Scott M Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 UTAH AG: BCS may violate antitrust lawsby Associated PressSALT LAKE CITY -- Utah's attorney general is investigating the Bowl Championship Series for a possible violation of federal antitrust laws after an undefeated Utes team was left out of the national title game for the second time in five years.Attorney General Mark Shurtleff contends the BCS unfairly puts schools like Utah, which is a member of a conference without an automatic bid to the lucrative bowl games, at a competitive and financial disadvantage."We've established that from the very first day, from the very first kickoff in the college season, more than half of the schools are put on an unlevel playing field," Shurtleff said Tuesday. "They will never be allowed to play for a national championship."BCS administrator Bill Hancock said he couldn't comment on the investigation until he had seen something in writing from the Utah attorney general's office."We just don't think it's appropriate to comment until we've seen something to comment on," Hancock said.The BCS is designed to pit the top two teams against each other in a national championship game each year. It uses a complicated formula based on human polls and computer rankings to determine who plays in that game, which Shurtleff contends is biased.No. 1 Florida and No. 2 Oklahoma have one loss each but will play for the BCS national championship Thursday night in Miami.The Associated Press crowns its own national champion based on a poll of sports writers who are not bound to vote for the winner of the BCS title game. Many fans are clamoring for voters to put Utah -- the nation's only undefeated team -- in the No. 1 spot in the final poll.On Friday, Utah became the first team from a non-BCS conference to win two BCS bowls after it upset No. 4 Alabama 31-17 in the Sugar Bowl. Utah also beat Pittsburgh in the 2004 Fiesta Bowl to complete an undefeated season.Shurtleff said his office is still in the initial stages of reviewing the Sherman Antitrust Act to see if a lawsuit can be filed. To succeed in a lawsuit, he would have to prove a conspiracy exists that creates a monopoly.Shurtleff said he prefers that BCS officials and university presidents solve the problem of excluding some schools from a national title game by creating a playoff system, but added he's committed to doing whatever it takes to produce change.If a lawsuit is filed against the BCS, though, Shurtleff could end up suing the state he represents. Utah is a member of the Mountain West Conference and Utah State belongs to the Western Athletic Conference; both leagues are members of the BCS."We have to determine the answer to those questions," said Shurtleff, whose planned investigation was reported by the Deseret News on Tuesday. "You determine who it is you're bringing action against."The BCS is comprised of the 11 Football Championship Subdivision conferences, the director of athletics at the University of Notre Dame, and representatives of the bowl organizations.Under the BCS, about $9.5 million is distributed among Conference USA, the Mid-American, Mountain West, Sun Belt and Western Athletic conferences for making their teams available to play in BCS games.If a school from any of those conferences receives an at-large invitation to play in a BCS bowl or championship game, those conferences get an additional 9 percent of BCS revenues among them, which come from television rights and the bowls themselves.If more than one school from those conferences make the BCS bowls or championship game, those conferences get an extra $4.5 million for each additional team.By comparison, the share to each conference with an automatic berth in the BCS -- the ACC, Big East, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-10 and SEC -- is about $18 million each. When a second team from one of those conferences qualifies to play in a BCS game, as the SEC accomplished this year with Alabama and Florida, that conference gets an additional $4.5 million."It's not about bragging rights. It's a multimillion dollar -- hundreds of millions -- business where the BCS schools get richer and non-BCS get poorer," Shurtleff said.****************************************That's a new take. There has to be something better than the BCS, I'd like to see a playoff. If basketball can do it, why can't football? I don't buy the student-athlete is missing too much class angle, basketball gets away with it for the whole month of March. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jigging-matt Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 Utah does have a pretty good case on why they should be #1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so haaad Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 And another year of bowls is upon us and another cry for a playoff system. When will they listen??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLY Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 Never, too much $$$ involved in the bowl games and confrence title games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandmannd Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 They may have a good case but this stuff isn't for gov't to decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 $$$ or not, who wouldn’t want to see an undefeated team play for a National Championship?They proved plenty of times that deserve a shot. I don’t care what conference you play in or how big the school is, you put the right combination of players and coaches together and you can make a champion.Good for Utah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so haaad Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 I agree. I personally don't think Utah is the best team in college football, but they weent undefeated. So let them prove how good they are on the field. I think they could still make a ton of money with an 8- or 10-team playoff system, if not more. There would be more games played and more opportunity for sponsors. You could also keep the other lower-tier bowls for those teams not making the playoffs. And just like college hockey, they could still have the conference championships. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMR85 Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 have the current bowl sponsors pool the money they donate together. then divide it between the schools who finish 1,2... in the conference with the winner getting the most. have each round of the playoffs worth a certain amount of that overall money with the national champion receiving the most. put EVERY conference champion in the playoffs. this shouldn't be that difficult to figure out, but when it comes to money everyone is going to put up a fuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Joseph Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 They will listen, (like our gov't will listen) ONLY when "we the people" speak up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deitz Dittrich Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Wasn't Boisy St. or however you spell it undefeated over the last 2 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMR85 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 i think it was 2 years ago they were unbeaten, taking OU in the Fiesta bowl. then missed it by one game this year, they lost to TCU by 1 point in their bowl game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.