Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mforce

Mn Archery Regulations

9 posts in this topic

Anyone know why the changes in Reg's for archery hunting in Mn this year? I can only shoot a buck in my zone? I'm in 284. I always try to shoot a buck anyway, but it's nice knowing I can take a doe late in the season if I get skunked on the buck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its got a lot to do with the dnr's counts being different than years past. more or less on the short end. my zone, 240, went from intensive harvest since it began to managed. I think its got a lot to do with people fibbing on their registration, or not doing it at all. I haven't been asked to show a deer while registering one in the past 4 years, and I've done about 10 deer in that time.

but isn't archery still either sex, regardless of the zone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...but isn't archery still either sex, regardless of the zone?

nope, not in the 'Youth' areas.

Check out page 82 of the regs for the reason why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know why the changes in Reg's for archery hunting in Mn this year? I can only shoot a buck in my zone? I'm in 284. I always try to shoot a buck anyway, but it's nice knowing I can take a doe late in the season if I get skunked on the buck.

284 is one of those poster children as to why it's mostly bucks only in some areas. In 2008, there were 30 doe permits and 125 antlerless deer were killed. Youth hunters registered 62 of them and archers tagged 17. The change was made because lowering antlerless permits wasn't lowering doe harvest because there were too many exceptions (youth, archery, muzzleloader, disabled permittees). In some cases, lowering permits actually made the problem worse. The 2008 harvest data for lottery areas is posted on page 14 of this file:

2009 Deer Season Information

Take a look at that data and cross check it against the areas that are youth antlerless only (yellow) and you'll understand why it was changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting that, it was very informative. Some of the numbers are unreal, 196%, 363%, 503% success rate's on antlerless deer!?!?! How does that happen??? I for one am glad to see these changes. Back in the day, when bowhunter success was relatively low to the amount of total deer harvested, and people had to choose between regular firearms and Muzzy I am guessing the added does was neglagable. Now like you said when you figure all of the "added" doe's, youth, handicap, plus archers and muzzle loaders, it adds up.

Now when you say 150 doe's, you are going to get "about" 150 doe's, not 400. I still think it is going to be hard to police the "youth only" doe tag, I feel there will still be a lot of dads drilling jr.'s doe at 7:15am on opening morning. (not that I hold a grudge wink )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting that, it was very informative. Some of the numbers are unreal, 196%, 363%, 503% success rate's on antlerless deer!?!?! How does that happen??? I for one am glad to see these changes. Back in the day, when bowhunter success was relatively low to the amount of total deer harvested, and people had to choose between regular firearms and Muzzy I am guessing the added does was neglagable. Now like you said when you figure all of the "added" doe's, youth, handicap, plus archers and muzzle loaders, it adds up.

Now when you say 150 doe's, you are going to get "about" 150 doe's, not 400. I still think it is going to be hard to police the "youth only" doe tag, I feel there will still be a lot of dads drilling jr.'s doe at 7:15am on opening morning. (not that I hold a grudge wink )

Percent success is the number of antlerless deer taken in relation to available permits. Those high percentages are my point exactly in that it became impossible to regulate antlerless take with all the exceptions. Since the law allows for bucks only with limited youth permits, the change was made in those 12 areas that were the worst. You make a good point regarding policing the youth tags. If you look at how many are available, it's very low because we figured 100% success on all those tags. In other words, we didn't offer a bunch of tags figuring only 50% will be filled. They'll all be filled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet if we didn't have a venison donation program, that many does wouldn't be getting whacked. heck, if ya ask me, too many people shoot,shoot, and keep shooting, until they realize how many deer they have. then they donate deer, because they don't want to pay to process it all.

I think they(dnr) should issue a tag for a venison donation deer at 50 bucks a piece, on top of the 13 bucks for an intensive harvest tag. that would help pay for processing, and maybe contribute some much needed funds for a much needed cause. and, I bet not some many does get smoked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back when everyone in regular firearms (including youth) was bucks only unless you drew a permit, archers and muzzy hunters were still allowed to still take does. However you could not hunt regular firearms season and muzzy. You had to chose. This limited muzzy hunters and therefore their impact. Most hunters won't give up regular firearms to muzzy hunt. Why not reinstate having to choose between muzzy and regular firearms? As it is now the trophy buck hunter can still enjoy alot of opportunity but the kid starting to hunt and goes muzzy or archery has to pass on their first deer if all they see are does and they don't draw a permit. Stats mentioned earlier show poster child area 284 lists 30 youth antlerless permits were available in 2008. Total of 62 youth antlerless harvested/registered. 2 were archery (3.2%) and 2 were muzzy (3.2%). 58 were reg firearms (93.5%). Sounds like archery youth antlerless and muzzy youth antlerless are a small factor in the equation. I don't know what impact adult antlerless archery and adult antlerless muzzy harvest had in those areas. If adult antlerless muzzy is a significant factor then why not restrict their numbers. Give the trophy hunter the buck only all season license so he can muzzy the bucks and the kid who choses archery or muzzy only can shot anything he wants. Still get license sales but more people get to pursue/take what they want. May be I am missing a piece of the puzzle, but it sounds like its a regular firearms problem and archery and muzzy is paying the price. Let me know where my thinking is off.

