hitthebricks Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 I'm wondering why the manufactures suggest attaching it to a front side cleat instead of the bow eye. HTB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 CatManLee Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 Probably because it's easier to access. It's not much fun trying to tie/untie a drift sock with big waves splashing in your face! I'm also sure it's so you see it or have a better chance of seeing it, so you don't put the hammer down with it still there? I know I'm not the only one to forget the drift sock out. That's my thinking behind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 hitthebricks Posted August 17, 2006 Author Share Posted August 17, 2006 I was thinking maybe it was to catch less wind, but I still don't understand it, with a second retrival line its easy to retrive and deploy, but I have taken off with it still in the water. HTB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 LwnmwnMan2 Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 Quote:I'm wondering why the manufactures suggest attaching it to a front side cleat instead of the bow eye. HTB Maybe if you stil have the trolling motor down, it's not as likely to catch?? I suppose some guys will just run back up to the start of the drift with the motor, although I suppose that if it's windy enough that you need the sock, that you're going to have to have one heck of a trolling motor to run back up through those waves, pulling the sock?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
hitthebricks
I'm wondering why the manufactures suggest attaching it to a front side cleat instead of the bow eye. HTB
Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts