Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Ryan Dempsey's Lower Fox Monster...


Recommended Posts

The fish is a true monster, but obviously has a 5-6 lb meal inside. the biggest fish I ever personaly have wittnessed is 54 inch fish two years ago with a 28 in girth. we guessed the fish at 40-42 lbs. IMO the fish he's holding does not exceed 55 lbs. But I'm no expert either. no matter it is a true trophy and a fish of a lifetime. nice catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, per Mn DNR regs a picutre is allowed, just as b1gf1sh said.

The standard weight calcs go out the window on a fish like this. It looked like me last night after the Easter dinner. Weight of this fish is a guess, however, it's huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: 10,000 Casts
That Kitty would make a good breakfast for that Monster! Now that I think of it, I m going to call Muskie Innovations and see if they will make me a 25LB Bulldawg!!! grin.gif

I think it's the other way around grin.gif

....and you'll have to double the size on that bulldawg order ;\)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't cast it, just troll... ;\)

Is that a Flathead? I was thinking channel and I am not a good guesser on Kitty weights. Caught a few Channels on the upper red in Fargo, definitly a good time. And yes, I know that thing probably would go after a muskie and tear it apart \:\/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s just say it would be a blast to watch the two monsters go toe to toe. cool.gif

That’s a flathead and was 48x30 and 52lbs

I can’t imagine a musky with a 33” girth. I think I would literally wet myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the dimensions are accurate, I just doubt all the calculators/tables. Too many variables, and not enough fish of that size caught/killed/weighed to verify if it's accurate over a certain size constraint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JRedig... I did have that same thinking til I read an article in the summer 2002 issue of Esox Angler titled, "Do the Math: World Records & weight formulas" by Pete Maina and Ross Fisher... Sure there are variables... but table by Ross Fisher regarding the actual weight vs formula weight was pretty accurate... 34 fishes 44.75lbs or over was recorded... and the average disrespancy of actual weight vs formula weight was minus 0.12lbs (1.92oz)or minus 0.31% per fish... thats impressive... But then again... shouldnt believe everything you read in magazines or see on the tv LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: Rebel9921
JRedig... I did have that same thinking til I read an article in the summer 2002 issue of Esox Angler titled, "Do the Math: World Records & weight formulas" by Pete Maina and Ross Fisher... Sure there are variables... but table by Ross Fisher regarding the actual weight vs formula weight was pretty accurate... 34 fishes 44.75lbs or over was recorded... and the average disrespancy of actual weight vs formula weight was minus 0.12lbs (1.92oz)or minus 0.31% per fish... thats impressive... But then again... shouldnt believe everything you read in magazines or see on the tv LOL

I've used enough statistics in my life to know there's always a way to make them look good for the argument i'm making. Remove a point here, ignore a rule there etc etc. I think the Dempsey fish moves beyond the boundaries of the fish that are used for a study like this. Gotta keep in mind, the average size of recorded fish or known fish has change somewhat since an article in '02.

34 is hardly enough to prove anything considering the number of fish world wide over 45lbs that potentially exist. Such a small sampling to try and make such gross guesstimates on.

Besides, does it really matter?

-Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.