Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
bmc2b

Red

15 posts in this topic

What's up with fish and red? Cajun line is red because fish can't see it, and many hooks are red to simulate bleeding bait. Can they see it or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red is the first color to disappear in water due to it not absorbing all colors equally (or why water looks blue...)

"This absorption spectrum of water (red light absorbs 100 times more than blue light), together with the five-times greater scattering of blue light over red light, contributes to the blue color of lake, river and ocean waters."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK then. Why do fish bite on red lures and plain red hooks better than others at times???????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red is red, blood is blood...regardless of where it is? Water or land? Good question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, and here I thought the water looked typicaly blue because of the reflection from the sky???

Something to Ponder???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe the red hooks "disappear" under water, I always thought blood looked more black under water.....

This has been an argument in fishing circles for quite some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red is Red is Red. Weather or not it "disappears" faster or it looks like blood. I have heard two theories, both make sense to me. One is that red line "disappears" because it is translucent and that red hooks may look differnt underwater, but being as they appear the same as blood does out of water then they appear the same underwater too. The other is that when red is filtered out and because almost invisible, it makes your bait apear like it has no hook in it at all and that may provide a much more natural presentation than even a bare hook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think red stuff really makes as big of a difference as some people make it sound. One good fisherman that I know told me this, and I read it in a magazine article also: Yes, maybe red is the first color to dissapear underwater. But, even if the red color goes away, that dosen't mean that it will be clear. Baisically, as the line goes deeper into the water, it will go from red to a grayish/black color, and still visible to the fish. If you really don't want the fish to see your line, clear mono or fluoro would probably be a better choice.

As for the red hooks, the same thing probably happens as with the line. I guess they might look like blood to the fish, especially in shallow clear water. Even if it doesn't actually look red to the fish, it's still about the same shade as blood.

If you use red gear and have good luck with it, and I know some people do, you might as well use it. But I've tried red line/hooks and don't see a difference. Whatever you've got the most confidence in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, and here I thought the water looked typicaly blue because of the reflection from the sky???

Something to Ponder???

The reflection on the surface and the color of water are two different things. Most lakes around here are either dark brown or green due to other things in the water. If you go to the ocean however and catch anything that is white (like a kingfish), it will look blue coming up to the surface (assuming you're fishing in fairly deep water).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason red hook simulates blood. New one to me. Sounds feasable.

Another reason red is used for hooks and on bellies of rapalla's

When fish go into spawning red become prevalant on there bodies. Predator fish keey off the color red as they associate the color red to easy pickens to fish roe and vulnerable fish that are spent energy wise from the spawn.

Just another tidbit floating out there.

As for the line being red maybe its best used in stained water as it may blend in with the color of the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important thing to pay attention to with line is the index of refraction. Matching the index of refraction would render the line as close to invisible as possible. Flourocarbon is closest to water's refraction. Red will appear in a greyscale beyond 15 meters depth in pure water. Lakes will all vary in maximum depth penetration. Why red hooks work better then? Not really sure. Let me know when you figure it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think red stuff really makes as big of a difference as some people make it sound. One good fisherman that I know told me this, and I read it in a magazine article also: Yes, maybe red is the first color to dissapear underwater. But, even if the red color goes away, that dosen't mean that it will be clear. Baisically, as the line goes deeper into the water, it will go from red to a grayish/black color, and still visible to the fish. If you really don't want the fish to see your line, clear mono or fluoro would probably be a better choice.

I don't think red line is all it's cracked up to be either. Last winter we were out trolling walleyes on Banks Lake (in WA), 4 rods in the water, all rigged the same except one of them had Cajun Red on it. That rod hooked less fish than any of the other three. Sadly that was also my rod. After that trip I pulled off the red and went back to clear mono.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bright green line is popular with salt water fishing, I always found that interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Infisherman there was an article that said fish dont have the computing power to associate red with food. It goes like red=red, and they dont think about it, food=food, lure looks like food so lure=food. I think its a gimmick so instead of having 1/0-5/0 you have all those in red, brass, blue, green and what ever they come out with next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • You would get what you deserve if he does do what he says he's going to do. You would get to pay for a wall, probably watch your children or grandchildren go to war, pay for his infrastructure spending, you'll still get some kind of government sponsored healthcare, more gun control and I can only imagine what else.
    • You don't seem to get it at all. It's all about what these candidates stand for. If trump would completely change his stances (again) to be closer to what the Libertarians stand for then yes you may have a point. With his current views I would not be a Trump supporter and would hope he would have no way of gaining the Libertarian party nomination. 
    • But yet you can't answer PF's question. If you can't think of any you admire, why should he be able to? That question is like the infamous, "If you could be a tree, what kind of tree would you be?" Stupid questions don't deserve an answer. At least he didn't say Putin.  
    • OK, here is your big chance to get some land away from the evil state government and back into private hands.    And help out the schools and fight cronyism at the same time.    (the requirement you need to be there to bid is clearly a crony deal in my opinion) The Department of Natural Resources will sell 40 northern Minnesota parcels in three public oral bid auctions in October and November. Tuesday, Oct. 25 – Nine northwestern Minnesota parcels will be auctioned at the County Administration Building in Bemidji. Thursday, Oct. 27 – 27 northeastern Minnesota parcels will be auctioned at the Lake County Courthouse in Two Harbors. Thursday, Nov. 3 – Four parcels in north-central Minnesota will be auctioned at DNR Brainerd area office. The properties include unimproved recreational land and residential lakeshore parcels in Aitkin, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Hubbard, Itasca, Lake, and St. Louis counties. There is a wide range of sizes and land uses in this selection of sales, from a small 0.80 acre former water access site on Pine Lake in Clearwater County to a 200-acre recreational parcel in Breitung Township in northeastern St. Louis County. The DNR regularly sells land which is no longer needed for its original conservation purpose, after a thorough internal review, and after giving state agencies and local governments opportunities to purchase the land. Proceeds from sales of lands the DNR had once acquired go to the DNR division that had managed the land and are used to purchase and develop lands better suited to that division’s conservation goals. Many of the parcels to be sold are School Trust lands. Proceeds from these auction sales are deposited to a fund that benefits the state’s public school system. School Trust land by law can only be sold at public auction.
      Bidders are advised to obtain and view the property data sheet, be familiar with the property, minimum bid price, and terms and conditions of sale prior to attending the auction. To obtain a property data sheet or terms and conditions of sale call 651-259-5432, or 888-646-6367 or email landsale@dnr.state.mn.us. The property data sheets are also available online at www.dnr.state.mn.us/lands_minerals/landsale/.
    • Watch the video.  He didn't say "I don't find much to admire...."   He said "uh... I'm having an Aleppo moment... maybe the guy that used to be president of mexico.... then weld said "Fox" and he said "yeah, Fox"   You had to see it to believe it.    
    • Who are the world leaders you admire the most? Feel free to name them . Personally I can't think of any I have admiration for
  • Our Sponsors