Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
CapnJack

Map Create borders?

Recommended Posts

I have a Lowrance Expedition C with the Map Create dvd. In the manual it states that the max

mapping memory is up to 1 GB. I've tried various borders trying to get either north-south or east west(which is what I want) and cannot get it under 1 GB. If you start with Minnesota and try to get all of the east coast it goes over by just a small amount. Anyone here have any experience with this? Thanks for any help. Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try removing some of the details on the map. Get rid of what you don't need, restaurants, hotels, site seeing stuff... etc, etc. This will decrease the size of the data. Still might be too large, but you might get close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same setup, and have had success with a 2GB chip. It has been a long time since I set up the boarders, but I think I divieded all of north america into 5 zones (maps). If you reduce the amount of information inside the map, it will also help. Like getting rid of all of the elevations etc.

If you don't figure it out, post back, maybe a phone call could help you out. I had to call lowrance and they talked me through it the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess when I did mine I just did the midwest Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa and the Dakotas. Didnt really check to see what the memory on it was. Send lowrance a email and they will help you figure it out. The one question I had about it they answered to a t. The little I do know is that you can make up to 5 different cards so you may have to do a different card for each time zone (or whatever you prefer for regions. If you could use a bigger chip then it would be solved real easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that the bigger chip idea may not work. I went bigger and it didn't fly - or maybe I was just too impatient and didn't wait long enough to get it all loaded. I do know that when you include some of the highly populated areas things add up fast. I bet you can cut out some of the categories of info and get a whole lot more geography on a card. How many pizza restaurants do you really need to have listed? And the info probably will be out of date in a heartbeat anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe these new map creates have way more than before, but I want to say I downloaded map create 6 for all of mn, just didn't put roads on there and any other useless stuff for a boat, and it only took up 16MB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. I've been trying to get a 2-gig card to work but I think I might have to take some of you're advice and pare down some of the information. Yeah a Lake Master chip would be sweet but this deal I found on-line including the software,a card reader and a blank 256 chip which works well came to a grand total of 129 bucks. Yes that price is correct. That includes the Expedition C. I have Mn. and WIS.on the 256 chip which is probably 99% of which I will actually use it for. Don't ask for the HSOforum as that deal is long gone. I think it was a screw up someones part because it was gone the following week. They don't even carry Lowrance anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, this is a bigtime HSOforum that sells computers and all kind of electronics that I've bought other stuff from. I think this was just a screw up on their part or they were just clearing out their inventory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • sorta helps, I'll find it...  thanks... me and google just got it.....     have to go see!!
    • Hall of Fame? You must be joking...... Every player starts out like that. No one starts out with a 23 m dollar contract. He still averaged about 15 million per year for his career, that average probably goes up if he plays past 2018. I think he will be ok.
    • Joe was also the 74th highest paid player the year he won the MVP. You may say he is over paid now but he was underpaid 1st half of his career. @Bobby Bass   I don't think Joe is a future Hall of Famer, not even close to borderline but a great player none the less. I think if the Twins would have made a deeper playoff runs back when Morneau was healthy and Santana was Cy-young would have helped. But Joes playoff numbers are terrible. I could maybe see HOF if he would have stayed at catcher his entire career though..... But he will more than likely end up winning a gold glove at 2 positions, and with one being catcher that is pretty elite.
    • Big Dave most if not all pro contracts are paying you for what you have already done with the hope that you will continue to produce. Looking at todays contract Joe's is not to out of line for a future Hall of Famer
    • Great! He is finally earning a contract close to what he is being paid. 
    • thx.  directions are on the site below. just across river from college    http://www.munsingerclemens.com/the-gardens/munsinger-gardens 2 areas, up top and down by river
    • Free agency is far from a sure thing, if there are young centers out there (big if) you have to compete with maybe 10 or 20 other teams and pay way over what you should. You have control of nothing and are at the whims of a player everyone is chasing. Same with trades, very easy to swing and miss. By most account we were in on Ryan Johansen with the Preds but Columbus wanted Jones over Brodin and I don't blame them. 
    • Good stuff but time wiill tell. Not buying the "oh we might lose him as a UFA"...so what, with that kind of money we could buy just as good and younger to give us more of a future...which we desparately need to be thinking about.  Fletch is walking a tightrope and it is going to break IMO.
    • Come on BB, you are better than that. You as much as anyone know that ONE player doesn't make an NHL Team a Stanley Cup contender so why put that blame on him. Sure, a player like Crosby certainly helps, but we aren't talking about the money that Crosby is getting here either. Comparing Koivu's contracts to equivalent players with similar production is quite compelling. He has performed better than many of his peers for his current contract and with the lower AV of his new deal if he continues similar numbers it will be a bargain. I wasn't too happy about the NMC either, but I take that as a bargaining chip so CF didn't have to go with a longer term deal. 2 years is sufficient and I think it works well for both parties. You are right, there are many people out there with more knowledge about the market and what he could have gotten elsewhere and when it may have made sense to sign him, but the fact is you don't want to wait to sign him until after the season for if no other reason at all than to allow him to be a UFA and hear other offers. This will be my last post about the Koivu extension because clearly we don't see eye to eye on whether it made/makes sense, but I assure you there are a large number of "hockey minds" that are in agreement with me on this. Here is some afternoon reading for you: https://www.hockeywilderness.com/2017/9/20/16332552/mikko-koivu-contract-extension-minnesota-wild-criticism-overpaid-chuck-fletcher-cap-space
    • Red admiral i believe.
  • Our Sponsors