting a 7000V electric shock, which instantly kills the rodent, with virtually no pain to the rodent. SAFE & NO MESS – Get rodent free without the use of dangerous poisons and chemicals / Discarding the rodent is a breeze with absolutely no mess. No blood and no touching of dead rodents; to discard the exterminated rodent, simply pick up the device, slide the dead rodent into the trash bin and place the trap back to its location ready for its next catch. / Dimensions: 11” x 4.5” x 5” PLUG-IN or BATTERIES - The Hoont™ Electronic Rat Trap comes with a 5 Ft. plug-in adapter for hassle free unlimited kills. Can also be operated with 4 ‘D’ batteries (batteries not included), allowing up to 30+ kills per set of batteries. / Features also an extension plugin- indicator light for hard-to-reach areas, that enables to check for trapped rodents without the need to check the actual device. / Upgraded parts for enhanced performance. There are cheaper options but I thought you guys would prefer the good one.... It will even catch dinner for reb.     I think that 110 isn't going to do it for rodents.   This baby has 7000 volts...  
    • If you install a ventless heater please list me as a beneficiary on your life insurance policy
    • This is silly town.  It was a joke, although on a stand alone basis the article was pretty interesting.   If it was an actual discussion item it would have been posted in one of the hunting forums. 
    • I oppose all that camera stuff, with auto ticketing.   How will the camera tell if there is water in my live well?  Or in my minnow bucket?  Will it focus on the plug as I drive into the parking lot?     I also oppose the red light cameras and speed cameras.  What's next?  Drones following us around? 
    • Must be a hell of a good camera and lens. And no, I follow the rules now as they are written. 
  • Our Sponsors