grizrunner Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 I'm looking to buy a 3 wheeler for light weight alternative(addition)to my 4x4. I've got my eye on an '84 200 elec/reverse/shaft dr., and also an '85 250 w/ same features. The 200 is near mint, and the 250 is decent. Neither need any work and both are complete. Tires on each are like new. Both are same price. $1100. I know the owner of the 200, don't on the 250. The machine would primarily be used or early/late ice fishing. No towing perms, just sleds/portables. Are there any differences other than a little weight and displacement? Advice on pros/cons/which to buy is much appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macgyver55 Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 They are virtually the same machine aside from displacement. If it were me, I'd probably go with the 200 since you know the owner and its the cleaner of the 2. The difference in power wont be an issue based on what your intended use is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizrunner Posted December 31, 2011 Author Share Posted December 31, 2011 Thanks Mac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonicrunch Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 It's been along time, but as far as the Big Red's go, I am 99 percent certain the 200's were chain drive and had no rear suspension.Are both these machines BigRed's?http://www.3wheelerworld.com/oldsite/1984HondaSpecpage.shtmlhttp://www.3wheelerworld.com/oldsite/1985HondaSpecpage.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macgyver55 Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 It believe in 1984 it depends if it is a 200M or a 200ES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 I had a Honda 200 that was chain drive and no rear suspension and bought a Big Red when it 1st came with shaft drive and rear suspension. If I recall the Big Red was an '85. So, I tend to agree, the 200's were chain drive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macgyver55 Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 Dave, do your homework!The 1984 200M is chain drive, the 200ES is shaft drive. There was also the 200S model that was chain drive with smaller tires (22") and no reverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizrunner Posted December 31, 2011 Author Share Posted December 31, 2011 Mac is right 200 ES is shaft, M's were chain. I'm guessing E(electric start)and S(shaft). The M may have indicated Manual start(recoil). Sonic you missed the specs for the ES just scroll up on that spec page you linked. That's ok though...only missed by 1% I'm no expert here, just did a little research. I found '84 the first year of the Big Reds. The ES model introduced shaft drive w/reverse, suspension, and solid state CD ignition and electric start. Prior to that there was the 200 ATC, and no 250cc offered. I had an '83 ATC 200(no ES or M designation), but that was a different animal. No suspension, different ignition system, chain drive, and 75# lighter(@300#) than the 84 200 ES(375), and 35# lighter than the M(325). I also found the 250 ES weighs in at 425. I was just wondering if there was any drawbacks or little "quirks" between the 200 and 250, like possible maintenence issues. Thanks again guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 Dave, do your homework! Why....I just ask you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordie Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 I have a 83 ATC Big Red 200es at least that is the sticker package it came with. It is chain drive and no reverse I belive they went to shaft and reverse in 84 well late 83 anyways.I would go with the 200 as mentioned in the earlier post. I also belive that the 200 was a better /durable engine but thats me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonicrunch Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Well look at that. Hmm. You learn a little everyday.Yep, 84 big red was shaft drive and reverse. Cool. I don't think I ever saw one. Around my home town there were many '83s, and I had an '85.I loved my 85. It was indestructible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Outdoors Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Dave, do your homework! The 1984 200M is chain drive, the 200ES is shaft drive. There was also the 200S model that was chain drive with smaller tires (22") and no reverse. Yeah, the Honda 200S was a 185S on steroids. Had one and loved it. Also owned a Honda 90 and Yamaha 125 two stroke three wheelers. I miss them and their manuverability in tight places, but the 4x4's are really more comfortable . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizrunner Posted January 7, 2012 Author Share Posted January 7, 2012 Ended up passing on both. Wife talked me out of it afraid for the safety of the kids(to heck with me though...I've got some good lifeinsurance!).Talked to my insurance agent and he couldn't cover me, and no one will.Picking up a smaller/lighter 4x4 tomorrow. Kids will grow into it eventually. Until then it's my no/low snow ice rig.Thanks for all your input anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGurk Posted January 7, 2012 Share Posted January 7, 2012 I think for the price they were asking you are better off getting a smaller 4 wheeler like you stated. If you were talking 500-700 that might be diffferent. Nostalgia costs a lot these days! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizrunner Posted January 9, 2012 Author Share Posted January 9, 2012 I ended up with a stock '02 Honda Foreman ES. Next to mint. No previous mods. Never had a plow or winch. Never had a ball in the hitch. New aluminum wheels. 1000mi. $2600. It'll make a great 2nd 4x4 for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordie Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Sounds like a great machine hope you enjoy and get lots of great use out of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.