Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare


LMITOUT

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's what I was thinking. It's either too much of the same old things or now its, whoa this is too different. Im sure Ill get it at some point but probably wont be at midnight. I played Ghosts far less than any other COD title since MW1, this series needs a big makeover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I was thinking. It's either too much of the same old things or now its, whoa this is too different. Im sure Ill get it at some point but probably wont be at midnight. I played Ghosts far less than any other COD title since MW1, this series needs a big makeover.

Everyone says it needs a makeover, something totally new.

Why? It's Call of Duty. You run around different maps and shoot people.

If they put something new into the game, 1/2 the people ***ch "what a stupid gimmick!".

Look at this year with the booster packs. Everyone here says " what's with the stupid super jump?!?!".

If you want something new, play Battlefield, play Titanfall, play NHL 15 or get some buddies together, and design whatever game you want.

I guess I just don't understand the constant yearly complaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of having futuristic weapons, and super hero powers, how about keeping in life like. Make it replicate Vietnam war, since they already have done the WW@. How about have different maps for some of the more well known wars. Civil war, WW1, the French revolution, ect...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about have different maps for some of the more well known wars. Civil war, WW1, the French revolution, ect...

Probably because futuristic weapons and super hero powers will sell more games than spending half your time standing there packing your muzzleloader so you can get that one shot off again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are crazy. If they make the same old style game with a few new weapons and maps you guys will say, "Im not paying $60 for the same old game, all they did is just add some new guns and maps. Its just a $60 map pack. Boring!" Seriously, thats probably been said verbatim in the COD thread. People complain how bored they were with the recent titles, it gets changed, and now people want the status quo COD title?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically, y'all are saying you want the same game as past games cuz you liked the play style, you just want it to be different...ok. No one wants a video game without automatic weapons, scoped rifles & things that explode. People want either current or futuristic weapons, which rules out a ww or Korean/Vietnam War game. It's too soon for an OEF game. Basically, this was their only option without rehashing the exact same games. As much as y'all will b* & moan, it'll be another record setter & so will next November. Either move on to a new game or quit playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are crazy. If they make the same old style game with a few new weapons and maps you guys will say, "Im not paying $60 for the same old game, all they did is just add some new guns and maps. Its just a $60 map pack. Boring!"

How about a new graphics engine instead of the same warmed-over Quake engine they've been using year after year after year?

Nope, let's add exoskeletons that allow players to jump around like a bunch of idiots (and they will) and guns that print their own bullets. smirk

Talk about mailing it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grwat idea. Instead of creating maps where there's open areas, choke points, etc, make it completely realistic. I would love to try a few maps that were actually in the woods/jungle, not just on paths that wind through the trees. Urban environments where you can access all the floors & rooms of the homes. Also, I've always though that in hc mode, if you get shot in the leg, you shouldnt be able to run. Or if you take one to the arm, you drop your primary & switch to a pistol with your other arm. Maybe make it a new game mode. Just some ideas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go back to the post about Vietnam, Korea, even Osama's "bunker".

All of these are, or have battlefields that SHOULD be able to be incorporated into the game.

Have real life places that the battle takes place in.

You could go back to Vietnam, Revolutionary War, Civil War, all of those and make maps of battlefields.

BUT..... again, those are just maps. And once you do those maps, you only have new maps.

Honestly, I think it'll go the way of Rock Band and Guitar Hero.

Rock Band brought out the keyboard and it was a flop. But other than just putting out new songs, what could they do?

I think you've seen your limit. Even if they brought in vehicles (somewhat did with the remote car). World at War had tanks, you can earn choppers. People will still think the players that get those are hacking or glitching, you'll still have people that complain about nerfed guns, or lag.

It is what it is. Don't want to buy it? Don't. You want to buy it because you have the extra $60 + tax to spend on it, go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go put in COD4 and then put in Ghosts and tell me if there is a difference.

You always beat around the bush, avoid questions, and give vague answers. MW was ground breaking in it's gameplay that's why you think it was so amazing. Essentially they are all running on the same engine are they not? You say you want the engine changed because that's the problem then bring up an old version of the game? Im lost. Ghosts runs far smoother than MW did. I dont get the lag, rarely have to deal any sort of host migration. Both had hacks, every game has hackers. The game just needs new ideas incorporated into its gameplay. Ill pass judgement on this title after Ive played it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha I expected nothing less from you. I simply pointed out how negative you are towards everything. I asked what you thought could help the game? You want the engine overhauled. Okay. I asked why you thought that would benefit the gameplay. You mention an old version of the series using the same engine. hmmm, seems legit.

Master troll, Lmitout, everyone. Even trolls himself, spending days of his life playing games that are all so boring and gimicky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
'Call Of Duty: Advanced Warfare' Will Feature Brand-New Engine

Anyone who thought that the Call of Duty game engine has started to show its age will finally, at long last, be getting a reprieve. The series ran the same (albeit improved) engine throughout the entirety of the Xbox 360/ PS3 generation, and those fans that notice this sort of thing took that as one of the biggest problems with the series — that Activision was essentially re-skinning the same game over and over. Sledgehammer Games’ Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is the first title in the series built specifically for the Xbox One and PS4, and it’s going to be powered by brand-new tech.

“We’ve had two and a half years to create brand-new tech to control and support this game,” Sledgehammer audio director Don Veca told Game Informer. “It’s something like 10 times the memory since this is next-gen. With all this extra memory and new mixing technology, we don’t have to compress everything. We can make things longer and let them breathe.”

Since this article was posted, numerous reports have said that it is not a new engine but rather just another dollop of new frosting on the same old cake. Remember, they claimed a new engine was coming for Ghosts and that never materialized either.

Anything to keep that cash register ringing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.