Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

  • 0

lcd or plasma ?


dogs

Question

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This recent thread discussed this and might answer some of your questions: http://www.fishingminnesota.com/forum/ub...rue#Post1179215

Plasmas, nor any TV whether it be LCD, Plasma or DLP, NEED to be calibrated, but they can benefit from a professional calibration which can be expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The laser TV's are still a thing of the future. If you do a search of "laser tv's" with your favorite search engine, the prices are in the air and the new technology doesn't have everyone sold. Your best bet is to find a good LCD or plasma and go from there. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I found a site that did a comparison between the two. Some of the results were:

Plasma has more options when it comes to larger screen size (over 50"). LCD has the edge on screens smaller than 37".

This is mirrored when it comes to price. Plasma has the edge on larger (50"+) whereas LCD has the edge below 37". In between they are relatively close.

When it comes to picture quality, plasma typically can produce better contrast ratio so the difference between the darkest black to the brightest white is more significant, which can produce a much richer, crisper, clearer picture.

The gap in viewing angle has narrowed and the LCDs are now competing well with the plasmas.

LCD is not prone to screen burn but plasmas are closing this gap. LCD picture sticking is less of an issue as well. For both of these concerns, normal viewing shouldn't present much issue anyway.

LCDs have a higher potential for developing bad pixels than plasmas.

LCDs have the upper hand with power consumption. Typically they consume 30% - 40% less energy than comparable size plasmas.

Now, I just have to decide which way I'll go when the time comes.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

One thing to add on the contrast ratios is that LCD's have improved dramatically in just the past year or two, so that information above may be a bit outdated. Sure, a lot of your bargain basement LCD's don't have the best contrast ratio, but that's why they sell them at Walmart too. Some of the better LCD's have a contrast ratio of 15000:1 or greater now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The date of the document I referenced was April, 2007. Technology grows way too fast.

But that was much of the information in the document as well. While there are differences in product quality, that difference is narrowing rapidly.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When I bought my plasma the salesman said LCD consume less power than plasmas but plasmas consume less than tube tvs. The one thing that swung me to a plasma is they have a glass outer screen where LCDs are like a computer screen. I thought the glass would be better in the basement in case or when the kids hit it with something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I just bought a Samsung 46 inch LCD and it rocks. I think viewing angle is a problem on the expensive plasmas since at the store I had to stoop down to see the picture clearly for them. A big showroom with a lot of choices helps you see the difference for yourself. DLP's cost a grand more. Make sure to have the sales guy toss in the HDMI cables free since even the three foot length is $50. If you have Charter and the Moxi box switch to the new DVR so you can use HDMI and a better remote/menu system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

LCD

Pros

--better in bright environments

--use less electricity

--very little risk of image retention(burn in)

Cons

--Depending on screen refresh rate may suffer from

screen "jutter" or artifacting when viewing fast moving

sports (hockey)

--Will not diplay true black color (although I find this

difficult to detect)

--A bit more expensive than a comparable sized plasma.

Plasma

Pros

--Does a very good job with fast moving sports(hockey)

--Displays the best black levels

--Can be used as a space heater in the winter \:\/

--Better price points for larger screens

Cons

--Screen glare in bright rooms

--Potential image retention (burn in) concerns

--Higher power consumption

--Throws out alot of heat

I personally have a 42" plasma, it is in a pretty dark room, and I love it.

One additional note, don't get caught up in the 720P vs 1080P hype.

720P is more than adequate in almost all situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

 Originally Posted By: sand_pike

Cons

--Potential image retention (burn in) concerns

Just a minor comment. Image retention and burn in are two different things. Image retention is temporary, burn-in is permanent.

Image retention isn't terribly uncommon, true burn-in is pretty rare these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.