Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. 😀

  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Wookiee

Sauger and Saugeye -Photo Gallery

Recommended Posts

This is dedicated to those that feel they need to hide where they are. I hope you don't know where I am!

babysauger-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sean its a keeper if your fishing the south shore of Woods. If your fishing the Angle its bait. smile The angle is where the bigger saugers live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice fish. That bottom one almost looks like a saugeye, either that or a very light colored sauger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NICE fish guys! ive never seen any sauger that big! The only ones i caught were on LOTW and they were about 6-12 inches!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, somebody tell me what I got here.

look at all the pictures. notice the lack of white on the tail, but also the lack of spots on the dorsal...

oh, came from a small lake in Ontario..

meandmysteryfish.jpg

meandmysteryfishtail.jpg

meandmysteryfishbodyshot.jpg

meandmysteryfishbelly.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tapper I think you could be on to something.... Tail sure looks a lot like a pike tail..

Herm Its name is blue pike, but doesn't mean its like the northern pike.

Jigglestick did the fish have a abnormally sized eye compared to a regular walleye/sauger?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a pic of a blue pike

blue_pike.jpg

They look kind of similar.

And here is a walleye and sauger just to compare to the blue pike.

Walleye

walleye.jpg

Sauger

sauger1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly I think it looks like a blue, but there have been some walleyes thought to be blues that just had a bluish slime on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there was no blue tint what so ever to it.

the outfitter said it didn't look like any of the other walleyes that come of the lake he had ever seen.

the lack of white on the tail and the lack of spots on the dorsal have me scratching my head, thinking saugeye.

I did not check the eyeball, but I'd have to dig the carcass out of the garbage now.

I'm going with saugeye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still I caught a saugeye on pool 4 on friday. They still should have some white on the tip and the spots on the dorsal fin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • I'm OK with the replay if it's used for a challenge.  The automatic review is pretty lame though.   And I agree with Dave about the playcall.  If he would have thrown to an open receiver nobody would have said it was an awful call.  Cousins effed that up.
    • I have an terrova with Ipilot, (not link),   I lay the trolling motor in the bottom of the boat which is stored in covered storage.  It has been fine for several years.   Gets darn cold up around Cook.   No problem.  On the other hand I bring my depth finders and transducer home and store above freezing due to bad experiences with Lowrance transducers in previous years and ambiguity in documents about my elite 7s I have two  
    • ^^^^^^^^   1. zimmerman and stefanski should be fired, cousins benched. (or released)   2. the review by the "experts" in NY has destroyed any legitimacy this sport may have had.   Should note cousins contract. speilman got played. (he should go too)    
    • Ive never really been a fan of replay.  I think we've all seen cases where the refs still screwed it up after replay so we're trading one bad call for another.  Its interesting to hear the rules guy they have commenting on the broadcasts.  They always give their opinions on how they see the play and whether it should be overturned or not.  Yesterday there were 2 reviews that they disagreed with how the officials called the play after review which shows how its all still subjective.    You can look at every single play during a game and probably find something to call on both teams if you look hard enough which I think is a case of what happened during Diggs touchdown that was called back.  Cook either ran into the defender or intentionally tried to block him.  I'm not sure its 100% clear either way and isn't the benchmark supposed to be "clear and indisputable"?  Unfortunately now that replay is a thing pandora is out of its box and I don't think it can ever be put back in.  
    • 1. I think the play call was fine, Cousins just F'ed it up. Play action on first down after you have been running up and down the field on a team is pretty standard but throwing into triple coverage on a play like that is not.   2. Anyone who has ever advocated for instant replay review in sports is now getting what they deserve in my opinion. I could have told you that there would be a natural progression that would lead to this point and beyond. I say get rid of replay review in it's entirety and live and die by what referees call on the field. I was told at the beginning stages of replay that the reason was "so we get the calls right". If that is really the reason, you should be happy they got it right. 
    • Only 2 comments on the game.    1. What a lousy throw by Cousins in the endzone and what a lousy play call.  They were running the ball right down the Packers throats, why would you not keep running it.  2. I think I hate the new PI replay.  To take a touchdown off the board because they noticed someone maybe sorta blocking when they reviewed the scoring play is kind of a joke.  The PI wasn't called on the field and no one challenged it.  When you're reviewing the scoring play it seems like you should only be reviewing if the player got the ball across the line without losing control.  Pretty soon they'll be reviewing every lineman to make sure they weren't holding on the play as well and that none of them moved a thousandth of a second before the snap.  If that happens I hope they also review every defensive player to make sure they didn't move early, hold, or engage a receiver after 5 yards.  It really feels like we've gone too far with this replay thing and they're using it as a answer to everything when sometime you're just exchanging one bad call for another.    I think thats all I've got besides the fact that I haven't been real impressed with the NFC north so far.  The Packers and Vikings look average to decent but hardly superbowl contenders.  The Bears squeaked out a win but they are looking like they don't have much to work with at QB.  And the Lions as usual aren't worth talking about.  
    • The roof is finally on and I got some of the wiring started.  The tin came in over the weekend so I was able to pick that up last night.  I will start to put that up this week if the weather permits.
    • This is where:   Big Dave2 HSO Legacy Member Don't know much about football, huh?   😁   Doesn't matter if we have a good QB. We're a running team! 🙄
    • I hope they draft a good QB next year. That was a shiatty play call on first and goal to begin with. Pack aren't that impressive, neither are the Vikes.
×
×
  • Create New...