Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

The future of the 3 point stance.


croixflats

Recommended Posts

I see Goodall looking at possibility of a ban of the 3 point stance on defense say this may minimize concussions. Will this play a big factor in slowing down some of theses quick orientated defenses.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-superbowl-goodell&prov=ap&type=lgns

Also take a look at what was said on labor negotiations. To me it sounds like a step in the right direction but with a battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is going to be a reality sooner than later. Being a parent of a son who has had two concussions in two years playing football, it is concerning. I think there is more than the 3 point stance that causes these issues. He took both of his shots in practice, going against a stronger bigger kid that was simply a horse. My son was not afraid to go head to head against him and did get the tackle both times and both times got his bell rung hard. Both resulting in swelling and large bruise on his forehead. I am more of an advocate for safer helmets than changing the game. His helmet (supplied) was not much different than what I used in the 70's. Padding was similar. I am surprised money does not change the effect of this. Oh well we will see how it all plays out i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it'd be a RADICAL change. You'd be crippling defensive linemen, and the running game would be completely different.

I'd expect a LOT more passing, and the mold of an NFL lineman (both offensive and defensive) would change a lot.

Defensively, I would envision a lot more of the 1 or 2 down-lineman look, a la the Ravens and Pats of recent years. Lots of guys standing up and shifting around.

Offensively, much more short passing, and zone running plays, or read plays

I'd like it for the impact on the players health, not so much for the integrity of the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silly going to a 2 point stance. They should consider getting rid of all hard padding and only have pads to protect against abrasion, so yes back to leather helmets without face masks, and no hard shelled shoulder pads. Do that and people won't use themselves as a weapon. Bring back football to what it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eliminate the 3 Point stance and you end up with 2 stand up ends and a bunch of big LB's blitzing into the middle every single play. That will eliminate hard hits?

These guys get to make there living playing a game, they take a risk every time they step on the feild. Either the NFL learns to accept that or they completly ruin the league with stupid rules like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silly going to a 2 point stance. They should consider getting rid of all hard padding and only have pads to protect against abrasion, so yes back to leather helmets without face masks, and no hard shelled shoulder pads. Do that and people won't use themselves as a weapon. Bring back football to what it was.

I think it's the head leading hit and people using themselves as a weapon as mentioned that is the cause of this epidemic of concussions. Let's get back to tackling the ball carrier instead of db's launching themselves at the upper body parts of the ball carrier trying to jar the ball loose. Fine if you want to try punching the ball loose but the airborne db leading with their shoulder or helmet has caused way too many injuries; sometimes to their own teammate doing the same launch from the other side of the ball carrier and they collide.

One can argue that football players know the risks and I have no argument there but there are ways that you can maintain the integrity of the game without unnecessary risk of injury. I've enjoyed watching this game for almost 40 years now and it was just as enjoyable back in the olden days when defenders tackled instead of launched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to understand how a 3 point stance correlates into concussions.

I agree the league would be better served of eliminating these launching maneuvers.

I think these moves have been glorified in movies such as Any Given Sunday and movies as such and now with the younger player it has moved into the culture of the NFL.

I'm all for hard hits except for using the body as a missile projectile. I am surprised we have not seen as many neck injuries as concussions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I hate just about every new rule regarding defense in the NFL, I'd actually be all for banning the "launching missile tackle". Make the players tackle again! I think that would actually improve the game's defense overall. How many times have you seen a defender launch himself, only for the guy with the ball to not go down and run for an extra 10 yards or more? Make them actually tackle and you cut down on alot of those "bonus" yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There hasn't been an increase in concussions at all probably a huge decline if anything. Concussion awareness, detection, concern and admittance yes.

I don't see a snowballs chance in Ell of this rule change coming to fruition.

Dead-on Pier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: croixflats
I'm trying to understand how a 3 point stance correlates into concussions.
\

Me to? Like I pointed out I think it would lead to more big hits?

helmet to helmet contact on the line. You don't have to suffer a concussion to have brain damage; frequent helment to helmet contact over time could lead to brain damage. Supposedly using a 2pt stance would reduce this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Your kid needs to stay with him!👍
    • My kid was eating in Beverly Hills and ran into this guy. Talked to him a bit and wished him luck in the game tonight.     
    • 🤔as a recovering machinist!🤣🤣that must make me a recovering welder!
    • As a recovering machinist, I can appreciate that.  If the spec is 0.001 - 0.0015, then clearly the correct measurement is 0.00125, duh…
    • I just figured that it is easy enough to just get a 3 bank so when the boat is not in use I can keep all 3 batteries charged. I have not bough a charger yet, maybe I will give it some more thought. Edit: After thinking this over, with the size, weight, and heat output of the charger (as well as the cost) I think it makes sense to just buy a 2 bank charger, I have a smaller charger i can use on the starting battery when the boat is sitting at home. Forgive me, for i am a retired engineer and I have to obsess over everything...
    • Congrats on the motor!  I think you’ll like it.   I can’t say much on the charger location but I’ve seen them under the lid in back compartments and under center rod lockers.  160 degrees is more than I expected to hear.   Curious why you’re opting for a 3 bank charger with a 24V trolling motor.  Unless you don’t feel you be running you big motor enough to keep that battery up as well?
    • I did buy an Minnkota Ulterra, thanks for the recommendations. I had a bunch of Cabela"s bucks saved up, which helped. Now i need to get an onboard battery charger. Where do you guys mount these things in your boat? The manufacturer I am looking at {Noco genius) says tht their 3-bank charger will run at 160 degrees, seems like a lot of heat in an enclosed compartment? Thanks for any input on this.
    • You're very lucky a troop of Sea Monkey's didn't carry you away.   
    • Wasn't terrible at a state park beach. Antelope island maybe.  I wouldn't recommend it as a beach destination tho.  Figured I was there, I'm getting in it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.