Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
finnbay

Lens Comparison

19 posts in this topic

As Steve and I had talked, I figured to do some side by side comparisons with some lenses at high ISO's. I had my 100-400 and my 70-200 with me today so shot about 200 frames at various ISO's, Av priorities and manual settings. These were taken with gym lighting and I tried to control as many factors as I could. Camera on a tripod with remote release. Both lenses set to a focal length of 150. Shot with large jpeg from the Canon 50D, one shot AF and center weight meter. I have more data than I can process. All I'm going to do to start with is to compare, side by side, the 70-200 and the 100-400 at the same ISO, f-stop and shutter speed. Shots are directly from the camera, the only processing I did was to reduce the image to 600 pixels on the long side and save for web. If you have specific questions beyond what you see here, please ask and I'll see if I can find some data for you. Photos on the left are the 70-200L 2.8, and photos on the right are the 100-400L 4.5/5.6:

ISO 3200, f/5.6 1/125 (Shots of my buddy Spaulding)

28-3200-56-125.jpg56-3200-56-125.jpg

ISO 6400, f/5.6 1/125

28-6400-56-125.jpg56-6400-56-125.jpg

ISO 12800, f/5.6 1/125

28-12800-56-125.jpg56-12800-56-125.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What left and what right? They show up stacked on my monitor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike,

I think the ones on the bottom are the 100-400 and top are the 70-200.

Thanks for the comparison shots Ken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, Mike. Polaris is correct. Screen resolution on my computer allows them to sit side by side. On my other computer the 70-200 is on top and the 100-400 is on the bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are side by side on mine. I think it would have been better to be at the correct exposure for the first two sets. As you ramp up the ISO you make corrections to the other settings. As long as the settings are the same for each lens it would be OK.

The first two sets are underexposed which is not really showing me what either lens is producing in terms of noise. Does that make sense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, Mike. Polaris is correct. Screen resolution on my computer allows them to sit side by side. On my other computer the 70-200 is on top and the 100-400 is on the bottom.

That's what I assumed, but wanted to be sure. Could just be my laptop, but I can't see much difference. I detect just a tad more noise with the 100-400, but overall, they're all quite impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of clarifications. I did not want to have either lens at either end of their range, hence I chose some middle ground where both lenses could reach. I attempted to have each lens as close to 150 mm as I could muster.

Yep, the first two are underexposed. The f/5.6 is understandable because that's as low at the 100-400 will go near that range. The 1/125th was an attempt to show a consistent SS that might be usable in a gym to take at least some standing shots. I would be happy to post properly exposed comparable shots at 1/40th of a second or so if you'd like to see them.

In all honesty, whether it is a surprise or not, what my initial conclusion is, is that they are amazingly close at these settings. The 2.8 would certainly be an advantage when shooting in the gym, but that's not what my comparison was meant to be about. More so, did the lens make a difference as to noise at high ISO's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ISO 3200 f/5.6 1/40 again, the 70-200 on the left or on top

28-3200-56-40a.jpg56-3200-56-40a.jpg

Overall, these are the shots I took:

With the 70-200 2.8, Av priority at 2.8, 5.6 and 8.0, at ISO's 800, 1600, 3200, 6400 and 12800; then on manual f/5.6 and shutter speeds of 1/40, 1/80, 1/100, 1/125, 1/200, 1/250, 1/320 and 1/500 at each of the same ISO's, 800 through 12800

With the 100-400 4.5/5/6, Av priority at 5.6 and 8.0, same ISO's and the same manual settings through the ISO's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ken. I might, and boy its close but I might give a slight advantage to the 100-400. But in all honesty that becomes pixel peeping! It looks like slightly more saturation and contrast in the 100-400 shot which may be masking ever so slightly any noise. That may likely be a characteristic of the lens.

