Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
JohnK

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Review (many images)

6 posts in this topic

I've had this lens for a couple of months now and have used it everywhere from my yard to the zoo to shooting the Blue Angels from a boat. It is not as good as the Nikon 200-400 F/4 VR or 500mm VR, but it costs 1/6th to 1/8th as much as those lenses so that's to be expected. I've been shooting the Nikon 70-300VR, a very good consumer lens, for a couple of years now, The Sigma is a substantial step up in reach and a step up in image quality.

I have found that shooting at 500mm is not nearly as forgiving of being sloppy as shooting at 300mm. Even with image stabilization you really need to concentrate on good technique to get sharp photos shooting hand held.

Compared to the 300mm + F/2.8 or F/4 pro lenses it isn't all that large or heavy, but compared to the consumer 70-300 size lenses most of us are used to it's very large and heavy. It has an all metal body, and attracts attention anywhere you go. If you carry it in public be prepared for many comments about the size of the lens. This is built and finished just like Sigmas EX line of lenses. Apparently Sigma has decided that from now on only their fixed aperture lenses will bear the EX designation or I'm sure this would have it just like the 50-500 does.

I've tried it with a Kenko 1.4x teleconverter with poor results. The image quality with the Kenko was no better than cropping or up sizing the image, and with my particular TC/D80/Sigma it doesn't have a great connection, if I have auto focus enabled the camera reports a dead battery. So for me it's definitely manual focus only with the TC. Maybe the Sigma TC works better with it, for what the Sigma TC costs I'm willing to give it a try one of these days.

I'm satisfied with this lens, it hasn't stopped me from lusting after a 200-400, but it is a step towards it.

These shots are all at 500mm, the lens is sharper below 500 but who buys a 500 and doesn't want to use it at max reach? All of these except the flying eagle were hand held. The flying eagle was shot from a very loose tripod with a ball head to pan and track it in flight, that shot is also approximately a 50% crop.

Here it is attached to a Nikon D80 with battery grip:

P1040224.JPG

This is not an ideal comparison as the shots were taken on different days and the wind was blowing more on the day the sigma shot, but does give you a general idea of the difference in magnification between 500mm and 300mm, and an idea of the sharpness difference between these particular lenses. 100% crops:

Sigma_vs_Nikon.jpg

DSC_9957_Gray_Wolf_Fixed.jpg

DSC_8657.jpg

DSC_9113.JPG

DSC_9434.JPG

DSC_8935.JPG

Another Blue Angels shot coming head on:

http://lh4.ggpht.com/john.knutson/SJKMLsM3u4I/AAAAAAAAEuA/R8ZUtFXGzQ0/s800/DSC_8950.JPG

1/250th @ 500mm

DSC_8578.JPG

100% crop of the ducks foot

Duck_Foot_Crop.jpg

OS is quite effective. This isn't the sharpest shot I've ever taken, but it was hand held at 1/50th @ 500mm. Viewed at 100% you can count his whiskers:

DSC_8510.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John, great review. Thanks for taking the time to help everyone out with that. You've got some sweet photographs there! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info John. You answered all my questions and then some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks John. That was a great review. I all but pulled the trigger on one because I was having focus issues with my 170-500mm Sigma. Now that I got that fixed ( thanks Steve), I'll wait but at least I have something to compare now.

Great shots. Have fun with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice comprehensive review John.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone, if anyone is considering this lens I hope it helps, or helps them spend the big bucks for the pro glass - always glad to help someone else spend money! smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I am more baffled by the people who think the far right and far left are somehow different and not capable of ignorant acts. Like somehow or somewhere the extremists of your party are somehow better than the extremists of the other, hopefully some people are having their eyes opened.

      Even better there are those out there that think if only the left/right could take over and make things they way they are "suppose" to be would suddenly fix everything. Like alienating half the country is going to be good for America. The further the country gets torn in half the more it looks like there is only one place to to go and that is back to the middle where people work together. Of course that would put a lot of the media out of work but it is more clear than ever they are more of a hazzard than anything.
    • If I remember correctly Ted Cruz did call him a pathological liar during the primaries.
    • How anybody can believe any word that comes out of that pumpkin pie hole is beyond me.   Y'all got duped by a compulsive liar. At least he has that part of being a politician down pat, but for it to work ya need to slip some truth in there now and again.
    • And yet?   Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump Jan 21 A fantastic day and evening in Washington D.C.Thank you to @FoxNews and so many other news outlets for the GREAT reviews of the speech!
    • I find it amusing to watch Fox slowly come to grips with the realization that a war against the media impacts them too.   They are completely gobsmacked over the crowd size press conference. As we all should be. How embarrassing.
    • Totally agree!
    • He got 3 quick ones off  before Conway took away his phone and tweeted the last one herself.   https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc^appleosx|twcamp^safari|twgr^profile
    • I got out with my old man for about 3 hours. Fished 18 to 21 feet of water used maki mino or wax worms. Caught some bigger gills over 8 inches up to 9 and 5/8ths those fish were released! 
  • Our Sponsors