Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Moose gone in 10 years?!


Recommended Posts

There was a definite decline, but I've seen more the last 2 years than I did for that stretch after they all but disappeared. I have almost felt like the moose are coming back in NW MN...

I spotted a cow with a calf for the first time near Red Lake last year. Hopefully they are coming back! Also, I believe their numbers in northwest MN are greater than what the DNR is reporting, which is less than 100. Unfortunately they aren't going to do anything to support the NW population because they believe its too late.

If greater densities of deer are contributing to the decline in moose, then the northwest TB zone would be a perfect spot for them to start a rebound. A few years of intensive harvest (including sharpshooting from helicopters) has thinned the herd there based on my observations. We would previously see herds of deer feeding in certain fields on our way to the shack, and they are pretty much gone now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of the Fargo Forum today: http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/335235/

Moose thriving on North Dakota prairie

Lack of parasites may explain success

BISMARCK – Moose populations are declining in Minnesota, where biologists and wildlife managers continue to search for solutions to reversing the trend, but the majestic animals are doing well on the prairies of North Dakota.

By: Brad Dokken, Forum Communications Co., INFORUM

Moose populations are declining in Minnesota, where biologists and wildlife managers continue to search for solutions to reversing the trend, but the majestic animals are doing well on the prairies of North Dakota.

The big question, perhaps, is why an animal associated with the boreal forest is at home on the prairie.

In a word, it might come down to disease. Or lack of it.

According to Bill Jensen, big-game biologist for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department in Bismarck, the increase in prairie moose in the mid- to late 1980s preceded declines in the Turtle Mountains and Pembina Hills, forested areas in the northern part of the state that offer more traditional woody habitat.

Jensen said populations in the Pembina Hills peaked in the early 1990s at about 1½ moose every two miles but declined to the point where Game and Fish hasn’t offered a hunting season since 2005.

“It dramatically declined, and that mimics what was seen just across the border in Minnesota and Canada,” Jensen said.

In the past two decades, northwest Minnesota’s moose population has tumbled from at least 4,000 to fewer than 100 animals, the Department of Natural Resources said.

The success of moose on the prairies might come down to the relative absence of a nasty little critter called the brainworm, a parasite carried by land snails to deer and moose.

Brainworms have no effect on deer, which shed the eggs through their waste, but they’re fatal to moose, Jensen said.

Brainworm correlation

In the early 2000s, Jensen said, Game and Fish sampled brains from more than 3,700 white-tailed deer shot by hunters to test for chronic wasting disease. They also checked for brainworms, and in deer hunting units 2C and 2D of northeastern North Dakota, more than 30 percent of the deer sampled had the parasite, Jensen said, while deer sampled farther west had lower prevalence rates.

The correlation would suggest more moose in the northeast also had brainworm, with fatal consequences.

“I think it really drives the system in some cases,” Jensen said. “There have been all sorts of theories about why moose aren’t doing well, and I think a more careful look needs to be directed at disease.”

Also working in the favor of North Dakota moose is the absence of the liver fluke, another parasite. In the mid-2000s, University of North Dakota graduate student Jim Maskey oversaw an extensive research project into prairie moose as part of his doctoral thesis. The risk from brainworm and liver flukes was part of the research, Jensen said.

“Liver flukes can be very damaging to a moose, but when he looked at moose livers, he wasn’t finding them in North Dakota,” Jensen said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.