Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
JohnK

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Review (many images)

6 posts in this topic

I've had this lens for a couple of months now and have used it everywhere from my yard to the zoo to shooting the Blue Angels from a boat. It is not as good as the Nikon 200-400 F/4 VR or 500mm VR, but it costs 1/6th to 1/8th as much as those lenses so that's to be expected. I've been shooting the Nikon 70-300VR, a very good consumer lens, for a couple of years now, The Sigma is a substantial step up in reach and a step up in image quality.

I have found that shooting at 500mm is not nearly as forgiving of being sloppy as shooting at 300mm. Even with image stabilization you really need to concentrate on good technique to get sharp photos shooting hand held.

Compared to the 300mm + F/2.8 or F/4 pro lenses it isn't all that large or heavy, but compared to the consumer 70-300 size lenses most of us are used to it's very large and heavy. It has an all metal body, and attracts attention anywhere you go. If you carry it in public be prepared for many comments about the size of the lens. This is built and finished just like Sigmas EX line of lenses. Apparently Sigma has decided that from now on only their fixed aperture lenses will bear the EX designation or I'm sure this would have it just like the 50-500 does.

I've tried it with a Kenko 1.4x teleconverter with poor results. The image quality with the Kenko was no better than cropping or up sizing the image, and with my particular TC/D80/Sigma it doesn't have a great connection, if I have auto focus enabled the camera reports a dead battery. So for me it's definitely manual focus only with the TC. Maybe the Sigma TC works better with it, for what the Sigma TC costs I'm willing to give it a try one of these days.

I'm satisfied with this lens, it hasn't stopped me from lusting after a 200-400, but it is a step towards it.

These shots are all at 500mm, the lens is sharper below 500 but who buys a 500 and doesn't want to use it at max reach? All of these except the flying eagle were hand held. The flying eagle was shot from a very loose tripod with a ball head to pan and track it in flight, that shot is also approximately a 50% crop.

Here it is attached to a Nikon D80 with battery grip:

P1040224.JPG

This is not an ideal comparison as the shots were taken on different days and the wind was blowing more on the day the sigma shot, but does give you a general idea of the difference in magnification between 500mm and 300mm, and an idea of the sharpness difference between these particular lenses. 100% crops:

Sigma_vs_Nikon.jpg

DSC_9957_Gray_Wolf_Fixed.jpg

DSC_8657.jpg

DSC_9113.JPG

DSC_9434.JPG

DSC_8935.JPG

Another Blue Angels shot coming head on:

http://lh4.ggpht.com/john.knutson/SJKMLsM3u4I/AAAAAAAAEuA/R8ZUtFXGzQ0/s800/DSC_8950.JPG

1/250th @ 500mm

DSC_8578.JPG

100% crop of the ducks foot

Duck_Foot_Crop.jpg

OS is quite effective. This isn't the sharpest shot I've ever taken, but it was hand held at 1/50th @ 500mm. Viewed at 100% you can count his whiskers:

DSC_8510.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John, great review. Thanks for taking the time to help everyone out with that. You've got some sweet photographs there! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks John. That was a great review. I all but pulled the trigger on one because I was having focus issues with my 170-500mm Sigma. Now that I got that fixed ( thanks Steve), I'll wait but at least I have something to compare now.

Great shots. Have fun with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone, if anyone is considering this lens I hope it helps, or helps them spend the big bucks for the pro glass - always glad to help someone else spend money! smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We live in some sort of Bizarro world now - Sarah Palin calling Trump sinfully stupid.     Here's another one from Ann Coulter, who literally wrote a book "In Trump We Trust"    
    • You do realize that if the taxes were done that way, the cities would get $2.53 billion richer, and rural areas would get $2.53 billion poorer. The 7 county metro pays substantially more taxes (nearly 2/3 of the states total) than the other 80 counties in Minnesota combined, but only receives roughly half of the state expenditures.   Sorry to break it to you, but rural America is not fiscally solvent. Those citiots you speak of are bankrolling the entire country. It's easy to see on this chart: more urban states are to the left (givers) and more rural states are to the right (takers).  
    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
  • Our Sponsors