Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Doop

How much is too much?

10 posts in this topic

I know it obviously depends on your income...but how much is too much for you guys to pay for a Canadian fishing trip?

I mean...my wife and I make decent money...it would take me a couple years to pay for some of the rates that lodges are asking now days. More power to them...because some people are willing to pay whatever to fish where ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's already too much for me. Gas is killing me. I've been fishing within 30 minutes of the Metro and mostly hit the Croix. Would love to go to Canada but I have more things that need to be done with the kind of money it costs to head up there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I don't worry about it anymore and just pay, you can't put a price on things you love to do. So IMO you can't put a price on fishing or hunting lol. But whom am I to talk, im single and young so I can get away with alot of stuff that if I was married and had a family and mortgage I couldn't get away with otherwise. Plus if you have someone to go fishing with to split the gas costs it isnt all that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much is too much... walleye, nice northerns and maybe smallies. I would say $500 if you bring some buddies, otherwise I would plan a trip closr to home. I just went on a salmon trip on lake Michigan for $350 and had a blast. That included a guide and a place to stay. I didn't pay for any gas though, which was really nice, but another $100 would have more that covered that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I leave for canada on the 18th, this will be my 4th year and it has not cost us more then 1,000.00 ea. for a 7 day trip thats pulling boats food and drink. I would say 1500.00 would make me think twice maybe 3 times. I don't know anywhere else you can go and boat 100 eyes a day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have some friends that went way up into manitoba. nelson river, they tented on an island. no motels etc, gas food and drink, cost them $800.00. to each his own as far as idea of cost.if its worth it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its hard to put a price on your yearly trip. If you and your wife love it, DO IT!! Save and cut cost other places for the year and you will be fine. You only live once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you are considering a trip to northwest Ontario. I think a $1000 for a week is not unreasonable. That would include a cabin for 7 nights and fishing on a really good lake like Lake of the Woods, Rainy or many others. Another $500 to $700 for gas, bait and other incidentals should just about cover it. You are going to eat no matter where you are so, food doesn't add much to the cost. That comes to $1,700 for great week of fishing for two people. Not bad in my book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been going up north of Sioux Lookout every June since 2001. We spend four days of fishing, 8 guys. We drive up and bring our own boats and gear at 2 guys per boat. That's four trucks and four boats. I get paid biweekly and each payday I set aside $25 for the trip, which so far has been more than enough.

In 2001 the trip cost me roughly $425. Last year it cost me about $565. This year it cost me about $535. We shaved cost this year by putting three guys per boat so we eliminated one boat and one truck. The fuel savings offset the higher cost. We also shaved nearly $150 off of our grocery bill by changing our menu.

I figure it's been pretty reasonable for us so far.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it depends on how you look at it.

On one hand, someone like me spends a fair amount on rods, tackle, line, boat, gas, truck, new lures, magazines, and on and on and on.

$1000 for canada trip is alot of money.

Now, the other guy. One spinning rod and reel, a handful of jigs, a coupe of lures, some mediocre rain gear. 50 walleyes a day for 7 days. Maybe the only fishing you do all year.

$1000 seems pretty cheap.

Hard to say which way is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We can only hope to catch a bigger party crappie than him! 
    •   I never followed the Farve story, so don't know the details.  If I had to guess, it would be similar to Rush's.. Rush's story was more interesting to me because he is such a complete hypocrite on the issue.   Arizona hasn't legalized weed, but they are taking on the prescription drug problem, which is the root of the hard drug problem.  (You know, the part you and the feds refuse to acknowledge.)  I suggest you view the "RX to Addiction" video I posted earlier, and the link above to see what steps they are taking.    The feds actually act as an enabler for hard drug addiction.   If you have done your homework at all, you should know this.     Pointing out the double standard for enforcement of drug laws is part of the answer, which again, you refuse to acknowledge.          
    • How come you aren't talking about Bret Farve? Same as Rush, didn't go to jail either.   Are you aware of any cases of people going to jail for this behavior?   They don't seem to make the news.     AZ way behind, several states already have legalized recreational weed.   It is coming nation wide.     For me, the real question is what are sometimes called "hard drugs".   Heroin, Cocaine, Meth being the big three with a whole bunch of others like fetanyl etc.    Making them legal and sold otc like recreational marijuana seems to me like it would be a bad idea, although there are folks that seem to think otherwise.   And they are part of the "war on drugs"     So, I keep asking the folks here who are saying "end the war on drugs" what that means.     So far, not much for concrete answers.   Fingerpointing at affluent pill addicts that get treatment, or those that die, is not an answer.     

    • Of course they are Nick, that is what they do. The sad part is you only think one party is capable of this, your not nearly as dense as JV so you should be picking up on these things by now. Just because one party is less evil in your eyes doesn't mean you shouldn't see through their negative contributions to this country.

    • Hardly, I'm advocating we had the worst two choices in the history of America that I am aware of. Well done two party system, you make yourself less relevant by the day.

    • Ha ya I didn't realize he was that bad. I haven't heard anything relating to protecting players at the trade deadline CM so hopefully that is bunk. I suspect Chuck waits until the prices come down and picks up someone for cheap that will be just a filler, these guys are going for pretty high prices right now.

    • Isn't this up your ally Del? He probably has some success but it would depend on the "patient". Many people have probably healed themselves through the placebo of religious beliefs. If it works it works, who am I to argue if they are getting results but I will admit I doubt anything works across the board for everyone, we already proved that with modern medicine. 
    •       But Trump is going to make America Great Again, so he should be more open with his press briefings, even if it means some of the reporters aren't always friendly.      
  • Our Sponsors