Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Gadgetman

fly reels for ice fishing?

Recommended Posts

Ok, whats with the fly reels showing up on ice rods? I assume it is a matter of eliminating line twist? Does it make a difference, and if so would those of you that use them recommend them. Does a guy need to buy a real nice one or is just a basic modestly priced one good enough? Just curious, dont want to miss out on a potentially great idea, but also have no other need for a fly reel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started out using a flywheel 30 some years ago.

Before that I used eye screws on a cut off broomstick.

Been using a spinning and baitcasting for a long time now and won't go back to a flywheel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a pic of a rod setup w/ fly reel. I think the rod is a Thorne Bros Quiver Stick. If I remember right, Tom got the idea form one of the guys at Thorne Bros (Pat or Matt maybe). There was a thread on this topic earlier in the season - It is suppose to eliminate line twist issues you can run into with spinning reels - If you are use to a pistol style grip on your ice rod, it takes some adjusting to holding with a fly reel.

3399457262_6bb2797021_b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I got the idea from Pat Smith at Thorne Bros. It works great. The rod I have it on right now is a Thorne Sweet Pea site rod, but next year will run one on a Quiverstick as well. I just put backing on there to get started and test it out but need to add some fly line to basically get more backing on it. Once I have the full amount of backing, it will be a little faster bringing fish up. Right now, I only get about 6" of line per handle turn, with fly line on there I should be in the 9-10" per handle turn. I have it set up with the drag essentially backed off completely. I switched hand position when this pic was taken, but when jigging, you just grip the reel and use your fingers on the spool for tension. You control the drag for each fish, rather than adjusting on the fly (pun intended). I absolutely love it for panfish. There is no twist at all in the line on that rod, and I used it in that configuration for nearly two months of ice fishing. One other positive for using fly reels, they fit in rod bags a whole lot easier than conventional spinning reels. I took the line out clicker out of my fly reel too, as buzzing every time you pull line out to drop a lure gets too much attention from others, even if you are far away. Another thing I really like is being able to work the jig all the way down the water column. I had fish race up from the bottom in 30 f.o.w. to hit a jig 6' under the ice just from working the jig from the time it hit the water.

It takes a bit of getting used to after turning the handle on the spinning reels most of the winter, but once you get it down, it is a lot of fun. Fly reels are also generally more expensive than conventional ice spinning reels. Fly line and fly backer must be put on before your ice line and those are not necessarily cheap either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another option for increasing the rate of line pick up would be to use a large arbor reel. The downside is that they are generally more expensive. The reel shown in the pic is an Okuma Sierra 2/3 (~$30-$40), for a little more (~$50) you can get an Okuma SLV. The arbor on this reel is quite a bit larger, and with 200yds of dacron backing, you will have a pick up rate which is considerably faster than the Sierra.

If you really wanted to get into very large arbor reels the price jumps way up, so for this, it would probably not be viable unless you wanted to get into fly fishing as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is attached with electrical tape. It is more difficult to get it on there than a spinning reel but it works alright.

OnAFly -

I looked at large arbor reels, and didn't like the idea of it. The reason for a smaller reel is so you can palm it easy to get the best jigging action. The one I have is actually a 4/5, and yes, quite cheap, but it gets the job done. At about 40 bucks though, it is more expensive than any spinning reel I have rigged on a ice rod, even more than my Tica Cetus reels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, I see. That makes sense. I used to have the same reel. I don't know how many times I dropped the thing while wading the streams. That thing was indestructible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey gadget,