But really look at these results at 3200 ISO. I so no reason not to be impressed no matter which lens is used! I've got around 2,000 shots on mine now but just about all of it is outside shooting. I just haven't had a chance to bring it indoors for a good workout.

I've found the AI Servo tracking on objects moving at me to be very good which was a major performance question I needed answered. It's better than either the 20D or 30D. Not Mark II good but very acceptable with a low throw away ratio.

I still think you've shown just how clean this camera can be. Thanks Ken for your work. I hope to post some high ISO shots in the near future, I'm just too swamped at the moment fulfilling contract work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, Dan. I started taking shots today with good intentions, and soon realized just how much info there was to be had. You could write a book with all the comparisons possible. Bottom line, the 50D is an amazingly noiseless camera if you can expose properly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, you can spend way too much time looking at pixels! I'm with you I've not seen this clean of high ISO's on a properly exposed photo with a Canon sensor. I at this point consider the camera a keeper and money well spent on an upgrade. I can't wait to really see what it will do this winter in our local dungeons!

Any err99's? I've still not had one. I understand we will see a firmware update possibly by the end of the week or next week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan,

Had one err99 yesterday that turned out to be a battery issue. Got the message, turned off the camera, detached the lens and fired up again. Same err99. The battery signal was blinking so changed the battery and message left with no further problems. By the way, that was the first battery change after I got the camera with about 1000 shots. Lots of chimping in there as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff, Ken. Thanks for going through those motions. I also hadn't seen any side-by-side comparisons of those lenses on similar subjects, and was re-impressed with how good the 100-400 can be. smilesmile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noise is the specks that show up in a photo when it is underexposed. The more noise, the less sharp the photo. Noise can get bad enough that sometimes it will show up in lines or "bands". In the film days, the same effect was called grain. An underexposed photo or sometimes a high ASA film would be called "grainy".

The early digital cameras could seldom be used above 400 ISO because the image quality would be so noisy the pictures would be unusable. As digital technology has advanced, the ability of sensors to pick up light has improved along with making the images much cleaner. The last couple of generations have made big strides. Nikon's latest, and now Canon's latest have been the best yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have seen alot of talk about noise so I was concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question, What is "Noise"? Thanks

Its also been called Rap music.... oh I digress! smirk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I'll be getting out again on Tuesday with the bow. It has been very hard finding time to get out this year, between work and a 4 month old at home. Last time out I spent 12 hours in the blind and saw quite a few birds during the middle of the day. Had multiple times where I thought it was going to happen but the Toms wouldn't commit 100%. Making a small adjustment this go round and hoping things come together.
    • Was thinking for hunting and maybe put a plow on it to use at my place up north. Wouldn't be my main driver. Was thinking around 15K for budget but that was before I did much looking mostly on line so far. But might step up in price for the right rig. And a lot of that would depend if I liked the newer V6 engine and 5 speed auto or 6 speed trany and less miles etc. Just by looking at dealer prices on line I would think a guy could find a pretty nice late model for around 20 or less. I think if I bought a nicer later model I would drive it more as they look like they have made the interior a lot nicer and more comfortable than the older ones. On the other hand if I ran across a real clean older one with the in line 6 and not to many miles for the right price that would be an option to. The drawback to a newer shiny one it might take a while before I ran it down the brushy trail.  
    • I am submitting this bird for Sutty on his behalf.     Forum Member: Sutty          
      Date: April 28, 2017
      Team Name: Team 2
      Youth Hunter(17 or younger): No
      Turkey Subspecies: Eastern
      State/Province Bird was Harvested In: Minnesota
       
