Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
fishingguy

Larger than entry level boats?

12 posts in this topic

I started a thread a week or 2 ago on entry level boats. After test driving a few I have decided to spend a little more and go bigger. Lunkers, classic deluxes and rebels for example are nice, but I noticed that size boat is a bit unstable on winder days.

So what are your guys thoughts on the next level of boats? My budget will allow me to look at late 80's to early, mid 90's. I realize the bigger the motor the more money. So I'd be looking for something in the 30hp to 50hp. I'm not brand loyal, and don't want to start a debate on the best brand. Any thoughts or recomendations are greatly appreciated!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We had an '87 Alumacraft Competitor 16 CS with a 90 Merc. This was simply an awesome boat. Deep V, so cut through the waves, enough power to ski and cruise with loaded boat, but still pretty easy on gas and not a huge boat.

Might be a bit larger than you mentioned, but I know that this age boat is about in the $4000 range, give or take. Easy to handle with one person, but also can fish 3 out of it VERY comfortably, or even 4 or 5, as we used to do occassionally.

It has higher sides than many similar sized boats, but not as high as a tyee or those larger boats.

We had great luck with it. On Lunds side, I believe the Renegade is the similar sized boats, and they are nice too.

I know they had these boats in tiller version as well (on Alumacrafts, just take the "CS" (Console Steering) off the model and it is their tiller version.

Another boat I am familiar with is the Sylvan, but can't recall the model, possibly Sea Monster or something like that. Buddy had one with a Merc 50 (great motor!, the Classic 50). The Sylvan sat high in the water and was deeper than Lunkers, but not as nice ride or quality of the Competitor. It did the job, but just not as good quality, IMO.

You can't go wrong with the Merc 50 though! They are a bit thirsty for their size, but troooooooooll perfect and smoothly and all day long, and start no matter what. You will want more than just a 6 gallon tank if you are on big water wink

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Box, thanks for the reply. I was hoping someone would chime in on the competitor. In my research That is one of a few I wanted to hear a review about. Thanks!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than pump my favorite brand, I'll throw in my experience in general. By all means, go for the longest hull your budget will allow, up to 18' or so. The longer hulls will handle much better in terms of high speed handling, handling rough water, and general fishability. The extra room you get by going from 16' to 17' in the same boat design is substantial. Also, get the most motor you can afford. If you are looking for a tiller motor, you cannot beat the old 4 cyl Mercury's like their "Classic 50". With 4 little cylinders purring away and it's small diameter prop, it is hard to beat for trolling even with today's technology. It's drawback is that it is quite thirsty.

Good luck in your search!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a used g3 16'5 sport series with a 60 horse yamha tiller on it about a month ago. So far been realy happy with the boat. Been on lake of the woods in some real rough stuff and it seemed to handle it real well. The g3 seems to be less expensive copared to say a lund. The resaon i bought a g3 seemed to get alot of boat for the money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started a thread a week or 2 ago on entry level boats. After test driving a few I have decided to spend a little more and go bigger. Lunkers, classic deluxes and rebels for example are nice, but I noticed that size boat is a bit unstable on winder days.

So what are your guys thoughts on the next level of boats? My budget will allow me to look at late 80's to early, mid 90's. I realize the bigger the motor the more money. So I'd be looking for something in the 30hp to 50hp. I'm not brand loyal, and don't want to start a debate on the best brand. Any thoughts or recomendations are greatly appreciated!!

You better plan on a bigger motor, or you will be sorely disappointed. The next size up (17'-18') requires a motor in the 75+ range. Many guys are running 90-115hp motors on those boats.

A good rule of thumb, NEVER go below 75%-80%% of the max hp rating of the boat.

BYW: I think will be more satisfied going to a bigger rig than what you started out looking at. Boats shrink once out on the lake smile

- WIWF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WIWF,

I should have known better in the first place. But when having to open our wallet, sometimes we don't take our own advice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the Lund Explorer in this size range. Older ones Pre 2004 should be easy and cheap to find now and they are great boats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone for your advice and experiences with all my boat questions in a couple different posts.

I have bought a boat. An alumacraft competitor w/ 70 evinrude. It is 20 years old, but fit my budget and is over all in good condition. Should fit my need very well. Thanks again for all your help!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Those sure are pretty snowflakes..........
    • Misguided by love as pure as the driven snow.  
    •   Yep, am with ya......and most of us thank you. Should not be a difficult concept to understand.....except for a select Jv few.
    • So was I.  When I say "my equipment" won't be freezing up when I am hole hopping with the aid of my toasty warm Otter cottage, part of my equipment that won't be freezing up would be the ez ducer...   
    • Reinhardt was sincere, and I don't believe he was trying to sell anything,  He had a lot of knowledge about meat, and simply wanted to share it.   I didn't fault him for his politics, either.  He was simply misguided on that....        
    • I took Mickey in 2008. Bubbles 4 years later. Not too worried about winning as some on here .....as winning in  those years wasn't really winning, and so far, neither is picking the winner in 16, other than saying you picked the winner and "get it".
    • Had an opportunity to tag along with LeeKen to Bluestem Nature Conservancy and sit in a blind Saturday morning.  Thought it was unusual to see a deer with antlers late March.
    •     I was thinking more like Goofy=Pres. Trump
    • Murphy’s Law   I went out this afternoon trout fishing.  I questioned the wisdom of fishing on a robin’s egg blue sky day.  Trout shun sunlight.  I went outside to check the weather. The warmth of the afternoon coaxed me out of the house.     I fished a stretch I have done well on in the past.  I knew because of the bright sun I would more than likely not do well on big trout this outing.  Trout do not have eye lids and shun bright sun. When I got to the stream the outdoor temperature was 58 degrees.  I took the water temperature and it was almost 50 degrees.  That is well within a good temperature range to score some trout.     I hit the water at 2:45pm.  The sun was high in the sky and not a single cloud was in the sky.  I knew from experience that days like these I typically fished the shaded side of the stream.  There was no shaded side of the stream.      The fishing was tough.  I had lots of follows and flashes at my lure.  None seemed to want to commit.   I decided to look for cover for the trout.  I decided anything to throw a little shade on the trout would make them feel comfortable.     The trout had lock jaw.  I decided to target broken water so the trout would feel secure and come out in the bright light.  They still were bashful.  I decided another trick was in order. I was going to throw in the biggest snarly messes and let the lure drop to the bottom and give it a tweak to start the blade going.  Bang bang and I was in business.  This only worked in deep runs and i lost a few lures throwing into the mess.     I ended the outing with 24 brown trout to hand. The biggest was about 16 inches.  It was 5:30pm.  I usually get out at a bridge and today was nothing different.  I stood on the bridge looking upstream.  There was a sweet log jam just upstream of the bridge and it was in shadows.     I decided i was going to go just upstream in the shadows and cast a few more times. I was still on the bridge looking upstream. I looked at my reel and there was a loop on the spool.  This loop needed to be cast out if I was going to continue fishing.  I decided the bridge afforded the best angle and no trees in the way to cast out the loop in my spool.     I cast off the bridge.  The loop caught and dropped my cast about 15 yards upstream.  It nearly didn't land in the water.  It hit tight to the bank and I had a big snarl in my reel.  I looked down and saw my panther martin was barely in the water.  I decided to pull off some line and get this snarl out.  I made even a bigger mess.     I sat down on the bridge rail and started to mess with my giant snarl.  I again looked at my lure and it was barely in the water.  I was worried about losing the lure because of the snarl.  It was safe and barely dangling in the water.     I  really made a mess with the reel.  I was cussing it and trying to untangle it.  I lost focus on my lure in the water. I was peering over my glasses and really putting all my attention on this mess and I heard a splash sound.  I looked upstream and saw nothing.  I looked back at the reel.  I heard a louder splash and looked over the bridge at my lure suspended in the water.     My mouth dropped open wide and I stared in disbelief.  Me messing with the line caused the lure to jig up and down in the water.  This attracted a predator.  Not 2 inches from my lure was a giant trout suspended and staring at the size 9 gold panther martin deluxe waiting for it to move again.     My reel was still messed up so there was no battling this huge female trout on my reel if it decided to quit dancing with my panther martin and eat it. The bridge was at least 15 feet off the water and the idea of battling a monster trout from above was not appealing.  I worked frantically on the snarl.  It got even more messed up.     My fighting with this reel and keeping one eye on the giant female was nerve racking.  She still was very interested in my lure.  She circled it like a shark.  It was more than I could stand.  I decided if I hooked up with her with this less than optimal circumstances I would lose her and maybe kill her because of the bridge nonsense.     I decided to try to catch her another day.  The reel was non functional and i grabbed the line and lifted the lure out of the water.  What happened next is going to be relived in my dreams for the rest of my life.  The monstrous female brown bum rushed the lure as I lifted it out of the water.  It launched itself out of the water snapping at the spinner.  It was a swing and a miss. I got my wits back together and thought about cutting out the snarl and trying for her. I decided a return trip was on the agenda.  As I write this recollection I smile and cuss my circumstances.
  • Our Sponsors