I don't know if you are still fishing this year anymore. If you are you are more than welcome to try one of mine. If not next year for sure. I have 2 thorne bros. quiversticks with fly reels on em. You saw me using one in west bulls bay awhile back. Does it make a difference? Well put it this way. I have 7 new fly reels sitting on my table for the rest of my thorne rods for next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks duckman, may have to look into that for next year. I have put the stuff away for this year as I am heading up to duluth for work this week. See you on the open water in a couple of weeks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great idea. I've got several fly reels I rarely use and could do this with. One downside is that you have to feed line off the reel rather than just flipping the bail. But I hate the line twist I get on light line and small jigs. I'm definitely going to try this next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That downside is really a good side if you think about it though. By feeding line you are able to work the lure down the water column much easier than with a spinning reel. If I want, I can get a jig down on a fly reel just as fast as I can with a spinning reel. Just back the tension off completely and when jigging, palm the reel. Works great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Everyone is correct in saying that a converter is the way to go. When hooked up to shoreline or generator power, batteries are efficiently being charged while also providing clean 120v AC and 12v DC power. There may be an additional option to give you the best of both worlds though....   How many 120 v circuits are you planning on having? Is it safe to assume that everything will be on one? Assuming that you will be running a honda or similar 2000 watt inverter-style generator... One 15 amp circuit is about all you will be able to run. I am in the same boat as you are... I have quite a bit of battery capability on board and a generator... but would like to be able to run 120v without having the generator going. What I am thinking about doing is this....     Now... I haven't tried this yet and by no means am an electrician.. But my thought is that my single AC circuit that feeds my outlets would be wired to a male plug. The Line out from my converter would be wired to a household female plug.... And then there is the inverter which already has a female plug. Basically, I can choose which source I want to use to feed the outlets... either inverter or generator. There may be better ways to do this, such as a transfer or 3-way switch - but I think it would be nice to physically know where the power is coming from. To me, this is the easiest way to have the best of both worlds, while ensuring that aren't using your inverter to charge your batteries back through the converter. Any of ya smart guys see why this wouldn't work?
    • Maybe they just stop working as well as the alternatives.   That could be because (speculation on my part) that the organisms that a crawler harness or a crawler on a rig emulate or resemble become less abundant in the fall and minnows have grown to the point where they are attractive to the walleye.   So the walleye are no longer eating bugs or crayfish for example but have switched to minnows.  I do know, based on the writings of a number of people and personal experience, that crawlers lose effectiveness compared to minnows in the fall on Vermilion.   Likewise starting out in the spring, and gradually crawlers become more effective than minnows. 
    • in the fall for walleye. Seems everyone switches to cranks or jigs and minnows in fall. Is there a biological reason why people don't think walleye so will hit a crawler harness in the fall?  Even all articles regarding fall walleye fishing talk more about using cranks or big minnows and dismiss crawler harness use that time of year
    • Went for a nice walk in the woods Sunday. Got one out of two hours of walking. Flushed a few but too many leaves yet. There's birds out their but I think the cool, wet spring affected brood survival.  
    • I donated these shells this week to an outdoor organization. All 500 of 'em!
    • So, Sunday mid morning I'm in a pretty good Walleye bite, two fish from a limit. And I stop to run in and watch the Vikings game.  note to self: Get head examined this week!  No stringers-right!
    • Not sure but if you throw some drab paint on it-it's a Duck Boat!
    • If I were to go back it wouldn't even have been a question.  Hydraulic is definitely the answer.
    • Opening day for grouse in the arrowhead I missed 3 birds and did not shoot at 4 due flying low over Finn. It was foggy raining but I did see 4 moose and a big black wolf. According to my phone I hiked 10.7 miles. sunday started off cloudy but the sun came out. The first trail about 30 yards from the car Finn flushed a grouse it flies up and straight down the trail bang one for one. Finn flushed 3 more birds on that trail but never saw them. The next trail we were walking down a grouse flew down in front of us and the grouse tried to hide in the clover in the middle of the tire tracks. Finn flushed it and went straight up and landed in a tree. Haha dumb bird I made a nice head shot and Finn made the retrieve.   We put on 9.8 miles but I left my phone in the car on two trails. Finn flushed a few more birds but I never fired a shot as they were to low or never seen them. For grouse numbers as high as the dnr said they must not have a great hatch or something. I was hoping to get some young dumb birds for Finn but we did not find them.
  • Our Sponsors