Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Snake River  King

1988 bass tracker changing motors

6 posts in this topic

Hello I have a 1988 bass tracker and it has a 45hp mariner on the it right now and with 2 people and all the gear it will go about 26-28 mph and Im looking at getting a 1988 johnson 70hp vro motor and was woundering how much faster will it go? are those good motors? Its supposed to be rebuilt and runs strong thanks SRK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much faster? Maybe 32 mph at WOT?

Are they good motors.. well, in my opinion anyway, the 60-70 hp johnson 3 cylinders motors weren't the greatest motor. The main problem they suffered from was the water intake into the block being to low (I think it was too low if I remember right) and burning up a cylinder. The VRO system in that year wasn't too bad, and hopefully if the motor's been rebuilt they put a new VRO pump on it.

I would ask why it was rebuilt. If they don't have an answer I would be inclined to shy away from this motor - it could mean they don't know why, but rebuilt it, which means it could be succeptible to the same problem.

You do understand that you'll have to spend some money to re-rig the boat with OMC controls, right? You won't be able to connect the merc controls to the Johnson motor.

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant help ya with speed? But what do you plan on doing with the Mariner? Ya gonna list it on FM forsale?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, is the boat rated for that much horsepower?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep the boat is rated for a 80hp motor, I plan on rigging the boat myself and does come with new controls so I might have to buy different cables but thats it, and I might put my 45hp motor on a pontoon thanks for all the input guys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plan for new cables - Mercury cables won't work with Johnson Motors.

Good luck on your project!

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     Well just in some of the data and articles I read, which might be fake news I don't really know. It looked like the amount/lbs of walleye were in the lake just that there are a lot of large ones and not many small ones.......The data also showed that the bait fish were really dropping in amounts/numbers.....   Interesting to see that a report from someone like yourself is just like I head from the guy I met at upper red. Thought maybe he was pulling my string or something when he told me the fishing was great, then seen the DNR shut the lake down.
    •   Thats the thing, I can't find really any good pictures of one. I was given this auger a few days ago buy a guy who didn't use or want it.  He only used it once when he forgot his power auger. There is a string with a price tag on it for $89. It was sitting in his machine shed in a corner collecting dust.   I cleaned up the auger and touched it up. There was a slight ding in the auger flighting up a turn or two from the bottom. That I fixed. However,  the mounting head for the blades didn't have any of the original powder paint damaged, none had flaked off, and there was no rust spots. The blades where rusted up but not damaged. I assume if they were bent the powder paint would have expanded & flaked off. The two blade angles seem to look like they are how they should be. So I'm really kinda leaning that the blade mounts might not be bent with the way it looks.    If I look at the shaver blades from the top or bottom they look like a normal shaver blade. However, when looked at from the side they seem to have a very slight curve that matches the blade mount. Did jiffy have a design like this different from the others? So I'm confused.......what would be the odds of both the blade mount sides being bent to what looks like exact angles.......if they were bent what is the odds of both blades seeming to conform to the bends without cracking or breaking........I measured from one outside blade edge to the other and got 8in......but I know 8in augers can go from a range of 7.5in-8.5in depending on brand and other things......If the blade mounts were bent I would think some powder paint would have flaked off.......I'll do the ice bucket trick.....was hoping someone had one or could chime in. It looks a little like a design between a flat shaver and a curved blade if it's not bent......I do really like the design if that is what it is meant to be. I also love the blade cover being a rubber that is tight and doesn't fall off. I just really don't know if they are bent or not bent. Confusing.....Also wondering if flat shaver blades would work on it or if I would need to find a set of Jiffy blades that had a slight curve to them.....
    • I wax every exposed part of the string. 
    • BD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i wasnt good enough for a lakeside lot!!!!!!!!!!!
    •   Is that you, or the back of BD then?
    • well, that picture he posted?????????? that was my boat and i was part owner of that dock if that tells ya anything!!!!!!!!! yea he's been there!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    •   Ok but you told BigDave huh? Maybe he'll give it up?
    • Hi guys,   I am a beginner and just purchased a Matthew Halon bow last year.  However, I haven't waxed the bowstring and figured I should do it before this season starts.   My bowstring doesn't seem to have any colors on it showing where to avoid waxing it.    Can somebody explain or direct me to a video on where to avoid waxing on the bowstring of a Matthew Bow?  I know the part about rubbing the wax into the string good, but I am unsure which part of the bowstring to avoid waxing exactly.    Thank you. 
    • North of the cities.........................south of I Falls!!!!!!!!!!!!! west of st cloud!
    •   Come give me a north-south zone at least!
  • Our Sponsors