pickinupafew Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 is tree related, it sparked a question I have had regarding a shot I took this past summer. Plus, I am making a conscious effort to start being more active and contribute to this fantastic forum... I have lurked on a regular basis for too long. So, here is my question... In the below posted photo, do you think the detail in the tree is too much for being so strongly back lit? I look at this image from time to time and just can't decide if the detail in the shadow side of the tree is too distracting over all. Obviously I have pushed the dynamic range way past what would be considered normal, but that is the effect I was chasing. Just not sure if the shadow detail is complimentary to the image or distracting. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmeyer Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Pickinupafew,I personally don't think it is distracting. I don't think it's accurate with the amount of backlighting but I think it gives some texture that works.That's a great image. I like it a lot!!Thanks for sharing. I can't wait to see more.Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dbl Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 First off I am glad you will be contributing! Second I have to tell you I love this shot. It could even be considered photo art but that is neither here nor there. I don't think that the detail in the tree shadow detracts at all from this image. It has a very distinct HDR look to it to me, and I have always associated strong detail in the shadows to HDR. I'm not sure there is anything I would change to this shot at all. It will have a different appeal to different folks, but It works for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Wow!!! Thats an awsome picture. I don't think the tree or the shadows are distracting at all. If you could tone down the sun so it's not taking the eye away from the rest of the image that would be an improvement IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 A great artistic image. I wouldn't change a thing. Very nice work, and we're glad to have your voice and visuals joining the group! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pickinupafew Posted March 1, 2008 Author Share Posted March 1, 2008 Thanks for comments folks. I appreciate your input.Still not sure which way to take the image. Your comments reinforce my thought that the shadow detail does not take away from the overall image. Maybe it's just time to make a 16x20 print, hang it on the wall, step back and evaluate from there.Still, just something about the image has me in limbo yet. I'm sure you folks know what I am talking about when evaluating your own work. Something just doesn't click yet.Moose, I would love to bring a little more detail into the sun. But, there is no information recorded for me to work with. That was one of my first responses too. Just nature of the beast I guess.Thanks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakfisher Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 I like the vibrant surreal colors, especially the greens that were brought out of the shadows. It is definitely art and I definitely like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 If you want more detail into the center of the sun, you can clone in color from the colored portion closest to the center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pickinupafew Posted March 2, 2008 Author Share Posted March 2, 2008 Thanks for the tip Steve, I'll give it a whirl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts