Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

2008-2009 Gophers


hamrej23

Recommended Posts

Another great finish by Westbrook. He should have had an And1 when Marcus Landry's feet were moving on the second half step on that wouldn't have made it so close down the stretch. I would have been more impressed had they held the lead the whole game, but you have to take the win. Wisconsin's defense and ability to adjust was going to prevent any sort of blow out. Beat Michigan this weekend and they're in the big dance.

Sorry to rub it in Cooter, but you've got Minnesota avatar duty for another week grin

First season sweep since 1991-1992.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 222
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No doubt, Eddie really drew the ire of the fans on that charging call he made, as well he should have. To take nothing away from Wisconsin, Landry on the pine as a result likely would've made for less drama down the stretch. Heckuva game, almost as exciting as the win at the Kohl Center. Would be nice to see them treat Michigan to a little taste of what Northwestern got this Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to listen to the game, at work, but it sounded great, the barn was rockin. I wish the gophers were a little better on the road they would not be a bubble team, but if they win saturday they should be in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK I am no basketball buff, but Iverson is terrible. He is one of the tallest/biggest guys on our team, but gets handled in the paint and can't rebound. If Westbrook were 4-5 inches taller he would already be in the NBA IMO. What is Minnesota's problem with driving to the basket? They bring it down the court and pass around the perimeter all the time. The only guy willing to bring it inside last night was Westbrook and that was late in the game. Did anyone else notice this? These guys have a long way to go or they will be looking at a first round exit in the big dance...if they make it that far. Either way, I guess it's better than last year and the year before that so there's a positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KMR, perimeter passing and a lack of aggression have been a problem since about mid-January. Teams found out that you need to cut off drive angles and don't let perimeter defenders get split and Nolen and Westbrook will clank shots or be passive. Those are about the only 2 slashers or drive-and-dish guys Minny has. Get too tight or let them get the ball in transition and they'll tear you up. Give em space and they'll beat themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it all comes down to needing to win one game, not getting that win is heartbreaking. Gophers led almost the whole game but couldn't get the stops when it counted. They have to win at least two games in the BTT to be in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, watching Westbrook's 3 tickle the twine after the timeout was a bummer, but I think you set up a shot with the timeout, can't argue that call.

This team couldn't figure out what Beilein likes to do. Rebound and shoot 3's. The Gophers did a great job on the boards, heck they outshot Michigan and statistically outperformed Michigan in most facets in the game. But when you once again have turnover totals approaching 20 you won't win games. So many were unforced. Then you would see Michigan guys drive and dish. At the rate the 3's were falling, it's better to give up 2 than 3. It's not high school anymore, you can't give that help if you can't close out fast enough to challenge the shot.

Poor falf court sets and turnovers are once again this team's MO. A wasted game all around, especially when you see what Sampson was able to do. This team couldn't figure out the zone...you don't beat it by passing around the perimeter. You have to attack the seams with dribble penetration or by finding cutters. Michigan loses to teams that exploit the height difference, which Minnesota had, but the fact that the MN guards couldn't do any post entry or attack the zone meant a lot of slowed down play, perimeter passing, and standing.

Lunardi and other NCAA hoops wonks were talking about 8-9 Big Ten bids...when pigs fly. They'll change their tune by next Sunday. At this point it's looking like this team peaked when they were 16-1 in mid-January and held the #18 ranking, unless they can get to the conference tournament semi's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree completely with the idea to call a timeout at the end of the game. It's pretty common practice in that situation to let your players try to get a shot in transition, giving the defense as little of a chance as possible to set up. Also, notice Tubby NEVER draws up effective plays in the huddle that result in baskets. Go back and watch the game, there were several chances for the Gophers to score off deadball/timeouts where Tubby could have put a play in. What was his play at the end, have Westbrook go back to halfcourt and dribble up to the three point line to shoot? Remember both Wisconsin games where Westbrook was given free reign to score and bring the Gophers back? No set plays!

Also, did anyone catch Penn St.'s coach after Taylor Battle went the length of the court off a free throw to win the game vs. Illinois? He said he felt better with his guard creating vs. a scrambling defense than a set defense. Tubby is a wonderful guy and a great coach, but he messed up big time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, none of the guards know how to throw a post entry pass. The reason the ball never goes inside is because the passes inevitably end up getting stolen. Part of that is on the big guys, but there were a couple of cases of this happening that even the one-who-thinks-I-am-silly Big Ten Network announcers pointed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mensbracket.jpg

The brackets are looking tough for Minnesota. They should be able to take care of Northwestern, but Michigan State will once again cream them. 22 wins would again leave them on the bubble.

AugieAngler1010 brings up a good point about calling timeouts or trying to score before the defense gets set up. There are definitely two schools of thought on that one. For me, if I only need a deuce, I'm not calling the timeout. If I need 3, I want the timeout. But, there are other variables. Considering that this team cannot execute any sort of offense, perhaps asking them to run a play out of a timeout is a poor choice. Westbrook is often at his best when he is creating, this much is true. I was hoping they could loosen up Hoffarber or Abu-Shamala, but instead they wasted whatever set play they were trying to execute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last nights games really helped them. St. Marys lost, and Sienna Won-

Time to watch NDSU tonight, hopefully they can get in!

Hopefully Butler gets a win tonight against cleveland st.

Gophers are in Either way, gauranteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I might be able to back off saying the Gophs need to win 2. I think they need to beat Northwestern tomorrow to get in. It helps that many favorites have won conference tourney autobids. We shall see what team comes out tomorrow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.