Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Straight rear axle or IRS?


Dave

Recommended Posts

I thought this would make good discussion since we've touched on it in another thread.

I haven't measured details but, most unloaded rear straight axle ATVs have lower ground clearance than an independent rear axle, at the tow hitch area.

Some say the IRS rear squats too low when the ATV is towing or carrying a heavy load.

I believe the IRS rear still has about the same ground clearance as a straight axle ATV.

What do you think and why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Yamaha big bear 400. It's a straight axle. The tow hitch is about the only thing I don't like about this wheeler. The chunk of steel that the ball screws into is welded right off of the rear axle, and it's way low. I havn't measured it, but it's too low to tow my fish house. I had to Mcgyver an adaptor so I could tow trailers and my fish house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cousin from Shevlin claims the straight axle machines will actualy go through more mud than an IRS machine.His thought on this is the SRA machines can be leaned from side to side even if high centered over the ruts, where as the IRS machines are stuck if they get high centered.

When I say leaned from side to side I mean they can lift one tire up while driving the other down into the rut further to get to the solid ground.Or they can get one tire up against the wall of the rut to gain forward traction.

The IRS just hangs its tires down off the center , so you can't get the machine to dig in.

Now I don't promote mud bogging on public lands, there are ATV parks to do this and it is legal there.Or if you have private land that is not a clasified wet land.

Benny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did a little test on this not to long ago. I loaded 250# on the rear rack of my 2004.5 Sportsman 500HO. With the rear shocks set on the lightest setting, the rear suspension (with me on board @ 192#)squated 2.75". The Sportsman is rated @ 11.25" of clearance which is not measured at the rear wheels. There is over 13" of ground clearance between the rear wheels. The low point is on the skid plate farther forward. If the suspension squats 2.75" with me and a 250# load, the ground clearance loss is approximately half of the amount of squat (2.75") because of the geometry. The actual ground clearance loss with 2.75" of squat is about 1.5" which gives a ground clearance of 9.75", which is still about 2" more than most of the straight axle machines. If you load the rear suspension with an EXTREME load, ground clearance could become less than a straight axle machine. In deciding which suspension is best for you, you should consider how often, if ever, you would put such an extreme load on the rear suspension.
Sod

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my Kodiak the trailer ball is right off the rear axle ... there is no suspension squat ... only the tires being depressed.

I prefer this over another machine getting *pre-loaded* (squating)with the weight of a trailer because I still have my full range of suspension with a solid axle, where the IRS suspension will be altered due to the tongue weight depressing the rear. The tongue weight does not affect my suspension.

If I am hauling excess weight on my racks, I can adjust the preloads on the shocks for desired performance .. within the boundaries of the shocks.

One last factor that I like about the solid rear axle .. is less moving parts.. or less things to break in the long run. If I want a smoother ride I will decrease the amount of air in my tires.

The machine I have is a Kodiak 450 (03' model).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • could that happen???? yea probably, but unlikely.   i've been chopping or helped or watched cutting spearchucking holes since i've been about 8-10 years old, i'm 65 now, and never remotely seen it happen. ''closest i came was cut a spearhouse hole, plopped the house over it and ended up with a deadhead right smack in the middle of it. the top of the log about 4 ft below the ice!!!!!! 
    • That would be nice til you caught a log frozen in the ice and broke both your arms and your back.
    • Screw your little toy e-augers and chain saws!  😏  😆          
    • the wife and I took a little drive to Arkansas for one more ride. 
    • I get where your coming from Leech. There are some gray areas and loopholes and they know how to work them. These youtube people they want you to be angry, it all plays right into their revenue.   The thing with these youtubers is they unfortunately  have a mass following and they will tell all their fans to show up at the DNR offices, court house, call the office phones etc. And it just drives up their following, youtube views etc. and the result is just more revenue for the youtube channel and people get sucked right in (myself included). Like I said love him or hate him he's generating significant income by doing it and its like a bad car wreck you just cant look away.    In some cases the DNR getting involved the risk outweighs the reward if you get my drift. look at the crowds that came out for him over a misdemeanor jet ski fine in TN. It looks like its straight out of the movie "Time to kill" lol:   More:  
    • Another reply from the DNR Capt.  Sounds like their a bit afraid to dig in and get what the need to prosecute.   Mr. Beeeped-out  😉 I do want to thank you for your time in researching and sending us the information.  The second video in particular involves the CBoyz near Cormorant Village in Becker County.  If you watch many of their videos they are full of violations.  We have met with the County Attorney’s Office and we have been told that unless we can provide a date/time of the actual event they will decline to prosecute.  We have identified many of the players in these videos but only have a date/time of the video release and not the actual date and time.  We have also made contact with them and taken enforcement action in many of their videos.  They are not afraid to film our officers in action.  In addition the first video was a year or two old if I recall.  I will not disagree that when looking at the video there is areas of concern but unless we can observe the damage and be able to testify in court that the wetland was damaged we would likely not be successful in prosecution.  We will continue to monitor their activity and if observed causing damage we will be taking enforcement action.  We appreciate and share your concerns.  If you have any additional information please forward to us.  Capt. Seefeldt   These Jackwads!    
    • Can't stand the guy and don't watch his craap!  I was watching videos on the Sherp vehicle which is pretty cool and these two popped up.  When I saw them mowing over Wild rice beds it [PoorWordUsage]ed me off and got me to send it in to the DNR.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.