Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Conklin Filters. Yes or No


Recommended Posts

Looking to add a new cir polarizer for my 100-400. Place in town here sells Conklin brand but have not much about them. My other choices are the B&W or Hoya. Any Inputs from anyone. I have been happy wity my Hoya so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy birthday, Paul.

Do you mean Cokin filters? I've been pleased with Hoya and B+W filters, which are top brands and excellent quality. Singh Ray if you can afford them are super fine filters. I used Cokin filters many years ago but don't know anything about their quality these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy birthday Paul!!!! I believe B&W is a slightly better quality than Hoya but of course you also pay for that! I haven't used Cokin for 20 years, they were a gelatin based system back in the film days but I would guess they have moved into the digital realm. I will say you likely will be in the $100 range for a GOOD polarizing filter.

Whatever you buy just make sure that you get a circular polarizer (CPL). These work with modern auto focus systems. You also might consider buying a slim filter as opposed to a regular if you are using it on a wider angle lens. That helps with the vignetting you likely will get at the wider angles. I know you mentioned which lens and that you wanted a CPL but I mention that information for anyone else that might be looking at adding a polarizer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am leaning towards B$W or Hoya. Have you guys used any of the "HD" filters, the supposed super thin filters? I know when I use my hoya on my 17-85mm lense I sometimes get small portions of the outer ring in the images taken at 17mm. I am just trying to decide if it is worht the extra 30-50 bucks on top of the intial 125 price tag. I will be using this one on my 100-400l only unless I splurge on a 17-40L which has the same filter size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert here when it comes to photography, but I say buy it right the first time. Go with the thin so you don't get vignetting. A friend said save the bucks and just crop it out. I am sorry I followed that route. I don't want to spend that much time post processing. I then bought the thin one.

That's just my take. JulieA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, thick vs thin won't be an issue with the 100-400. I shot both styles of filter on that lens with no probs with either. But I agree it's best to get the thin, because you don't want to have to buy the thin down the road after buying the thick now in order to avoid vignetting on wide angle. Never know which lenses you'll end up picking up. smilesmile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.