Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Fighting Sioux Hockey


backstrap

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We'll see how Michigan does in the national tournament. They haven't exactly played a long list of top teams like the Sioux have. Check out their schedule on USCHO and you'll see what I mean. I would say that the quality of competition in the WCHA will give those schools a little head start come tournament time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats easy...... H.E double hockey sticks NO!.. grin.gif

With the overall parity in college sports spilling over to Hockey as well I'd say it's a roll of the dice like last year.

Lets not kid ourselves although the WCHA is still the best overall conference in the nation it's still just a shell of its former dominating self and doesn't have the great teams at the top like in years past.

I know the die-hard WCHA fans that still have their blinders on like over at USCO, RUBEChat, and other forums are using the standard talking point excuse that the WCHA is so deep now which of course I don't buy into at all.

Michigan just lost their 2nd best player "kolarik" which will really hurt them if he can't come back plus they are very young team also. I don't consider playing the Defending National Champions 5 times exactly a weak schedule, the rest of the country's Hockey top to bottom has made up considerable ground on the WCHA. We are NOT a shoe-in to have teams playing and winning the National title year in and year out anymore.

Flame away boys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they're saying kolarik isn't supposed to miss that much time. he is a major part of the scheme for reds team though. i would agree with peirbridge that a lot of ground has been made up to catch up with the wcha, should make for an interesting national tourney. besides playing defending national champs 5 times you can add miami(who does have a weak schedule), ND, gophs, badgers, as well as BU & BC. weak schedule? come on man.

MAIZE & BLUE!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michigan has the 14th most difficult schedule and Miami has the 32nd hardest. Take the for what it is worth but the top nine on the strength of schedules on the list are all WCHA teams. The WCHA has a 28-15-8 record against all conferences or a .627 win percentage the closest conference to that is the CCHA at 29-25-5 or .534 win percentage. This should provide a fine opportunity for the WCHA to win yet another title. Currently there is a possibility for 7 WCHA teams to make the national tourney and if it wasn't for the automatic bids to the AHA and CHA the WCHA could have 8 (the 8th team in Minnesota). The next closest league is the CCHA with the possibility of 4 teams. From the looks of the current numbers the WCHA certainly is the strongest league in college hockey.

Research man do some before you rag on the WCHA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just shows how bad it is when teams like Duluth, Mankato ST, Wisconsin, St.cloud and yes even the Gophers are even being considered for the NCAA tourney!

The .627 is the worst winning percentage the WCHA has had against the rest of the country since they started keeping statistics......try to keep up YAK!

Its your choice to keep your Northdakota/wcha blinders on but....

Carry on! grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: NAPAFISH
Last time I checked .627 is better than .534

What does that have to do with our main point that the WCHA is not nearly as dominant as in years past and one of reasons why as good as North Dakota is it's still going to be tough to win it all with the obvious parity we have in College Hockey ?

On a side note the 8th best team in CCHA completed a season sweep last night against the so called 7th best team in the COUNTRY Mankato State Mavericks last night 4-2 at Mankato.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused bridge, do we quote the past do we not quote the past??? According to your previous posts you don't care about the past. Well, at least not anything older than the last nine years. I'm just using your rules and talking about this year. Oh by the way, can give me the WCHA's out of conference winning percentage for the last ten years? Or are you talking out of the wrong end again?

Just because the Chokers suck this year doesn't mean the league sucks too. Pierbridge you definitely need a hug. Maybe there is a support group or a twelve step plan you can get involved with. I'm sure there are other concerned Choker fans that will lend you a shoulder to cry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: yakfisher
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but this forum is about the Fighting Sioux not how bad the Gophers are this year.

Bridge go high-jack someone else's thread

Highjack?.....I didn't high-jack anything I responded to posters in this thread that have more to say then "The golden chokers suck this year" "I would much rather hang out with some rural Canadian guys than a bunch of spoiled city boys." with my reasoning why I didn't think North Dakota would win it this year nothing off topic on anything I wrote at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yakfisher, if we want to start calling people out, why don't you get off your nodak finger givin soapbox and come to realize that nobody is saying the sux don't have a tight squad this year. the points brought up are simply saying it's not going to be a cake walk for ANY wcha team to take it down this year.

so, maybe, in fact probably, there is a support group for "poor und fans who are always getting picked on." come on, man.

tj, i know it's okay to be a homer, i'm from kato, but come on. mavs winning it all? it'd be a huge step for the program to make and win one in the national tourney, if they can hold on and not peter out against an ugly tech squad to end the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: PierBridge
"I would much rather hang out with some rural Canadian guys than a bunch of spoiled city boys." with my reasoning why I didn't think North Dakota would win it this year nothing off topic on anything I wrote at all.

So, you're saying that you would rather hang out with Sioux Hockey players than Gopher players??? That is the first thing that you have ever written that makes any sense at all.

So you think the Sioux have no chance because the Chokers suck and that makes all of the WCHA weak. You refuse to support anything you write with actual facts. How much worse is the WCHA's record this year over years past? You made the statement support it.

I think the Sioux have as good an opportunity to win this year as they have in any of the last 6 years, it is up to them to take it if they want it. Could Michigan beat them? Yes they could but I think it is more likely that Michigan is going to lose to a WCHA team once again in the tournament. I just hope the Sioux lose a game or two over the next few weeks to put that bad taste back in their mouths and keep them from becoming over confident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: yakfisher
 Originally Posted By: PierBridge
"I would much rather hang out with some rural Canadian guys than a bunch of spoiled city boys." with my reasoning why I didn't think North Dakota would win it this year nothing off topic on anything I wrote at all.

So, you're saying that you would rather hang out with Sioux Hockey players than Gopher players??? That is the first thing that you have ever written that makes any sense at all.

So you think the Sioux have no chance because the Chokers suck and that makes all of the WCHA weak. You refuse to support anything you write with actual facts. How much worse is the WCHA's record this year over years past? You made the statement support it.

I think the Sioux have as good an opportunity to win this year as they have in any of the last 6 years, it is up to them to take it if they want it. Could Michigan beat them? Yes they could but I think it is more likely that Michigan is going to lose to a WCHA team once again in the tournament. I just hope the Sioux lose a game or two over the next few weeks to put that bad taste back in their mouths and keep them from becoming over confident.

Those were quotes from you and varmit at least you have some hockey knowledge and you are not all insults and derogatory like Varmit.

Do you read any of these post I try to highlight things to make it easier for you to understand?

Posted by PierBridge above in this post.

 Quote:
WCHA is not nearly as dominant as in years past and one of the reasons why as good as North Dakota is it's still going to be tough to win it all with the obvious parity we have in College Hockey ?

So now were back to a quote from you...... grin.gif

 Quote:
I think the Sioux have as good an opportunity to win this year as they have in any of the last 6 years

I agree.

I'd add more but I don't want to confuse or offend you anymore.... grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh... keeping it simple. My kind of language. Here's how I'm doing it again this year. When the Fighting Sioux are winning, the flag keeps flying in my yard. It's on an extended run right now. With a little luck, I may need to replace it for next season. Now give me a cocktail or two and I get the hankering to add some complexity. As I look at it right now, it's fluttering pretty good. It must be windy. That's as complex as it needs to be. Much rather be be wailing on a #2 rodent team or better yet knocking them out of #1 than dealing with this M = Mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.