fishinphilth Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 This is why they make 10" augers. http://www.nipawinjournal.com/story.php?id=136932 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catchnmall Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 What a monster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishtank Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 Here are some other pics I recieved in an e-mail that said this guy caught it on Mille Lacs. So if you get that e-mail, don't beleive it! This is not a MN Fish! That's how false rumors get started- [image]tp://www.msnusers.com/eh0jb4adpp0b0iuu2ej0a5vs40/Documents/Pictures%2Frecord%20walleye%20010.jpg [image] http://www.msnusers.com/eh0jb4adpp0b0iuu2ej0a5vs40/Documents/Pictures%2Frecord%20walleye%20005.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishtank Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishtank Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abens1078 Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 http://www.wvdnr.gov/2005news/05news003.shtmI posted the above link in the 'Walleye' section of this site. According to West Virginia.....these two fish weigh about the same. Someone is telling a fish story and I don't think it's the Canadian fellow!!!That fish would give me a heart attack if it came through the hole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John19 Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 Maybe putting a 5lb weight in a fish is legal in West Virgina . Not quite sure that fish is almost 19lbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walleye Guy Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 I agree, A 31 inch fish needs to be a heckuva lot fatter than that one to weigh 19 lbs. It is a big fish don't get me wrong but I would guess 12 lbs not 19. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishtank Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 My guess would be that West Virginia's river system has so much lead and murcury, all fish could are twice as heavy as they look. - Just kidding, had to be said when you compare the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbucks Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 I'd have to say Canadians are looking a lot more credible on this one than Pennsylvanians... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts