Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sandmannd

Anyone wanna work with a rookie

9 posts in this topic

I'm new to hunting. I did my hunters safety last year just to be more informed. Got out a little, missed some birds and didn't get any, but still had a blast. Anyway, anyone wanna take someone out and show me the ropes a little? I'll help pay gas and all that jazz. You can blast me an email at s_e_hendricks at comcast dot net.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure you'll find someone willing to split expenses with, especially this season.

I've had "projects" each of the last three years and while I enjoy introducing new people to the sport, this season I'm planning to make it more about the new dog. Going apprentice-free this fall!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandmand shoot me an email, I am interested. rrgierke at yahoo dot com.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHOA! If this cuts into your fishing time. There will be big trouble Shane gringrin One of the best times of the year to be on the water and you want to waste it on smelly old ducks and geese.(no offense hunters Shane just needs as much grief as possible)I have been there and done that also. Be careful whoever takes you out though he is not called Mr. Injury for nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey sandmannd just wondering if anybody was got back to you taking you out hunting this season if not get back to me im sure i could hook you up sometime this season and but you on some ducks. i cant tell you here i hunt but i sure can take you do some good hunting holes in southern mn if not good luck this waterfowl season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shane I will get you out with me a few times, if the old holes haven't dried up...I got the gear so yeah, it will be good time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hunt a bunch just west and south of the cities for ducks, and often hunt alone in a 17 foot canoe. I could always use another rower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Danz and jparrucci, shoot me an email at s_e_hendricks at comcast dot net. I've had a couple of replies but I'm always into meeting more of the outdoor folks and having a good time. Wade, we'll get out for sure this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • If you consider the "thugs" as part of the protest group (which DC police even said they weren't, but only intended to do damage) then the answer is yes. The labeling of all because of the actions of a few is something I have and always will disagree with.
    • I clearly stated protest marches and not specifically the womens march. So,knowing that do you still disagree with me?
    • No where yesterday during the woman's march was there violence or racism exhibited. Intolerant towards things Trump wishes to eliminate yes. The damage by vandals occurred on Friday by a group of thugs who had only one purpose in mind and that was to destroy property and create trouble during the inauguration. (DC police even said that and they expected it.) Yes the Woman March did leave garbage to clean up, which can be expected. If you have ever had the experience of cleaning a (female) public restroom you would find out they have a problem with garbage cans. I'm sure most did take their signs with them in the same manner most ice-fisherman take their garbage off the lake with them, but there are some who don't. The top photo is the only one that is of the Woman March.   
    • Can you explain why you feel that way?    
    • I do believe you are out of line with the racist, intolerant, vandals comment.
    • I will slow it down. I did not say you said it was rigged. Your party,however went after Trump for not saying he would accept the election results and then turned around and in large numbers proclaimed they didn't accept the results. I don't expect you to understand the hypocrisy of that but at the same time it's there.   Conjecture. You don't have a single slice of evidence this is the case and you would be wise to retract it because it has no basis. None. Yet even though this is the sort of thing your party is outraged about by the right, you are actually more extreme about it on your side.    While there is direct evidence that the DNC blatantly rigged the Democrat primary in favor of Hillary and committed all manner of things that came out in the Podesta/DNC emails there was no outrage on your side over what they did. Yet you jump on Trump for something that was sold as truth when it was literally the same fake news the Dems have been pushing all cycle.    Considering the contributions that flowed into the Clinton campaign coffers in all manners it would be best to leave that sleeping dog lie.    In the meantime. you might want to take ownership of the mess that the racist, intolerant, vandals that made up the protest marches because you own that.    
    • i always thought they were about identical smoked  
    • Rumor has it they are running a story next week regarding ice fishing and CO. 
    • Looks like one to me. Nice catch  
    • I thought you lefties were against fake news.   Guess not so much anymore.   At least you haven't attacked Barron Trump, yet, unlike your fellow travelers. 
  • Our Sponsors