walley Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 I heard the limit has been decided for LOW this year for ice fishing. I heard no more than 4 waylleye and 8 total. That sounds fine to me, but I also heard no fish over 19 inches unless a trophy fish of over 28 inches. Is this true? If so don't people think 19 inches is kind of ridiculus, I can see nothing over 22 inches, but no three pound walleye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahoe2349 Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 I heard the same thing late last week on the radio. Nothing from 19" - 28" and (4) fish limit !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lundman Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Where did you hear this? I knew they were talking about making some changes, but I havn't heard what they decided. I don't think it will cut back on the number of fishermen that go up there every winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
decoy Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Walleye,Everything you heard is true..... Hopefully, you won't take a kid fishing that catches that first 25-27 inch fish, and wants to mount it.Or hey, bring a camera and a tape measure along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane683 Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 There was a big article on the front cover of last week's Outdoor News. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catfish John Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 From the DNR HSOforum:Special regulations for Lake of the Woods and the Rainy River aim to maintain walleye, sauger populations (2004-11-09)Following an extensive public input and review process, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) announced today that new size and possession limits for walleye and sauger would be implemented on Lake of the Woods and Rainy River starting Dec. 1, 2004. The changes are intended to protect the high-quality fishery for which Lake of the Woods has become famous. Key features of the new regulations are a six-fish aggregate limit during the open water season, of which only four can be walleye. During the winter season, anglers can keep an eight-fish aggregate limit, of which only four can be walleye. In addition, all fish from 19.5 inches to 28 inches must be immediately released. Anglers can keep one fish over 28 inches if they so choose.Lake of the Woods is managed with a maximum target harvest of 450,000 pounds of walleye. The average harvest over the past five years has exceeded 600,000 pounds, with peak harvests of more than 750,000 pounds in two of those five years. The high harvests have been driven by some strong year classes, but most importantly, by a steady increase in angler use of Lake of the Woods. Similarly, sauger harvest in recent years has exceeded what biologists believe is sustainable on a long-term basis. The Rainy River walleye population was included in the special regulations, as the walleye populations between the Rainy River and Lake of the Woods intermingle."Harvests of this magnitude are a concern to us because they can start to negatively affect the size structure of the fish population," said Mike Larson, DNR area fisheries supervisor in Baudette. "The large individuals in the walleye population on Lake of the Woods are not just important to anglers that are seeking a quality walleye experience. These fish also comprise the majority of the spawning population in the lake."The regulations were developed with the help of local resorts and anglers. "The input we received from our stakeholders was very important in developing a socially acceptable and biologically meaningful regulations proposal," said Larson. "The input we received during the public input process was largely supportive of the proposed changes, which we believe are an important step in insuring the future of the Lake of the Woods fishery. The DNR thanks the hundreds of anglers that took the time to offer their comments on this very important consideration." Summary of Regulation ChangesLake of the Woods (including Fourmile Bay) - Walleye opener through Nov. 30- walleye/sauger aggregate limit will be six (not more than four walleye) - walleye and sauger between 19.5 inches and 28 inches must be released immediately - only one walleye over 28 inches may be possessed.Lake of the Woods (including Fourmile Bay) - Dec. 1 through end of February- walleye/sauger aggregate limit will be eight (not more than four walleye) - walleye and sauger between 19.5 inches and 28 inches must be released immediately - only one walleye over 28 inches may be possessed.Lake of the Woods (not including Fourmile Bay) - March 1 through April 14- walleye/sauger aggregate limit will be eight (not more than four walleye) - walleye and sauger between 19.5 inches and 28 inches must be released immediately - only one walleye over 28 inches may be possessed.Rainy River - Walleye opener through February- walleye/sauger aggregate limit will be six (not more than four walleye) - walleye and sauger between 19.5 inches and 28 inches must be released immediately - only one walleye over 28 inches may be possessed.Rainy River (including Fourmile Bay) - March 1 through April14- walleye/sauger limit will be two - no walleye/sauger over 19.5 inches may be possessed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Although walleyes 25-27 inches are nice, chances are a kid who is catching fish like that at a younger age will get one again. Especially with a slot limit protecting the bigger fish. Remember they are the prime breeders. Besides reproductions look better than the real thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Riola Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Are more people going to LOW because of what's going at Mille Lacs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marine_man Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 There's a pretty good thread running on this in the Lake of the Woods forum...marine_man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iffwalleyes Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 here is the thread to the Lake of the Woods forum about this topic. I think every angle has been expressed over there. I personally am all for it. I fish that way anyhow so it is really no change for me except the number I can keep. 14 was plenty of fish but I feel that 8 is still fair. No where else in the state can you keep 8 just remember that. http://www.fishingminnesota.com/forum/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=426547&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=3#Post433488 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Riola Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 I have no problem with 8 that's a good batch of fish...I just think that the debacle on Mille Lacs has led to more fishing on LOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts