Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
heat checker

ditches

13 posts in this topic

how come you cant ride a wheeler in the ditches until august but farmers can go out and cut down all the grass and bail it. isnt the the point of no wheelers in ditches to help the pheasant pop. out if im wrong please tell me, but if thats right. two tire tracks in the ditch isnt as bad as farmers going in and cutting all the grass down at the end of june or begining of july cuase that way they are taking down all the habitat right??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you're exactly right, it's the law in order not to disturb nesting sites of any bird, not just pheasants....I've always said, there are two sets of laws, one for farmers and one for the rest of us!! it's the law though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this topic has come up many times before nad I'll repeat what I've said in the past.

We live in the agricultural zone of the state if we're south and west of HWY 95 and HWY 10. We currently have very few riding areas in this portion of the state. Take away the ditch mowing from the farmers, and we'll have no chance of gaining private property to establish areas to ride since the farmers own the majority of the land in this area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't live in that area but it's just another senseless law made up by the dnr. With all the land around do birds really need to nest in the road ditch? Just like certain areas where they don't mow the ditches due to wildlife, just what we need along the highway, grass higher than the hood on a truck, with deer hiding habitat...senseless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The agricultural area of the state has very few remaining fencelines that used to provide habitat for nesting wildlife. The majority of the land around here is row crops such as corn or beans that does little for nesting pheasants.

If it weren't for local chapters of organizations like Pheasants Forever and the NWTF, we'd have even less habitat for the pheasants we do have.

Also keep in mind that some ditches are private property to the center of the road and any travel in them would be punishable under the trespass laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would think that if birds have been nesting there for hundreds of years that they should still be able to do that! Habitats need to be preserved so that sportsman are still able to hunt. I do think that if you can't ride fourwheeler in the ditches for nesting reasons there should be no cutting of the ditches by farmers or the counties though. Otherwise the law really makes no sense at all!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I see on my property, the road ditches are rarely used by the birds, if at all. I'll tell you where I do find them. In my Alfalfa, in my small grain, and in the grass sloughs that I don't cut but I don't think I have yet found a bird nest in any of my road ditches.

I don't think they really want to build them there because it is too close to the road and too much activity causing too much disturbance with moving vehicles and such.

From my personal experience I have a hard time believing that the road ditches are that important to the birds' survival.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem right when one group is shut out of an area and yet another is allowed to harvest a crop. IMO, there is little to no benefit to the wildlife who may be in the middle of a nesting cycle at the time of mowing.

In the case of ATVs where we've gotten a large share of bad publicity, the best thing we can do is first prove that we're a group who can police ourselves and secondly talk to your legislators to have this rule changed.

If we insist on doing this, you can count on farmers banding together and shunning out the ATV riders in MN and pull the plug on any GIA trails that run across their land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that it isn't right to allow farmers to mow the ditches while denying the ATV riders access. I also agree that it is important to be careful about how we would go about changing the law. Ticking off the competition would only serve to a disadvantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...the road ditches are that important to the birds' survival.

I read somewhere that pheasants wouldn't nest within 40 feet of a field edge. If that is the case they wouldn't use most of the actual ditch, but the more of the field adjacent to the ditch becomes suitable nesting by not mowing the ditch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that it isn't right to allow farmers to mow the ditches while denying the ATV riders access. I also agree that it is important to be careful about how we would go about changing the law. Ticking off the competition would only serve to a disadvantage.

agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the banning of riding in the ditches atleast for Washington Co was because there was buried wires and gas lines that were being exposed in some areas due to ATVs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you're correct, some counties do have a total ban of ATVs in ditches. Washington County being the most notable. Blue Earth County was also thinking of the same but decided not to because of the efforts of a local ATV club.

This brings up another point. The club mentioned above has since disbanded due to lack of interest and declining memberships. It takes work and many hours to continue to do what this club did while they were active. They had many radar runs in the winter time as well as some summer events. Ultimately, it came down to a few people left and those few were doing the lion's share of the work. Now thye're gone and there's nobody left to fight on behalf of the ATV riders in this area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors