walleyematt Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 idk what all u think but i think the DNR should drop the slot to 4 per person what do u all think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tisosy11 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 A statewide slot limit would be nice at 15 or 16 inch.I don't mind the 6 fish limit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyepatrol Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 There's a post down this page a little that has extensive discussion on this topic. I think you'll find a lot of people's thoughts on it there. The post is titled:"Proposed walleye limit change?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team Otter Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 4 fish, no minimum length and 19 - 28" fish have to go back; 1 fish over 28" may be kept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cribbageboy Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 That is a great idea TO! I think if they dropped it from 6 to 4, people would be much more selective in what they were keeping. A minimum limit wouldn't even be needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrophyEyes Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 TO, I 100% aggree with you. Who needs more than 4 fish in a day? If you are feeding an army go buy fish at the grocery store. I would even make the upper limit 30 inches. I would discourage anyone from taking a big fish out of the water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L_Cappo Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 thats great but i have seen alot of ppl this yr keeping the 6 to 8 inchers.they say we drove a long ways we r going to keep everything we get.i think there should be a minimum length.why keep the dinks? go catch some perch and leave the little walleyes alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team Otter Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 We'd rather have them keeping the smaller fish than the 19+" fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walleyeking19 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 i've always thrown anything over 20" back into the water. thats just a family rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team Otter Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 That's a good rule to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrophyEyes Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 A 6-10" fish has far fewer eggs/spawning potential than a 15-26" fish. I don't care if they do keep the small ones. Personally, I go for the 13-15" fish for keepers. I only keep one or two fish per trip because I don't need anymore than that. As for the Trophy fish, there is no need to keep them for an actual replica, graphite has become just as realistic. Slots and rules are only there for the lowest common denominator and the weekend warriors that don't care about the sustainability of our fishing resources. True sportsman/women would never think "me" first, fishery second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted March 3, 2008 Share Posted March 3, 2008 In general it doesnt hurt a lake biologically speaking to take small fish out of the system. It also in general doesnt hurt biologically speaking to take out large fish according to a SD fisheries guy i spoke with. He told me once over 27-28" they have done their duties as far as spawning goes. But releasing a 27" might be someones 30" down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts