Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BottomPounder

Insulating attic?

6 posts in this topic

I live in a story and 1/2 built in 1964 and was wondering about insulation in the attic. We have a problem with keeping it cool on the second floor in the summer. It has bat insulation in the 2by6's and was wondering if it would be better to put more bat insulation in or blown insulation. Thank in advance to all that replie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say story and 1/2 in that year I picture a knee wall rafters and then collar ties forming a flat ceiling. You can add insulation to the horizontal ceiling, knee wall, and outer wall.

You really can't add insulation to the rafters. What little air space that is there now is for ventilation. Which brings up, are your soffits vented. Your right around the time when no homes with that type construction were vented. Your rafters and or roof deck may not have held up because of that. Sagging roof and rotted roof deck would be worst case. Some homes have been around for a lot longer then yours and haven't suffered from not being vented. Adding a roof vent and venting the soffits would be recommended but in some cases I think it could create a problem where there wasn't.

If you want to add insulation to the rafters best thing would be to remove the sheetrock, fir out the rafters and add pink foam, a vapor barrier and re-rock it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not a good idea to double up bat insulation because you are making a double vapor barrier. That sometimes makes a problome with mositure building up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all batt insulation has kraft facing.

Friction fit, has no facing at all and is the recommended insulation for a retrofit.

ST brings up some good points about available space and ventilation, things that only you can answer.

Its very common to add more insulation to an attic, and the easiest is to blow in on top of the existing batts.

Keep your ventilation channels open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be better off spending time looking at adjusting the air flow in the duct work so that more occurs in the upstairs. There may be baffles in the basement that you can adjust to limit in one area and open up in another. If you get it figured out you should label each so you know where to move it to for summer or winter.

A cheap solution may also be a ceiling fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

me and my uncles have been working on remodling my aunts 1940's or earlier house

we had space to put in 2 air returns to the second floor.

that solved her problem of keeping the up stairs cool in the summer.

also the extirior walls and rim joist were spray foamed. like fish house spray foam. that cut her heating bill in half last winter. only time will tell what it will do in the summer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors