Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
walleyeking19

stabalizer length

7 posts in this topic

I have talked to many bow hunting "experts" and they say you don't want a really long stabalizer on your bow. but yet i see bows with 10" stabalizers on them. Doesn't that get your bow unbalanced?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually a longer stabilizer will usually balance the bow in your hand better. The reason you don't see longer stabilizers on hunting rigs is that they get in the way when bushwhacking through the woods, don't fit in bow cases, & overall are just not practical. We're not shooting 10 rings in the woods... just need something to absorb a bit of shock and add some forward weight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to be in the "short stab." club but after the suggestion of some of the guys at Cabin Fever I tried a couple of the 10-12" stabs. I think they do a better job of calming down the bow wandering while sighting and they don't get in the way as much as I thought. Now I've got an 11.5" stab and it does great. I bushwack a lot and hike all over the place. Except for keeping it in the case I have no complaints.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wieght gives you ballance, length gives you stability. Freestyle target shooters like that long length for more stability. So a 10 ounce stabilizer that is 4 inches long or 30 inches long will ballance the same but the 30 incher should give you tighter groups. Then there's the vibration factor. Lots of the short stabilizers help reduce it different ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't take much to stablilize most new bows. A $20 S-coil will give you all the dampening you need. I like the added length and a little extra weight for the balance and the stability. I cna really trell the difference between my scoil and my vibracheck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as others have said, its not really the length of the stab that stabilizes the bow, its the weight of it. The length does help stop bow movement. The longer the stab the more it will correct shaking and such. Its why you see target bows with 36" long stabilizers.

Shorter stabilizers are easier to move around in a tree, I for one like the added confidence I get from a slightly longer stabilizer. I think mine on my bow is a 12" doinker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • You almost need to put a guy in his face and play the rest of the PK 4 on 3.
    • About time!!! Stalock on his way up...hope they play him soon.
    •   Tiger meat on a cracker is delicious.    Yes, "may". I don't have a link to his page and I haven't been to it in years so I have no idea.I'll admit that I'm more than likely wrong and just jaded from years of working in internet marketing but I'm not gullible enough to take the word of random internet peeps. Do you have a link to his page so I can verify?
    • Also check out "straw bale gardening".  
    •   My folks liked them.  The Hubbards are large and the flesh is quite thick.   Plants in late april is jumping the gun.  Liable to freeze, even with global warming.   reasonable chance of frost there until middle of may.  You want the dirt to be warm, so think of them like tomatoes or cucumbers.   seeds rot in cold soil.    frost kills plants
    • Speaking of desperate snowflakes...... check this out.   Can't wait for the hearings on Cspan.... Legogate.   Or maybe batgate....   (no I have no idea of the credibility of "heatstreet" so read at your own risk) (owned by dow jones, so part of the mainstream media at least sort of) https://heatst.com/politics/democrats-to-investigate-after-trump-official-makes-lego-batman-joke/  
    •   I doubt it.  Its hard to go back and even if you did most of the damage has already been done.  Besides it would be admitting failure, not many people like to do that and I've seen no evidence that ownership believes it did fail  Perhaps to them it didn't, with 2 sites they might be taking in more money now due to more ad spots to sell.  Although the question is longevity, do ad dollars start to suffer as users leave and content dwindles?  For awhile its not hard to pump up the stats and make the site look good to advertisers with number of visits and page views, etc.  However, if an advertiser looked at the site for themselves its easy to see all the sub forums that haven't had a new post in months or that most of the views and clicks are coming from threads with Trump in the title.   Forums as a whole are also LONG past their prime and are quickly fading out.  Facebook groups and other social media are taking over.  Why log into many different forums when you can simply log in to facebook and have everything right there along with all of your real world connections?  Advertisers are likely to be focusing more of their ad dollars on the platform as time goes by.

    • The pipeline being built is a good thing. Gutting regulation for the sake of gutting regulation is stupid - and that seems to be his tactic. Some regulations are necessary. The "illegal flow" had been declining for years; attributing the continuation of that arc to Trump isn't really sensible. 
    •  Ooh landed that one in 4 minutes.     P.S. Of course you haven't yelled at me you only go after the defenseless.  We all know how bullies work.
  • Our Sponsors