Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

L.I. voters reject $400M arena plan


LMITOUT

Recommended Posts

Even people in N.Y. are finally "getting it". Enough is enough.

Can we put this in the stickied stadium thread??? smirk

Quote:
UNIONDALE, N.Y. (AP)—Voters in a suburban New York community already paying some of the highest property taxes in the country overwhelmingly rejected a referendum Monday to borrow $400 million for the construction of a new hockey arena and ballpark.

With 99 percent of the vote counted, the referendum failed 56 percent to 43 percent, according to unofficial returns from the Nassau County Board of Elections.

Supporters of the referendum called it a last-ditch effort to keep the New York Islanders playing in the Nassau Coliseum. The team’s lease expires in 2015 and the hockey team’s owner, Charles Wang, has hinted he may have to move off the team off Long Island unless a new facility is built to replace the 39-year-old building.

He made no predictions about the future in brief comments before hockey fans and supporters at a gathering at the coliseum after the vote. “I’m disappointed, I’m heartbroken,” the millionaire founder of software maker Computer Associates said. He promised the team would remain on Long Island until the lease expires.

Proponents, including labor unions, tourism officials and many business groups, argued the construction project would bring jobs and spark economic growth in the community just east of New York City.

Voters were clearly concerned, however, with the prospect of higher taxes.

“If it was so good why didn’t the owner pay for it himself?” said Mary Beth Molloy after voting no.

Anita Abbenda said she voted no “because the taxes are high enough.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we don't partially fund a stadium for the Vikes, another city will. You gotta pay to play. Just the facts. Where would you put your team? In a stadium you had to pay for in full or a stadium in L.A. half paid for by somebody else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we may never see a team move to california. if one does move there. what city is the nfl gonna use for leverage to force the half dozen teams that 'need' new stadiums into building with public funds?

Well for one, Minnesota will have a vacancy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.