Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Nathan's gotta go


Kyle Sandberg

Recommended Posts

I cringe when Nathan comes in for a non-save situation. But when the game is on the line, there is no one else on the team I'd rather have go out there.

Neshek is the closer of the future, but right now, its Nathan all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree that Nathan has not been as lights out as he had been the previous the past couple of years, but I don't think I want see him traded and Neshek placed in the closer role. I think Neshek is very valuable in the role that the Twins have used him over the last year. You can count on him coming in late in a game and holding a lead for one inning plus. I think if Neshek is moved to the closer role and Nathan we would be VERY THIN in the pen. The only other middle man I have any faith in is Guerrier who deserves a lot of credit thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nathan has been nothing but solid since arriving to the Twins. The problem with the franchise is not the pitching, hitting, coaching or the GM. It's the ownership. They got their stadium and now it's time to pay up. We are not a small market team. We are a mid market team with one of the richest owners in sports. Don't let yourself be brainwashed by the idea that we can't afford keep Santana, Hunter, Nathan, and Morneau. Nathan is one of the top 3 closers in Baseball and should be paid like it. Johan was exactly right. There comes a time when we need to stop looking at the future and worry about right now. With an additional bat or 2 and the current lineup we could contend next year. If they let 2 of the 4 guys listed above go in the next 2 years I will be extremely upset with the poooooor Polads. If this team is such a burden SELL IT!!! I think most fans are willing to deal with a few lean rebuilding years as long as the ownership is willing to spend the cash when we've got a shot. Now is our chance SPEND THE $$$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 10 or top 3 he gets the job done. If we move Neshek to closer who takes Neshek's spot? The bullpen is not what it once was. Rincon and the rest of them suck. Why get rid of what works? Keep what works and add some help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Nathan must go to sign Santana simple as that. Check this ESPN article out.


Geez your just like a politician Sled make up your mind you originally wanted him gone because you didn't think he was any good or he was doing a poor job now you spin it that he needs to go to sign Santana using an article that states the reason being Nathan is as DOMINANT in his own way as Santana is.

Make up your mind please.... grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

MLB badly needs a salary cap or something similar


Never happen though. All contracts would be declared null and void to make that happen- lawsuits and probably a permanent strike would ensue and MLB couldn't afford that. We have to face facts that team owners like Pohlad do have the money to sign big names, they just won't do it- they'd lose money every year. Minnesota fills seats in sept-oct during post season, but in the middle of may against the Devil Rays or Royals, the place is 3/4 empty. I really can't wait until this new roof-less stadium opens- in april that place will be a ghost town unless the weathers really nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.