Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Tiger Trout even more rare


Driftless

Recommended Posts

tiger4fx.jpg

One of the "keys" in finding tiger trout in southwestern wisconsin streams is first to have a stream with a "large" population of brook trout. Three of my best producing "tiger" trout streams in southwestern wisconsin have had a significant decrease in the brook trout population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you by chance talked with a fisheries biologist from WI fish and game agency regarding this "tiger" trout? It would be interesting to learn the scientists opinion.

They all look like brook trout to me i.e. all char.

Are you saying this is a new species?

Keep us posted as you learn more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you by chance talked with a fisheries biologist from WI fish and game agency regarding this "tiger" trout? It would be interesting to learn the scientists opinion.

They all look like brook trout to me i.e. all char.

Are you saying this is a new species?

Keep us posted as you learn more.

tigers are a cross between brook and brown, and in my opinion look substantially different from brook trout

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay gang. If State of MN recognizes them I guess that's that. If this was done intentionally i.e. some Mad Scientist cooked it up, it is sad.

If nature did it it is still sad. Each species is a beautiful creature on its own. It would be nice if there was some effort to limit the range of these fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? Are you serious? Surely you can't be. It is the Europeans who brought us the Brown trout, so you can blame the Germans I guess.

Okay gang. If State of MN recognizes them I guess that's that. If this was done intentionally i.e. some Mad Scientist cooked it up, it is sad.

If nature did it it is still sad. Each species is a beautiful creature on its own. It would be nice if there was some effort to limit the range of these fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tiger trout are a hybrid between brooks and browns. No mad scientist made this up. The tiger trout is also sterile so they will not reproduce or take over a stream. The DNR doesn't stock tiger trout they just naturally occur where brooks and browns share the stream. It is not very common to catch one but its not unheard of. I have never caught one but I would love to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is this guy serious???? maybe we should stop tiger muskies too. what is wrong with nature running its course. browns aren't native but they are here and it is nice to see some brook trout populations recovering. a naturally occuring hybrid of these two species that is extremely rare and sterile is a real treat and trophy. they don't affect the population at all. do some research before you post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is this guy serious???? maybe we should stop tiger muskies too. what is wrong with nature running its course. browns aren't native but they are here and it is nice to see some brook trout populations recovering. a naturally occuring hybrid of these two species that is extremely rare and sterile is a real treat and trophy. they don't affect the population at all. do some research before you post.

nature is not running its course naturally.. brook trout are native trout.. neither of the two strains of browns are native... there is nothing "natural".. in the sense that Browns are "invasive"

my question is does the Brook fertalize both Loch Leven or German Brown eggs.. or is it selective?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this guy was serious. I did not know there was a Tiger Trout. Only a few people in these Forums know everything- I am not one.

The history of the import of Loch Leven trout, first to California I believe, is documented in many books and is well known to fly fishing historians. As stated, brook trout are native species. Nature will do what it will. What I feared was that some person,probably one who knew it all, took in upon himself to design a new trout and thus the "tiger trout" We do not need what are sometimes called Frankenfish. And we do not need the silliness of some commercial outfitters who find a slightly anomalous strain of rainbow trout and start calling it the "leopard trout" for marketing purposes.

Nothing that nature makes is unattractive or unneeded. Were I to catch a "tiger trout" I might remark about its unusual appearance and release it.

Happy to have the knowledge about the T.Trout.

And yes, I am serious about all the forgoing. Ha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think it is kinda neat, but from an ecological standpoint, hybrids like the tiger trout, tiger musky, splake(some debate), etc cannot reproduce so as far as it being "sad" or wanting to limit their range, there are no worries about that. Many of these species are planted for fishing, but again there isn't too much concern because if they are bad for a fishery we just stop stocking them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellas, I think it would be better if we reserved the term "invasive species" for some class of flora or fauna that is generally considered to be a nuisance or an "uninvited guest", unlike the loch leven brown trout which were intentionally brought to this country and thus are often referred to as an "introduced" species.

It makes me wince to see the browns referred to as "invasive species."

While a case can be made, and often has, that they displace other species I believe the general consensus would be that they have proven to be beneficial.

Kudzu bad-brown trout good. Asian carp bad-brown trout good. Ash borer beetles bad-brown trout good.

Okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the MN state record tiger was "naturally produced". I think I've read that the MNDNR did indeed breed these things in captivity at one point in time in order to provide some kind of sport fishery somewhere.

Fish and game dept. across the country have tried some pretty wacky things over the last century or so!

I've caught 3 "wild" tigers over the years, all from the same watershed. They are pretty and would probably make a really cool fish mount.

Brian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.