Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rmh2o

Digital cameras

19 posts in this topic

I would like to get a digital camera and would like some advice.I would like to spend under $100 if possible but would spend more if it was worth it.I searched the web already and only found 10 million makes and models, now I am confused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not going to like the cameras that cost under $100, you can get a decent one for $175 to $200. Look around and do some research and spend the most you possibly can, there are some very neat cameras out there.
I have a Cannon that cost me a little over $300 and I am very happy with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree it is hard to find something good for less than $100. However, my daughter gave her 5 year old (that loves to take pictures) a $40.00 dollar one. This is much cheaper to let him take all the pictures he wants and not pay for the film and processing. He actually gets some pretty good pictures.

I have a HP 315 which I really like. It takes great pictures and the software that comes with it is very easy to use. You need to decide what you want to use it for and remember you also have to have a photo printer in order to print your own pictures.

Good luck!

------------------
Phyl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can buy a decent camera from around $ 100 to $ 180. I use mine for work and I paid $ 125, it's a Fuji 2300. Few important things:
1 Needs to be at least 2 Megapixels.
2 Has to have LCD display on back.
3 Removable memory card (that's where it stores pictures, the more MB the better).
4 Zoom
5 USB connector for computer (don't buy it if it has serial connector).

Brands are more or less important, try to stay with a known one.
Start this way, then in future you can always get your money back when you sell it and buy a fancier one when you'll be more expert and want more features.

[This message has been edited by Valv (edited 11-20-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one thing about zoom, you want a higher optical zoom than digital, if zoom is important to you. digital just makes the pixles larger within your pic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a sony handycam. Can download fishin videos right onto the computer. Make movies and then go back and snap pics out of the movies or woth the camera. Has memory stick tech. also. Even night vision. Just learning and it's a blast!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about a digital camcorder but didn’t know if I could clip still shots? If that is the case that I can clip stills then a few extra $$$$$ would be worth it. I think you get a better zoom also? The digital cameras I’ve used it seems like you have to be so darn close. frown.gif The digital camcorders have really dropped in price smile.gif and what I’ve read they have added new features?
My .02 worth?
“FISH” grin.gif
Any thoughts on which is the best digital camcorder that they have used? confused.gif

------------------
http://www.icesaws.com/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does a person have to have a digital camera to put pictures on the web or is it just more convienient and better quality.I have a scanner but I am not sure how or if it is possible to scan pics and post them.
thanks for the replies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup-perz!! Get the best one you can afford.
Digi-cam pros -
Editing the images, storing the images, e-mailing and pasting the images, instantly reviewing the images.
Cons -
If it's traditional quality prints you're after - it's tough, and you have to shop around for good output services.
I take mine fishing, but I keep it in a ziploc, and shoot through the bag.

------------------
<)/////><{
RobertC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am primarily looking for a camera that i can post pictures on the web with if I want to sell something because the first question asked is do you have a picture.I would also like to use it for general use like in the boat and outdoors so i am not sure an expensive one would be a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RobertC if you dont mind me asking what kind of camera do you have and how do you like it or would you recomend somthing else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rmh2o,
You sure can, just scan and save as a jpeg or gif(the most common formats for email and web) gif generally takes less megs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year, day after Thanksgiving, Sears had a clearance HP model for 99.00. It works really well and takes very good pictures.
I would recommend getting at least a 64 MB card in it.
The only draw back to a cheaper camera is that the batteries in them do not last near as long, unless its just me.
The more you run the display on the back the faster the batteries will drain.
I have mine set to show the picture I just took on the display for 10 seconds, then store it to the memory card. Saves keeping pictures that suck and keeps the battery from draining.
I think for what you wanted to use it for, a cheaper camera would be fine. Stick with a top brand- HP, Kodak, and some of the others mentioned here.
All the ones you buy today come with USB cables, as far as I know.


This is one of the hardest computer related pieces there are to buy.
Good luck.

[This message has been edited by D-man (edited 11-20-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rmh2o,
Well, I neglected mentioning the make and model, 'cause it's a really pricey rig that we got for Christmas a couple of years ago. I use it more than my wife, who's pretty much blown it off 'cause it doesn't produce great print quality. It's a Toshiba PDR-M4. The software that comes with it, though, is called ImageExpert, and it's GREAT!!! I'm sure that software comes with the cheaper Toshibas, too.

------------------
<)/////><{
RobertC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Checkout http://www.epinions.com for reviews of digital cameras. I believe the web site also you to run a query based on price.

I am thinking of purchasing a Canon A40 in the near future. The A40 costs about 250 bones (so it is a little higher than your price range of 100 bones). Every report I have read about this camera says it has the features of the big boys.

Shop around; often times sellers will include various extras such as an upgraded memory card, cables, protective case...

Marmot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive checked there a couple of times but some of the newer models have not been reviewed yet I will have to take a look at the a40

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone take their cards into WalMart or any photo place and have the pictures developed there? What's the quality like? How much do they charge? Trying to avoid the whole printer thing....or is that the way to go?

------------------
Hemlock
"Throw'm back"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most printers don't do very well, if you're looking for analog-quality prints. My wife used an outfit called shutterfly.com to e-mail jpgs to, and they mailed back fairly nice prints.

But remember - DIGITAL IS NOT ANALOG!!!! smile.gif
Just like the truest sound recordings are vinyl masters, the best best quality photos are still taken the old-fashioned way. Just like CD's and MP3s VS. Vinyl, the digital advantage is in edit, handling and output convenience.

------------------
<)/////><{
RobertC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors