Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
bmc2b

Red

15 posts in this topic

What's up with fish and red? Cajun line is red because fish can't see it, and many hooks are red to simulate bleeding bait. Can they see it or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red is the first color to disappear in water due to it not absorbing all colors equally (or why water looks blue...)

"This absorption spectrum of water (red light absorbs 100 times more than blue light), together with the five-times greater scattering of blue light over red light, contributes to the blue color of lake, river and ocean waters."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK then. Why do fish bite on red lures and plain red hooks better than others at times???????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red is red, blood is blood...regardless of where it is? Water or land? Good question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, and here I thought the water looked typicaly blue because of the reflection from the sky???

Something to Ponder???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe the red hooks "disappear" under water, I always thought blood looked more black under water.....

This has been an argument in fishing circles for quite some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red is Red is Red. Weather or not it "disappears" faster or it looks like blood. I have heard two theories, both make sense to me. One is that red line "disappears" because it is translucent and that red hooks may look differnt underwater, but being as they appear the same as blood does out of water then they appear the same underwater too. The other is that when red is filtered out and because almost invisible, it makes your bait apear like it has no hook in it at all and that may provide a much more natural presentation than even a bare hook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think red stuff really makes as big of a difference as some people make it sound. One good fisherman that I know told me this, and I read it in a magazine article also: Yes, maybe red is the first color to dissapear underwater. But, even if the red color goes away, that dosen't mean that it will be clear. Baisically, as the line goes deeper into the water, it will go from red to a grayish/black color, and still visible to the fish. If you really don't want the fish to see your line, clear mono or fluoro would probably be a better choice.

As for the red hooks, the same thing probably happens as with the line. I guess they might look like blood to the fish, especially in shallow clear water. Even if it doesn't actually look red to the fish, it's still about the same shade as blood.

If you use red gear and have good luck with it, and I know some people do, you might as well use it. But I've tried red line/hooks and don't see a difference. Whatever you've got the most confidence in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, and here I thought the water looked typicaly blue because of the reflection from the sky???

Something to Ponder???

The reflection on the surface and the color of water are two different things. Most lakes around here are either dark brown or green due to other things in the water. If you go to the ocean however and catch anything that is white (like a kingfish), it will look blue coming up to the surface (assuming you're fishing in fairly deep water).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason red hook simulates blood. New one to me. Sounds feasable.

Another reason red is used for hooks and on bellies of rapalla's

When fish go into spawning red become prevalant on there bodies. Predator fish keey off the color red as they associate the color red to easy pickens to fish roe and vulnerable fish that are spent energy wise from the spawn.

Just another tidbit floating out there.

As for the line being red maybe its best used in stained water as it may blend in with the color of the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important thing to pay attention to with line is the index of refraction. Matching the index of refraction would render the line as close to invisible as possible. Flourocarbon is closest to water's refraction. Red will appear in a greyscale beyond 15 meters depth in pure water. Lakes will all vary in maximum depth penetration. Why red hooks work better then? Not really sure. Let me know when you figure it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think red stuff really makes as big of a difference as some people make it sound. One good fisherman that I know told me this, and I read it in a magazine article also: Yes, maybe red is the first color to dissapear underwater. But, even if the red color goes away, that dosen't mean that it will be clear. Baisically, as the line goes deeper into the water, it will go from red to a grayish/black color, and still visible to the fish. If you really don't want the fish to see your line, clear mono or fluoro would probably be a better choice.

I don't think red line is all it's cracked up to be either. Last winter we were out trolling walleyes on Banks Lake (in WA), 4 rods in the water, all rigged the same except one of them had Cajun Red on it. That rod hooked less fish than any of the other three. Sadly that was also my rod. After that trip I pulled off the red and went back to clear mono.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bright green line is popular with salt water fishing, I always found that interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Infisherman there was an article that said fish dont have the computing power to associate red with food. It goes like red=red, and they dont think about it, food=food, lure looks like food so lure=food. I think its a gimmick so instead of having 1/0-5/0 you have all those in red, brass, blue, green and what ever they come out with next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • What exactly will you be using it for? Driving around the country with the top down, hunting the back woods, fording small creeks?   Do you have a particular budget to stick to?
    • at times the prop will stop on mine, usually when I move it to turn, need to tear into it sometime, I have use fishelectronics for misc. parts
    • I might have to get out and test drive a few and figure out what I like and don't like. Definitly not buying new so Ill narrow it down a bit and then wait for that cherry to show up.
    • Good job on getting it done with a limited amount of time left to hunt.
    • Love the curvature of the antlers.   Beautiful mount!
    • Not a monster for sure but he makes the season a success. I wasnt going to be able to hunt tomorrow because of a first communion, not afternoon today because of my dads birthday, and only evenings Monday&Tuesday.  So time was limited and i am more than happy to eat jake. Here he is.
    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
  • Our Sponsors