Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Royce Aardahl

Planets and Moon

23 posts in this topic

Nice, dude! Really crisp. Do you mind if I post mine in this thread and others who have them do the same? It's cool either way with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was absolutely a gorgeous sight! I got done with a hockey T&I shoot just about seven and got to see it, but was already frozen enough to stand outside for another half an hour taking shots. I'll regret it tomorrow, but is sure feels good to be warm now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ken, as soon as I was done shooting the great gray owl after sunset, I set up the new tripod (thanks for the birthday gift, buddy!) and waited half an hour in the comfort of my warm vehicle for both planets to emerge, and then spent 10 minutes capturing them before hopping back in the 4Runner for the ride home.

That tripod/head is a winner! A monster for sure, but a winner too. gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
I set up the new tripod

Well, I guess we'll see if it really is tough enough to hold up a car! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post away everybody! I was using my powershot, handheld, ISO 800, shutter speed 1/100, and TV setting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It cleared this afternoon, but I had to work until 5:30. By the time I got home and grrabbed my camera, it was dark. I tried anyay.

2008_12010003.jpg

Half hour earlier would have been awesome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok this is my first post of a photo, hopefully the photo will show smile I used a Canon XTi with 100-400 with a 1.4 tel, I wish that it didn't have the tel on, but I forgot the lens caps for it so I didn't want to take it off. 13 sec, f/6.3, 800 ISO, 140mm, with tripod. Suggestions and comments welcome, also can someone tell me why the photo got a second moon?

thanks, John

moon.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually John did you have a lens hood on? That might have caused that moon.

With the long exposure time you exposed the surface of the moon and got a fair amount of movement blur from the moon and planets moving. It takes a fairly fast shutter speed to stop the blur of the planets caused by the earth's rotation.

I used a 1 second exposure and even that showed just a bit of motion blur. I used settings of ISO 200, 1 second and f8 just to give you an idea. Hope that helps a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan, I didn't use a lens hood, but the lens did have a UV Haze filter. Does the photo look dark? I did some adjustments on my laptop before uploading the photo, but now looking at it on my pc it looks very dark.

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John, unless you shot at twilight it is certainly going to be a dark photo. I do think the moons and planets were exposed for a little to long of a time period. You had an ISO of 800 and 13 second exposure. I used ISO 200 and 1 second exposure with OK results.

I am almost positive the combination of no lens hood and the filter on the front caused the second moon. Filters can actually cause more flare especially with night shots like this. If it is an in-expensive brand filter they are a bit more prone to flare as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what I got shortly after sunset.

Canon 30D, Canon 70-200 f2.8L at 200mm, iso100, 1/30 at f2.8, Manfrotto 475B tripod/3039 head

3075848193_88c18db9fe_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang, I really like the colors you have Steve. I forgot all about this until a friend called and it was way past twilight. I wanted some blue still left in the sky but.... I did go out again around 7pm because I saw some wispy clouds come by and put some color in the moon but I was too slow to catch it.

Here is mine; 50D, 70-200/2.8 at 190mm. ISO 200, f8, 1 second.

428720339_4C9UY-L.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan the flare off of the lower planet is cool. I don't know if that is what the camera captured or if you added it, but if you could write a plug in for that you might make some cash. Nice job everyone. I got out too early, forgot my remote and had my old cheap tripod. I haven't downloaded any images yet, but I think I botched it up pretty good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine was with my Powershot, handheld,TV,1/60, ISO 400 20 power zoom. Fun stuff, nice pics all. Nice color steve. Under exposed or how did you get the tint?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eyeguy, the sunset where I was cast a lot of red into the western sky.

The image was slightly overexposed, but not by much, and since I shot RAW I was able to recover the highlights when opening the image. It helped a lot that the sky was still fairly blue and bright upon capture. Later, the contrast between sky and moon/planets was much more pronounced, and that limits both the capture and what can be done in post-processing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan the flare off of the lower planet is cool. I don't know if that is what the camera captured or if you added it, but if you could write a plug in for that you might make some cash. Nice job everyone. I got out too early, forgot my remote and had my old cheap tripod. I haven't downloaded any images yet, but I think I botched it up pretty good.

Actually I didn't add that you can thank the lens for that look but it is easy enough to do in photo shop. It is on the smaller of the two as well just doesn't show up at the smaller size posted here. My understanding is it will show up at smaller f-stops and it is created by the openings in the aperture of the lens. The number of star patterns = number of blades in the lens.

I wanted a longer exposure to get some detail in the moon and make the planets a bit larger and a bit of flare off the moon crescent. I've got a few that aren't blown but they look like dots in a dark closet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it, thanks. I was thinkin I shoulda been shooting sooner before it got all black up there. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally got to process my images, and this is the only one that I liked. I took my photos just after the sun slipped below the horizon, so I could only see one planet with my eye and so I framed the other one out of the shot. These events are always fun. We get to see a whole bunch of different shots of the same subject from folks all around the area. Thanks for sharing everyone. Enjoy.

SundownMoonandPlanet.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one! Excellent detail in the moon. Sure makes a difference doing it shortly after sunset vs in the full dark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All cool pic's everyone! I haven't had much in the way of any decent photo opps on the subject as it's been cloudy for what seems like weeks now!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I hunt zone 1.  Very interesting to see those numbers.  From what I have seen the herd is showing signs of rebound in our neighborhood.  We're a ways off from being able to tolerate hunters choice, but we're seeing deer again finally.  I agree the herd is in better shape than 2-3 years ago when many people saw no deer and no signs of deer.     So what does it all mean?  I suspect the widespread pain of the glut in major swaths of zone 1 for the dark years has woke some up to the idea of passing does.  There was certainly more opportunity with fewer bucks-only zones and larger doe tag numbers in certain DPAs.    What will be interesting is how the DNR responds to more deer on the landscape up here but fewer does being shot.  We had two doe tags in our group this year and we proudly tossed them in the fire, unfilled, at the end of season.  
    • Inaugural concert attendance (estimated):   Obama 2009: 400,000 Trump 2017: 10,000   Also Trump nodded off because it was so great.
    • I have this problem from time to time but not often.  Sometimes there are little bubbles on the bottom of the transducer and sometimes the ducer isn't below the ice, sometimes it just takes 5 or 10 minutes of sitting in the hole before it starts to pick up the jig.  Other times it works flawlessly.
    • Bingo.  Everything is going good so far.   Not that I would need to answer someone who wasted their vote but being tomorrow will be a great day I thought I'd drop you a line.     The so called Libertarians in silly town.
    • I hate to break your bubble, but your vote and other Trump voters in Minnesota were wasted votes the same as you say those who voted 3rd party were wasted.
    • That a shot at me being former military?
    • All of you who wasted your votes can thank us later.  In four years you'll have another chance to earn your right to be critical of the POTUS.
  • Our Sponsors