Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
BassProAddict

Do you always have to mimic local forage?

Recommended Posts

I fish domestically and internationally.I've been exposed to several lakes with different local forage.Some have this, some have that.

Some lakes have never seen crawdads.Some don't have big shad.

Question is, do you have to match the local forage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remeber steve kennedy won a tourney on clear lake last year with a rainbow trout swimbait. clear lake does not stock trout.

i have caught bass out here on a perch colored rapala.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YES.. what does a senko like lure offer for local forage? Nothing. But they work so well!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember my friends, bass have a brian smaller than a peeanut. They aint smart as we are.. .LOL.. they are also very curious creatures, and unfortunatly for them , god did not give them hands to pick tuff up.. so they must put it in their mouth to figure stuff out..

No, you dont have to mimic local forage. In my opinion it doesnt hurt you if you do, but really all you need is their attention and get the curios ennough to want to pick it up and check it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO it doesnt matter cuz think about... if you are fishing where the bass are there is most likely going to be the forage there, if theres too much forage what are the chances he picks out yours? I mean you can make it appear injured but id rather put a perch in an area with sun fish than a sunfish bait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So for all we know we could throw a strobe light that emits sound and scent underwater and MAYBE catch bass???

Seriously then what's all the fuss about super realistic baits? I mean I've fallen prey to marketing ploys over the years and makes you think what the heck are beavers, brush hogs, kreatures etc supposed to be?

A follow up question would then be: Are some baits more "dispositioned" to catch more/bigger fish at certain places than others? If yes, then why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can tell me what kind of forage I'm mimicking with a 5 o'diamonds spoon then I might be inclined to say yes. But no, you catch bass on some of the most obscure things you could imagine. They'll even come up and hit bobbers...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BPA- thats not really what I said... I dont think it hurts for a lure to be realistic. Swim baits do work. But I dont think you "Need" to mimic the forage...

One thing to note, maybe with ultra realistic baits you may have a better chance at a larger fish. Big fish get big for a reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point Deitz. I think that mimicing available forage can play a huge roll at times, but at other times just about anything would pull them in. You can't tell me a wacky senko looks like much of a native species swimming around here. But what about the Bronze Eye Frogs? You get towards the late summer early fall when the frogs make their way off the shore and out into the muddy bays to hibernate for the winter, and you throw a frog bait in the slop and you can have a banner day if you got the right equipment to do it. I had a day last September with my buddy on a metro lake, 2 hours, 10 bass over 17" with the biggest right at 21.5.

The biggest bass I have seen in Minnesota in person, was on the end of my brother's line when we were pretty young. He was casting an old safety pin spinnerbait with a jig head and a plastic sunfish body. That thing came out of the water a couple times and ended up breaking off.

I think there is a time and place for natural baits, as well as baits that look nothing like available forage. It is our quest as anglers to figure out the difference between the two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aside from Kreatures,Brush Hogs and Beavers, what are some of the most bizarre, non-forage-on-earth-is-like-it looking baits you've ever seen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

couldnt it be argued that every bait imitates local forage in some way? a creature style bait that looks like nothing natural above water could look like a crappie or bullhead in a stained, murky lake considering the profile of the bait in the water. and a spoon just mimics the flash of the side of a fish. Texas rigged anything could look like just about any forage. I throw texas rigged salamanders all the time and i cant say i see too many salamanders swimming around the lakes i fish. So long story short, doesnt it just come down to the overall profile of the bait in the water?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would venture to say that lures with the photo finish that mimic the forage exactly may have a time and place to be fished, and actually catch fish, but most of those lures really appeal to the angler, more so than the fish.I think about the bass caught in times gone by on Johnson silver minnows, spinnerbaits, and buzzers like a Floyd's buzzer,and none of these lures is an exact mimic of any kind of forage.Those lures sure do elicit reaction strikes from bass, along with the myriad of plastics that are available.I think it really depends on the lake, and the forage base in that lake as to how close of a mimic an angler has to, or doesn't have to make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    •   Sounds plausible to me.  Is the thickened footing in your mind the same as pouring the perimeter of the slab thicker?  We did an 8 inch perimeter around the 4 inch slab.
    • Yes. But on a post framed building the only think I ever see is a thickened footing and not a foundation to the frost line. A major benefit of post framing is that you install the posts below the frost line so the need for a concrete foundation below the frost line is not needed. If I am understanding the question correctly. 
    • FYI driveway approaches are on the public right of way, you may not block them, or place anything that can injure someone.   May a person park their own vehicle in their own driveway approach?
    • I think they’re more looking at the footings requirement, aren’t they?  Thus the reason for getting the poles below the frost line?   Its the township’s responsibility to figure this out and you have the right to ask them to cite the code they’re following.   I used to live in Isanti County and dealt with a building inspector from my township on the construction of my detached garage.  Things weren’t very strict to say the least.     We built everything by the current UBC code, so I’d suggest first getting a copy of the current version of that since this building will actually be your home.  Don’t take unnecessary shortcuts to save a few bucks up front.  You’ll eventually regret it.   Reading your plans for the slab, it sounds pretty good.  There are plenty of slab homes out there built the way you describe.  What you don’t want is movement.     I’m not an expert by any means but I think footings on your slab wouldn’t be a bad idea and sinking your poles that deep should be a requirement.  If you don’t do footings, at least pour your slab thicker on the perimeter to hold it better.    Your local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) can be more restrictive than code, but not less.  So if it’s defined in the UBC, you have to do at least that much.
    • I’ve personally been on both sides of this.   Used to love getting as much air as possible over driveways but I never understood gunning it on the other side after crossing.  I guess some are just mild adrenaline junkies.    I quit doing that for one, because it’s illegal, and two, not safe if the homeowner happens to be leaving or getting the mail at the time.   Now that I have a posted trail going over my driveway, I find it just rude, obnoxious and irritating to deal with 4 wheelers and sleds gunning it over the gravel and making ruts and eroding my base to the point of it being an expense to either plow and pack the class 5 back in place or spend the money to pave it.  I hate having to bounce over two ruts with my trailers and whatever I’m hauling in them too.   I think that’s the worst part for me.  Either jump it or be mellow on the throttle the entire way over.   I’ve seen trail groomers go around driveways before, making me wonder if that truly is a requirement or they were simply being courteous.  But I agree with knoppers, they should not drag over the driveway.  Maybe they think they’re taking the snow off for ya.  Call the people responsible for the trail and ask them for suggestions.  
    • If you want to get through ice fast and are going to re-tool for it completely, look at a Nils before making your final decision. 
    • I am fully aware of this as are most people.
    • some people are bad apples that give the sport a bad name, I as a snowmobiler have respect for driveways. FYI driveway approaches are on the public right of way, you may not block them, or place anything that can injure someone. trail groomers actually do you a favor by knocking down the bank, to keep it level. unless your groomer was not well trained, they will not groom over your driveway.
    • If code allows post frame for residential construction then by design you don't need a block foundation. 
    • Perfect that awnsers my question. Why spend $250 when I could spend $150 on a new lazer bit and cuts faster, it’s more durable but still about same weight and a chipper but. Really a no brainer. What are you seeing for drilling time with that 8 inch lazer?
  • MWO