Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Favre


Scott K

Recommended Posts

Moss doesn't solve everything, look at what he did for the Raiders. They had a few good years, well Cunningham had one good year, so did Rogers so don't put him on the pedastal of cheese just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rodgers is still a Packer, therefore he stinks! If he is at all any good they will improve upon 6-10. Oh yeah I forgot that great QB's do go 6-10. I will be patiently awaiting the he only has played one full year banter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah I forgot that great QB's do go 6-10.

They do when their defense stinks. Oh yeah, we've already been down that road and you fail to acknowledge that little tidbit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Favre

A league spokesman denies speculation that the NFL has already approved the mass production of Brett Favre Vikings jerseys.

"We wait until there is a player contract that has been approved," Brian McCarthy said. "Nothing has transpired from here." Reebok is believed to have produced screens of the No. 4 jerseys, but they could be destroyed if Favre doesn't end up with the Vikings. He's almost certain to, though, and the merchandise could threaten the single-season record for jersey sales. Jul. 2 - 4:54 pm et

Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Culpepper sucked? Where were you and exactly what were you doing when he was in his heyday here? He was #1 overall pick one year in my fantasy draft. Guess what- I was living in Kansas City and played in a league with all KC fans then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: zamboni
BTW- he made the cover of Madden, so couldn't have been too bad.

Ah yes, the two measures of greatness....making a pro bowl and being on the cover of Madden. rolleyes.gif

You're right- he musta sucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Culpepper 2004=

4,717 yards, 39 touchdowns, and 11 interceptions

Rodgers 2008=

4,038 yards, 28 tds, 13 ints.

Much better than anything we have had here, as you said- in a long time. Thats not including rushing yards/tds, do you really want me to go there? Culpepper was a ton better than Rodgers, until his knee injury. Go to Caribou- get some coffee gang. As far as Cunningham, I could put up highlights of the Vikes/Packers game in 98, but I don't wanna hear ya whine about the whoopin' that was dealt out by the purple that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why didn't you use Culpepper's 2000 or 2002 stats?

I'd say that the 2000 stats should be used in this argument since that was his first full year in the NFL. Comparing those numbers to Rodger's first full year (2008) they look pretty much identical, and if you think Culpepper was great then apparently you're saying the same about Rodgers since their stats are essentially equal for their first year in the league.

box.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why didn't you use Culpepper's 2000 or 2002 stats?

I'd say that the 2000 stats should be used in this argument since that was his first full year in the NFL. Comparing those numbers to Rodger's first full year (2008) they look pretty much identical, and if you think Culpepper was great then apparently you're saying the same about Rodgers since their stats are essentially equal for their first year in the league.

box.gif

Uhh, too much thinking and not enough testosterone, LMITOUT. A football fan should NEVER let reason overcome insanity! gringringrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Limit- I am not the one saying the Vikings haven't had anything bad here in years- I am only pointing out we indeed have had some decent QBs here, and recently. I do think Rodgers is the second best in the division, and that will be eclipsed once #4 signs here. Cutler is #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Limit- I am not the one saying the Vikings haven't had anything bad here in years- I am only pointing out we indeed have had some decent QBs here, and recently.

OK, then why did you drag Rodgers into the fold? It's just the same p-ing match where to prove a point the other teams player is dragged into the discussion for no reason whatsoever instead of going on defense and defending the question at hand.

Apparently the Packers are the benchmark or gold standard because their players get compared to A LOT in this forum. smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the Packers are the benchmark or gold standard because their players get compared to A LOT in this forum. smile

Because we have fence jumpers like you dragging them into the conversation everytime we mention how bad the packers suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: leechbait
I see you are caught in a catch 22!!!! I can't wait either, only time will tell and it's fun raising hell w/you cheddarheads in the mean time.

You and I need to have a few Pabsts and talk football!!! GO Packfarves!!!

Anytime, but I'll bring my own beer... lol!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.