Kids have the bows out and targets up so I gotta go!

Lakevet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good points about how enabling hunters to hunt both firearms and muzzy without making everyone apply for doe permits in certain areas has led to too many does being harvested.

While in other areas the hunters need all the time they can get to harvest as many deer as they can.

So I'm thinking allowing us to hunt all seasons, but making everyone apply for doe permits in the lottery areas is a great way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We need the real German RH1 here. He would pick them out Pronto!
    • In the end, LMIT met his karmic retribution when he got kicked in the head by a mule and came back as D2E. 
    •   Attached is what you can get with the $40 package with SlingTV. Looks like they have history but not discovery. They also have $20 and $25 packages. The only thing I watched with any regularity when I had it was ESPN so I dropped it. 
    • I'm also a moderator, and just about to shut your  garbage mouth posts down. Go get yourself an education, which you still have not provided proof of, and never will,  because there IS nothing to provide. You are nothing but an  ill-advised rabble rouser. There is no room here for your continual name calling and personal attacks/bashing.  I will warn you now to go read the rules of the site before your name-calling posts start to disappear in entirety.
    • Well said Del! There weren't issues till he decided to stick his nose in it. The mod for that thread did just fine.
    • I meant harmless in the sense they don't kill fish. With that being said, I'm sure the host fish would prefer that it not have a lamprey attached to it, but at the end of the day, the fish will live...literally. Lampreys are very common in the upper St. Croix River system. I see them attached to redhorse all the time, which makes sense, as redhorse are by far the most abundant fish in the system. If the lampreys haven't "crashed" that system after several thousand years of coexistence, I'm liking gamefishes' chances for the next several thousand years also 
    • John Podesta May Have Violated Federal Law By Not Disclosing 75,000 Stock Shares 3/26/2017 Daily Caller   John Podesta, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 national campaign chairman, may have violated federal law by failing to disclose the receipt of 75,000 shares of stock from a Kremlin-financed company when he joined the Obama White House in 2014, according to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group. Joule Unlimited Technologies — financed in part by a Russian firm —  originally awarded Podesta 100,000 shares of stock options when in 2010 he joined that board along with its Dutch-based entities: Joule Global Holdings, BV and the Stichting Joule Global Foundation. When Podesta announced his departure from the Joule board in January 2014 to become President Obama’s special counsellor, the company officially issued him 75,000 common shares of stock. The Schedule B section of the federal government’s form 278 which — requires financial disclosures for government officials — required Podesta to “report any purchase, sale or exchange by you, your spouse, or dependent children…of any property, stocks, bonds, commodity futures and other securities when the amount of the transaction exceeded $1,000.”   Podesta’s form 278 Schedule B is blank regarding his receipt of any stock from any company. Liberals and conservatives alike tell TheDCNF Podesta should have disclosed the stock. “Well Podesta should certainly have been more upfront in filling this out.  Clearly, it should have been fully disclosed,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the liberal group Public Citizen which was founded by Ralph Nader.  “That’s the point of the personal financial disclosure forms, especially for anyone entering the White House,” he told TheDCNF in an interview. “If the transfer of stock took place, it had to be disclosed,” added former U.S. Attorney Joseph DiGenova in an interview. “If he didn’t, clearly it’s a violation.”   OH, MY...   And there is soo much more to this story...   Absolute criminals...   Link
    • Schumer goes off on Trump supporter at NYC restaurant, witness says Published March 27, 2017 New York Post   Witness: Schumer went off on Trump supporter at restaurant Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., caused a scene at a Manhattan restaurant when he began yelling at a wealthy and well-connected Donald Trump supporter that the POTUS is “a liar.” Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, lost his cool on Sunday night at Upper East Side restaurant Sette Mezzo, according to witnesses. He was dining with friends when he encountered Joseph A. Califano Jr. — the former U.S. secretary of health, education and welfare under President Jimmy Carter and domestic policy adviser to President Lyndon B. Johnson — and his wife, Hilary, who were having a quiet dinner. Onlookers said Schumer was incensed that Hilary — the daughter of William S. Paley, the founder and chairman of CBS — had voted for Trump, even though her husband, Joseph, is a well-known Democrat. One witness said of the restaurant rant, “They are a highly respected couple, and Schumer made a scene, yelling, ‘She voted for Trump!’ The Califanos left the restaurant, but Schumer followed them outside.” On the sidewalk, Schumer carried on with his fantastical filibuster: “ ‘How could you vote for Trump? He’s a liar!’ He kept repeating, ‘He’s a liar!’ ” Hilary confirmed the confrontation, telling Page Six, “Sen. Schumer was really rude . . . He’s our senator, and I don’t really like him. Yes, I voted for Trump. Schumer joined us outside and he told me Trump was a liar. I should have told him that Hillary Clinton was a liar, but I was so surprised I didn’t say anything.”   Sheezus....   What an unhinged lunatic a-hole....   Could you imagine if this had been paul ryan acting in this way ??   I think a knee to the groin was in order..
  • Our Sponsors