Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott M

2008 NBA Draft Lottery

42 posts in this topic

Next Tuesday you can gloat or complain about the Timberwolves' results from the Draft Lottery. I hope they can get lucky and sneak into the 1 or 2. Sure would be nice to get some luck for a change.

However I'll temper my expectations and say the obvious: McHale IS still in charge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on!!! It's a Minnesota sports team, do you really think they are going to get a top pick? Even if they get it out of the lottery, which they won't, McHale will trade it to Boston for a bucket of Gatorade or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha! McHale would definately do something like that! But in all seriousness, it would be nice if the Wolves could score a top 3 pick. There are some solid players coming out that could make a very big impact next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will definately be interesting to see where we land. Also, do we have any added picks this year from past trades?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, do we have any added picks this year from past trades?

You're joking right? shocked I think McHale gave our picks away until 2025, not sure though it might go through 2050. mad

McHale doesn't get picks, he just gives them up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure we get another pick this year but I could be wrong. I know we have one coming from Miami but that is lottery protected this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston owes us a 2010 2nd rounder from the Gerald Green trade.

We have two future first rounders from Boston. One was returned from when we traded for Ricky Davis/Wally trade, the other is a top three protected 2009 first rounder.

Miami owes us a pick but its lottery protected this year, top ten protected next year, and unprotected in 2010.

So all we have this year is our 1st and 2nd round choices, other trade picks will come in 2009 or 2010.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The man with the answers....THANKS!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, with that type of knowledge da chise should be in the front office!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we have 2 2nd round choices this year according to nbadraftcountdown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it seems that most 2nd rounders find their way to the NBDL and can't make it in the NBA... but you never know anymore with all the talent that is out there...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CnC's right. I overlooked two conditional second round picks.

Originally in the first trade, The Celtics sent Ricky Davis, Mark Blount, Marcus Banks, Justin Reed, and two conditional second-round picks to the Timberwolves in exchange for Michael Olowokandi, Wally Szczerbiak, Dwayne Jones of the development league, and a conditional first-round pick likely to be exercised in 2008. In the Garnett trade, the conditional '08 pick was returned, and the wolves also got the 2009 top 3 protected pick, and of course Garnett for Ryan Gomes, Gerald Green, Al Jefferson, Theo Ratliff, Sebastian Telfair.

Through the nitty gritty details and our trades involving Boston and Miami, we ended up with their second round pick, which means we pick first in the second round this year....Picks #31 and #34 are ours, plus however the lottery balls bounce on Tuesday.

Good eye CrappiesNCats, perhaps you should be the one in the front office smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, thats only because McHale likes to draft hometown boys in the 2nd round. Give them a chance...

He actually called me a couple weeks ago because he saw me in Foot Locker buying a pair of basketball sneakers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still say Beasley, but they both are looking pretty good. Rumors flying about Miami taking Mayo. If you told me the Wolves were going to draft Mayo a year ago I would have thought they won the lottery. It's not like there aren't quality players still available at 3, it's just that the Wolves can't ever seem to find the good ones later in the draft...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still want Beasley but was less impressed when I heard his measuring was only 6'8" with shoes on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Id take Beasely in a heart beat!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would still take Beasley without a doubt....probably even take him #1 if we had the pick....but I was surprised that they had him at 6'10" in college and he only measured at 6'8" 1/4 with shoes on!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea,

The Bulls put a ruler to him and he came up about 3 inches short in bare feet 6'7". Not the 6'10" that they touted him in college.

Rose in a heartbeat! Start with a playmaker and you can always add a midsize scorer like Beasley.

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who are the Wolves goign to take with the #3 pick? I originally said the kid from Stanford Lopez but now I am leaning towards OJ Mayo, Wolves need a PG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mayo isn't a point guard....or at least not a true point...he can bring up the ball but I think he would do better not to bring up the ball and to come off screens for open looks or drives....but if Miami takes Beasley then I am all for Mayo.....but if they are leaning towards Love they should trade down a couple spots!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

opps I was wrong, but I hope they draft someone who can come in and contribute right away they need all the help they can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beasley is 6'8 1/4 with out shoes on not 6' 7" I just read an article on ESPN that said that when the bulls doctor measured his height he was listed as 6' 10", but he was shorter and that is heavily weighing their decision to go with Rose. Remember people he is only 19 and will probably grow a little more, also every college player said he was the best player in the draft as far as pure talent goes. If you are a t wolves fan pray that we can some how grab him up, he would give us a talent that can be utilized immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beasley is who I am hoping we can land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got an email from the Wolves yesterday to see if I wanted two free tickets to the draft party tonight. Couldn't find anyone to go. I'm hoping they get someone to contribute ASAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Del be fightin' with himself again. He likes that. 
    • I now boys fight Nice!!
    • Its a great house. Yep its heavy, yep the cover is bulky compared to a single layer, yep I'd buy it again. You can always pull down a zipper or 2 (front and back doors) if you get hot. For what its worth I switched from a Clam Yukon TC (normal sides with a insulated top) both are a similar size. On below zero days in the clam I would have to use a big buddy. In the otter I use a buddy and rarely turn it on high.
    • Ya, right. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA   From a car audio site....MOTORHEADS talkin'...   FlyinMiata9,
      A shorter antenna mast captures a smaller portion of a radio broadcast station's travelling radio wave. That results in reduced radio reception capability. The reduced radio reception capability may never be noticed if only listening to nearby radio broadcast stations in the city. 

      There's no overall magic of one short antenna over another. There are some that include a signal amplifier. They can at times enhance more distant radio receptions, but usually degrade other radio reception situations, often those where there are multiple strong radio signals in the reception area.

      The overall disadvantages of antenna amplifiers for car antennas tend to be far more predominant than advantages. There are some radio signal amplifiers for car antennas that automatically switch "off" when operated in a strong signal area. That can assist clearly listening to the nearby strong radio stations, but reduce the prospect of listening to any some distance away.

      There's always a prospect of the antenna you installed being defective, or not installed properly well mounted to the car's fender for a good electrical radio reception ground plane. Check to make sure the in-line Motorola connector set is fully pushed-in inserted together. 

      A simple way to test the antenna line and system is to tune in a weak AM radio station in the daytime and then grab hold of the antenna mast to detect stronger and louder reception of that weak AM radio station. Your conductive body mass adds some to the short antenna's reception capability. There may also be an initial "thump" sound as the car's radio makes an automatic adjustment of its radio reception sensitivity. If there's no dramatic change in weak AM radio reception, look for an open or shorted electrical problem. Best bet is a full length proper antenna.
    • The replacements most likely have tuning components built in.  And it isn't too big a deal anyway if you have decent signal strength.
    •     What are ya, a parrot? Someone needs to tune you...with 220 volts of inductance. *ZZZZZT*  
    • Well you guys could have given me this info before.
    • Not in disagreement....most Ice gear is though.   Just trying to find some feed back on if it works well and lights up like it should. 
    • My boy Isaac with his PB(and family best) 1lb 4oz bluegill.
    • That is a hog! 
  • Our Sponsors