Jump to content

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

2 Swans Dead (Stupid People)

Recommended Posts

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) officials report that two trumpeter swans were recently killed during two separate incidents on Sept. 25, which was opening weekend of the 2004 waterfowl hunting season.

Conservation Officer Rick Reller, Buffalo, investigated a Turn In Poachers (TIP) call about two individuals - one adult and one juvenile - who had shot a trumpeter swan on Millstone Lake in Wright County. Reller charged both individuals with shooting a protected non-game migratory bird. The hunters also received written warnings for taking waterfowl before legal shooting hours and setting decoys more than one hour before legal shooting hours. The adult hunter also received a written warning for taking a migratory waterfowl with a shotgun capable of holding more than three shells.

The other incident occurred on Nelson Lake in Aitkin County. Conservation Officer Mike Scott, Brookston, received a TIP call where several hunters had witnessed a person shoot and kill an adult female trumpeter swan. The individual told the officer that he was sure that he shot a snow goose, not a trumpeter swan. Scott charged the suspect with shooting a trumpeter swan and seized the hunter's license and firearms in accordance with the new gross over-limit law. The hunter faces restitution charges of $1,000 for killing the swan as well as other criminal charges. The swan will be donated to an area high school in Aitkin for educational purposes.

The trumpeter swan is a threatened species. According to the new law, people who shoot them face fines up to $3,000, possible loss of their shotguns and hunting licenses and restitution charges of $1000. Hunters who shoot and kill a trumpeter swan will lose their small game and waterfowl hunting privileges for three years upon conviction.

The DNR urges anyone with information regarding swan-shooting incidents to call the TIP Hotline at 1-800-652-9093.

Steve Kittelson, DNR Trumpeter Swan Restoration Project leader, said Minnesota's flock of trumpeter swans now consists of more than 1,500 adult swans and approximately 400 young of the year, called cygnets.

"These free-flying birds could show up virtually anywhere in the state," Kittelson said. "To avoid accidentally shooting a swan during the waterfowl season, hunters must learn the differences in both size and markings between protected swans and legal ducks and geese."

Kittelson said swans are three to four times the size of a Canada goose. The all-white adult swans and the light gray cygnets are much larger than geese and have much longer necks equal to their body lengths. The much smaller Canada goose has a distinctive black head with white cheek patches and its neck is only half of its body length. Snow geese are white but have black wing tips and have much shorter necks than swans.

"Trumpeter swans usually travel in small family groups of two adults and two or six cygnets. In contrast, geese usually travel in larger flocks of up to 100 birds," Kittelson said.

The trumpeter swan disappeared from Minnesota in the 1880s. Restoration efforts began in Minnesota with the release of 40 swans by Hennepin Parks (Three Rivers Park District) in the late 1960s.

The DNR Nongame Wildlife Program joined the effort in 1982 to accelerate the restoration and have successfully released more than 300 trumpeter swans. Kittelson urges hunters to be sure of their targets and help ensure the safety of these magnificent birds in Minnesota.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy was totally illegal. No plug in gun, shooting before time, early decoys. Very sad situation. I hunt early goose about 5 miles from this lake. We had two swans land in our decoys out in the field. Was one of the sweetest things I have ever seen hunting. I couldn't believe how big they were being only 10 feet away. They made the honkers we shot look like teal.

[This message has been edited by duckbill (edited 10-07-2004).]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I crack up every year it's the same story "I thought it was a snow goose!"...morons. Lake I hunt in NC minnesota has a family on it and it's a duck lake not a fishing lake. Great birds to watch and can't say they haven't come into the dekes through the fog and freaked us out but for the love of god hold your fire until you know what your target is, Isn't that one of the 10 commandments of gun safety or don't they teach that anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever heard of reading the regulations? People like this don't deserve the opportunity to hunt. mad.gif

Written warnings? I hope the CO took everything they had in possession!!!

[This message has been edited by ChuckN (edited 10-07-2004).]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is pathetic.........the Top guy gets off mostly with Written Warnings even though he is COMPLETELY illegal. Where as guy #2 gets a major fine??? And of course he claims he shot a snow goose, sure he's wrong. But from the post he at least (only) shot the Swan.....which I'm not saying isn't bad. But he did this and got whacked, the other guy did a bunch more and Nothing!

Tight Lines,
My Sponsors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • If you fish the river it could. Ive done it and seen it done multple times. Hit a log that is.
    • could that happen???? yea probably, but unlikely.   i've been chopping or helped or watched cutting spearchucking holes since i've been about 8-10 years old, i'm 65 now, and never remotely seen it happen. ''closest i came was cut a spearhouse hole, plopped the house over it and ended up with a deadhead right smack in the middle of it. the top of the log about 4 ft below the ice!!!!!! 
    • That would be nice til you caught a log frozen in the ice and broke both your arms and your back.
    • Screw your little toy e-augers and chain saws!  😏  😆          
    • the wife and I took a little drive to Arkansas for one more ride. 
    • I get where your coming from Leech. There are some gray areas and loopholes and they know how to work them. These youtube people they want you to be angry, it all plays right into their revenue.   The thing with these youtubers is they unfortunately  have a mass following and they will tell all their fans to show up at the DNR offices, court house, call the office phones etc. And it just drives up their following, youtube views etc. and the result is just more revenue for the youtube channel and people get sucked right in (myself included). Like I said love him or hate him he's generating significant income by doing it and its like a bad car wreck you just cant look away.    In some cases the DNR getting involved the risk outweighs the reward if you get my drift. look at the crowds that came out for him over a misdemeanor jet ski fine in TN. It looks like its straight out of the movie "Time to kill" lol:   More:  
    • Another reply from the DNR Capt.  Sounds like their a bit afraid to dig in and get what the need to prosecute.   Mr. Beeeped-out  😉 I do want to thank you for your time in researching and sending us the information.  The second video in particular involves the CBoyz near Cormorant Village in Becker County.  If you watch many of their videos they are full of violations.  We have met with the County Attorney’s Office and we have been told that unless we can provide a date/time of the actual event they will decline to prosecute.  We have identified many of the players in these videos but only have a date/time of the video release and not the actual date and time.  We have also made contact with them and taken enforcement action in many of their videos.  They are not afraid to film our officers in action.  In addition the first video was a year or two old if I recall.  I will not disagree that when looking at the video there is areas of concern but unless we can observe the damage and be able to testify in court that the wetland was damaged we would likely not be successful in prosecution.  We will continue to monitor their activity and if observed causing damage we will be taking enforcement action.  We appreciate and share your concerns.  If you have any additional information please forward to us.  Capt. Seefeldt   These Jackwads!    
  • Topics

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.