       
      Turkey’s Stats
      Beard Length 10 inches
      Spur Length 1 & 3/16" 
      Weight 22lb 4oz
      I certify that the measurements listed above are accurate to the best of my ability.
      Forum Member: John Sutton                       Date: 4/28
      Witness: Josh Tschida                     Date: 4/28          
    • Our MN hunt this year was just about as easy as they come.  Sutty and I arrived at different times, he was late, and set up on opposite sides of the field as planned.  I could hear the birds gobbling in the valley below in their usual spot, and they sat there a long time in the cold.  Sutty couldn't see because he was on the back side of a finger of trees because he didn't want to spook anything out since he was late...  Eventually they got down and proceeded to sit on the far hill for a while longer.  I could see a 6 or so males, but suspected most were jakes, and a few hens.     Just when I was getting tired of waiting, about 8:30am, I saw one gobbler enter the field and walk straight towards Sutty's position.  As the bird got in front of Sutty, another nice gobbler came into the field.  I called to him but he wanted nothing to do with me.  Sutty shot the first bird, and the second one didn't know what happened.  Of course Sutty came running out of his blind and scared off the second bird that he didn't even know was there.      Sutty just bought a new house and had to head home asap to help his wife with packing things, and his daughter didn't seem too interested in shooting her own bird this year.  Now that she saw how ridiculously easy it is she probably won't be interested next time either.      I figured I should get to the edge of the field the birds were coming out on, and as I started moving my blind I bumped some hens that hadn't yet come up all the way out of the valley.   I finished getting my blind in place and sat a while, but it seemed we had scared the remaining birds out of the area, or maybe they were just laying low out of the wind.  In any case I went to get some lunch and let things settle down for a while.     After a couple hours of eating and casting for fish that weren't there, I decided I would head back up to sit in my blind.  Just as I reached the top of the hill to see into the field I saw three big gobblers walking across the field.  I ducked down and ran around the edge of the field out of their view to get closer.     I crawled up to about 10yd from the field edge, as far as I could go without being seen, and started calling.  They liked what they heard, but wouldn't commit right away.  After maybe 10 minutes of me cutting and purring, and all three of them strutting and gobbling out at 60-70 yards they started coming.  I couldn't see them well through the brush I was behind, and they didn't want to walk through it.  If I was at the edge of the field I could have shot them, they were within 40yd.  They proceeded to do a big arc along the field edge back to where I had just walked.     After a couple minutes of not seeing them I picked up my call, they gobbled, and then I saw them marching in where I had just walked.  When I last saw them going this direction I had shifted to face that way, I was now facing the tree I just had my back against, which put my butt in a thorn patch and the barrel to one side of the tree.  The birds started walking to the other side, so as they got behind the tree I eased the barrel to the side they were going to come out on.  They started coming up the other side back to the field they were just in and were too close together for a shot.  Finally one eased out in front and I let him have it.  He tipped backwards and rolled back downhill, and didn't even kick until I went over to grab him.  27 yards with the range finder after the fact.       Both birds turned out to be very nice old birds with long spurs.     Sutty's weighted 22lb 4oz, 10" beard, 1 3/16" spurs.  I believe this is his best turkey to date.     My bird weighted 25lb 8oz, 10" beard, 1 1/8" spurs.  My best turkey by weight and age.     Sutty and his bird.        Me and my bird.  I shot from one of the trees above this rock I think.      
    • Got it done in mn.  More to come when I get home.
    • Go to a license agent and buy one for your desired season. Season C, is on process thru May 2nd. Season D, is May 3rd thru May 9th. Season E, is May 10th thru May 16th. Season F, is May 17th thru May 31st. Season F also allows anyone with an unused tag from earlier season to hunt this period as well.   Hope this help PF.  
    • How do the over the counter licenses work this year? I missed last season but would like to get out this year even though I didn't apply for the lottery.
    • What exactly will you be using it for? Driving around the country with the top down, hunting the back woods, fording small creeks?   Do you have a particular budget to stick to?
    • at times the prop will stop on mine, usually when I move it to turn, need to tear into it sometime, I have use fishelectronics for misc. parts
    • I might have to get out and test drive a few and figure out what I like and don't like. Definitly not buying new so Ill narrow it down a bit and then wait for that cherry to show up.
  • Our Sponsors