Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
fishinchicks

Donkey Races

13 posts in this topic

Our local FFA Chapter held a fundraiser on Friday night. They hosted Donkey Races, with each animal in each heat sponsored by a local business. My daughter was one of the riders, representing the cross country team.

Before:

2844323072_03343d7fe0_o.jpg

Practicing her hurdlers stretch. Wait...cross country runners don't need to do that stretch!

2844318964_74cab64f89_o.jpg

No animals were harmed during the races, but many people hurt their pride! gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah! Those are neat, fishinchicks. The action shot is very nice, but I love your daughter's expression in the first one. That's one for the wall, or maybe both in a single mat and frame. She's got that worried look in image 1 and then you see the reason for the worry in image 2. Did you get her picking herself back up after being tossed? I love how the donkey's ears are laid back in image 1. Like he's planning the very move he'll use in image 2. Those donkeys can't be trusted! gringrin

On a technical note, I see you shot the action shot in low light at 1/100 sec shutter speed, with the lens aperture wide open and the iso at 400. You did very well to get that image as sharp as you did at that shutter speed. The arm blurring is the only unsharp part of the image, and that type of blur sometimes can actually add to the dynamic look of an action or sports image, since it conveys motion. That's a judgment call, of course. Some photographers really like that motion in limbs as long as the face/body are sharp, and some like to freeze everything.

If in the worried portrait it's a full-frame image, you might also try cropping into a vertical with only your daughter and the donkey in the image. That'll eliminate the distractions caused by the other people, riveting attention completely on your daughter's expression and the donkey's evil intent.

Again, nice work in poor lighting!

I took the liberty of making the crop for you and posting it below. I see that you were at 250mm for that shot, which likely means you were using your 50-250mm IS lens and so there was no way to compose it tightly and vertical at capture, so the only way to accomplish this comp is a crop after the fact. But if what you posted was full frame, you should still be able to get at least a nice 5x7 print (or bigger) out of this crop.

Sorry I took these liberties, ma'am. I rarely critique unless someone specifically asks for it, and I also generally ask permission to do this kind of thing because I don't want to offend anyone. I hope that's OK. smilesmile

2844378568_323071a490_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Fishinchicks, those are really great! Although, that donkey looks like a real jackass! laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oof, Mike, I didn't have the guts to say that! But a guy who'll put a Minnesota Viking in his avatar will do pretty much anything. gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I was able to use that joke twice this week! I know you're jealous about the avatar Steve.

I do like the cropped version better but the falling shot is priceless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go Pack!

Sorry, fishinchicks. Shouldn't turn this into a Vikes/Pack debate, but those darn Vikes fans (no Super Bowl rings, no chance for one this year) have no shame! Oh, uh, you wouldn't happen to be a Vikings fan, would you fishinchicks? Sorry again! blushblushblush

Mike, I agree that falling shot is great. Come to think of it, it could be cropped vertically too as an experiment to see which looks best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stcatfish - I need all the help I can get when it comes to understanding all the settings. smile I used the sports setting as a crutch. Would it have been better to turn the IS off in that situation, or try out either AV or TV? An external flash would have helped, but I will have to wait for my birthday for that. laugh

I didn't take a lot of time in post processing, but will play around with the cropping to get the improved comp.

Probably the hardest thing about taking pictures that night was trying to hold steady while laughing really hard!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I almost forgot...

I gave up on the Vikings a long time ago. I am no longer allowed to watch football with my hubby after the remote throwing incident. The bruise went away after a week or so. whistlegrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

chicks, modesty forbids me from asking all the questions poised at the tip of my tongue about who threw the remote and who got bruised. gringrin

I think for what you were doing, the sports automated setting was fine. On the XT, it automatically opens aperture to the max and sets the fastest possible shutter speed at the selected iso.

You could have bumped up to iso800 for the action shot, which would have bumped up your shutter speed and possibly frozen more of the waving arm, but it still would not have been completely frozen, and I think you did quite well with the light you had. You could have accomplished the same thing in Av mode by spinning the top dial to open your aperture to the max, but you have to use what's comfortable to use, and the poor light was the real limiting factor here.

Using a supplementary flash would have helped a bit. If you pick up either the 420/430EX or 550/580EX, you can select high speed synchronization on the flash, which will allow the flash to synch with the camera even at fast shutter speeds, and that will help saturate the scene with better light.

I hear you on the laughing part. Shooting weddings and action portraits, I often have to discipline myself to keep my laughter on the inside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shots, Chicks. You did extremely well, considering the circumstances. I have to agree about the look on your daughter's face - priceless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are fun looking shots, the falling shot is great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

chicks, modesty forbids me from asking all the questions poised at the tip of my tongue about who threw the remote and who got bruised. gringrin

Let's just say that I have a good throwing arm, and the Vikes messed up on a totally obvious play. The cheerleaders could have read the defense better. grinlaughgrin Sometimes my German/Dutch temper can't be tempered!

I will be asking for a flash with a tilt option. My father in law had a camera with a bulb flash that gave the people in the front row a sunburn. Hubby is afraid of big flashes pointed right at him. hehe

Thanks for all the comments everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors