Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Kenseth, big penatly along with Gibb's and crew chief


Recommended Posts

I have no idea if they could gain some performance from what they did or did not do.

So, your saying it's ok to do it to one rod but not all of them?

Well then, how about if we lighten up the brake rotors on one side and not the other? Only did part of them so it should be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea if they could gain some performance from what they did or did not do. I have no idea if you could gain hp from that change, I am not a engineer.

So, your saying it's ok to do it to one rod but not all of them?

Well then, how about if we lighten up the brake rotors on one side and not the other? Only did part of them so it should be ok.

They BROKE the rules and will have top pay like all the rest, that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say they need to check thier parts better before they are installed in thier motors. Otherwise, the penalties will continue.

I agree gregg the penatly was stiff but maybe NASCAR is getting tired of the stretching of the rules and has decided to penalize them a bit more to stop the pushing of the rules so far.

Only my guess.

I know the shop that builds or modified motors check everything before they are installed if the rules has a measurement on that part. The last thing a driver wants is to be fined or DQed due to a rule infraction espeically if the infraction was not a performance gain. Sometimes it happens and did to Matt and his team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, your saying it's ok to do it to one rod but not all of them?

Well then, how about if we lighten up the brake rotors on one side and not the other? Only did part of them so it should be ok.

They BROKE the rules and will have top pay like all the rest, that simple.

Yeah, pretty much. Not sure that lightening a brake rotor would be an equivalent comparison, but I get your thought process.

The thing is with the motor is there has to be tight tolerances and any harmonics at the RPMs they pull and blammo. You cannot have one out of 8 cylinders off by that much and expect it to hold together. 1 brake rotor lighter? That could be an advantage on a track like daytona, but not so much on Richmond or Bristol.

I also think that MWR got hosed a bit because of a part failure with Truex's car. I mean, a shock busted and they get docked because "Too low". Thats splitting hairs I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the motor builders know they have tight tolerances, how does a rod weighing less than the others get in the motor. Oversight probably.

But how does tech,tech the ride height when the shock is broke? There is a minimum for the ride height in post race tech and they have to pass tech.

I understand what you are saying but a team could start out with a lower ride height and then if the shock broke, they could still pass terch saying the shock caused it.

I saw in a national go kart race a guy faster than H$ll. Almost to fast. All these motors are tore down all the way and each part is teched to the rules. let's say the guy knew he was illegal and the last few laps he reached back to the carb screws, which they can do and leaned the motor way out. Motor would not survive. Now we are in tech and there is no running motor to tech as it blew up. Do you let him go as the motor blew or do you say sorry, you cannot be terched as you blew up. The answer is, DQed as no motor to tech. Racers all find a way to cheat oif they want to so a milion rules have been put in place to keep the playing field as even as possible. Bout the same as a broken shock, it stinks but it is the rules.

I am sure if NASCAR allowed this, some teams would get it all figured out.

The drivers have brought on all these rules as over the years, teams always find a new way to bend the rules and try to get away with it. if NASCAR now says, oh well, there was no intent, boy would that open a new can of worms.

I have seen guys get dqed for to much piston pop up. Like 1 thousanth of an inch. Motors can build up carbon on top of the piston so when you build the motor, you have to leave enough clearance so when teched, you allowed for the carbon on top of the piston or you will be Dqed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are they spose to take the motors apart when they get them from TRD

and weigh everthing?

Exactly! What is typically done when they get the motors? Tear them down and inspect everything? Or drop them into the car? I was listening to prerace interviews and a few were saying it was a roll of the dice on which team which motor. So from the sounds of it any team could have wound up with the light conrod. I guess if normal protocol is to just drop an engine into a car without a complete teardown then I can't see why such a harsh penalty.

BTW..I am by no means a Kenseth or Rousch fan, I just don't like seeing things like this that can completely screw up a teams season if it clearly wasn't intentional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that they'll reduce the points penalties (maybe completely) and uphold the monetary fines...possibly the suspensions too.

From what I've read TRD ships the engines across the country to Gibbs and Waltrip and they bolt them in. They don't have access to the inside of the engines whatsoever and, as CAMAN said, it's basically random which car they go into. The engine in question could have easily been in Candyland's car and nobody would have known since NASCAR took Kenseth's car because he won the race.

Regardless, it still doesn't let Gibbs off the hook. He's responsible for the engine whether he builds it in-house or buys it from a supplier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know rules is rules and all but I have to ask; What's the NASCAR spec on driver's weight?

Do Joey and Tony have to fit through the same template at inspection?

Way too severe of a fine in my eyes unless they can cite a logical reason how this infraction gave Kenseth an unfair advantage.

Until then, B as in B; S as in S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a minimum car weight (3300lbs) and that includes a baseline weight of 180lbs for the driver. If a driver weighs less than 180lbs the team has to add 10lbs of weight for every 10lbs the driver is under that 180 mark up to a maximum of 40lbs. So, if you have a driver under 149 pounds the car would have to weigh a minimum of 3340lbs to pass inspection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know rules is rules and all but I have to ask; What's the NASCAR spec on driver's weight?

Do Joey and Tony have to fit through the same template at inspection?

Way too severe of a fine in my eyes unless they can cite a logical reason how this infraction gave Kenseth an unfair advantage.

Until then, B as in B; S as in S.

NASCAR does not have to. If they don't like it, too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And those that break the rules, get thier gold taken away. More than likely almost all teams have been caught pushing the rules or a part was bad or not approved. Not a first here with Kenseth or the team.

Will see what NASCAR says this Wed about thier appeal. My guess, maybe owner points given back and thats it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • By The way that didn't work either!! Screw it I'll just use the cellular. 
    • It’s done automatically.  You might need an actual person to clear that log in stuff up.   Trash your laptop history if you haven’t tried that already.
    • 😂 yea pretty amazing how b o o b i e s gets flagged, but they can't respond or tell me why I  can't get logged in here on my laptop but I can on my cellular  😪
    • I grilled some brats yesterday, maybe next weekend will the next round...  
    • You got word censored cuz you said        B o o b ies….. haha.   Yeah, no… grilling is on hiatus for a bit.
    • Chicken mine,  melded in Mccormick poultry seasoning for 24 hours.  Grill will get a break till the frigid temps go away!
    • we had some nice weather yesterday and this conundrum was driving me crazy  so I drove up to the house to take another look. I got a bunch of goodies via ups yesterday (cables,  winch ratchet parts, handles, leaf springs etc).   I wanted to make sure the new leaf springs I got fit. I got everything laid out and ready to go. Will be busy this weekend with kids stuff and too cold to fish anyway, but I will try to get back up there again next weekend and get it done. I don't think it will be bad once I get it lifted up.    For anyone in the google verse, the leaf springs are 4 leafs and measure 25 1/4" eye  to eye per Yetti. I didnt want to pay their markup so just got something else comparable rated for the same weight.   I am a first time wheel house owner, this is all new to me. My house didn't come with any handles for the rear cables? I was told this week by someone in the industry that cordless drills do not have enough brake to lower it slow enough and it can damage the cables and the ratchets in the winches.  I put on a handle last night and it is 100% better than using a drill, unfortatenly I found out the hard way lol and will only use the ICNutz to raise the house now.
    • I haven’t done any leaf springs for a long time and I can’t completely see the connections in your pics BUT I I’d be rounding up: PB Blaster, torch, 3 lb hammer, chisel, cut off tool, breaker bar, Jack stands or blocks.   This kind of stuff usually isn’t the easiest.   I would think you would be able to get at what you need by keeping the house up with Jack stands and getting the pressure off that suspension, then attack the hardware.  But again, I don’t feel like I can see everything going on there.
    • reviving an old thread due to running into the same issue with the same year of house. not expecting anything from yetti and I already have replacement parts ordered and on the way.   I am looking for some input or feedback on how to replace the leaf springs themselves.    If I jack the house up and remove the tire, is it possible to pivot the axel assembly low enough to get to the other end of the leaf spring and remove that one bolt?   Or do I have to remove the entire pivot arm to get to it? Then I also have to factor in brake wire as well then. What a mess   My house is currently an hour away from my home at a relatives, going to go back up and look it over again and try to figure out a game plan.           Above pic is with house lowered on ice, the other end of that leaf is what I need to get to.   above pic is side that middle bolt broke and bottom 2 leafs fell out here is other side that didnt break but you can see bottom half of leaf already did but atleast bolt is still in there here is hub assembly in my garage with house lowered and tires off when I put new tires on it a couple months ago. hopefully I can raise house high enough that it can drop down far enough and not snap brake cable there so I can get to that other end of the leaf spring.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.