Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott M

Saw some Huns yesterday

10 posts in this topic

I've only seen them twice in this state, and never while carrying a gun. Anybody see many of them? Anyone see any this year? Why are their numbers always so scarce?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have seen some this year. One brood had 14 chicks in it. Have seen more this year than in the past but nothing compared to the late eighties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see a covey of huns every once in a great while. Not nearly as much as I'd like to, however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've talked to a few fellas in the southern portion of the state that have huns on their prviate land. I've never run into them on public though. I do pretty well in the Dakota's on them some years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to see them back in the 70's in S. MN occasionally. I see them a lot more out in S. Central N. Dak (Along the Mo)where I hunt Phez and Sharpies. I'd say in MN the loss of large expanses of cover and way too many Skunks, Yotees and Fox could have some impact.

They're great eating, though when you get a few to make a meal. They're like a little bonus you get Hunting that makes the top of list for trip highlights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bump at least one group every year hunting private stuff in SW MN. Couple of years ago, I ran into some in Sibley county which really had me scratching my head. Wish there were more around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw the huns again today in the exact same spot. Must not range too far then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally speaking I believe Huns have a fairly small home range. Back in the late 70s and early 80s we had a lot of Huns in the area. We would kick up the same covey in the same fence line a few times each year and from one year to the next. It wasn't unusual to see 8 to 12 coveys a day. Most of the time they had anywhere from 12 to 30 birds in each covey. I miss having those little buggers around in decent numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with koonie. The huns that we do see are in the same areas that we saw them twenty odd years ago just not as many. There home range is pretty small. A covey will keep showing up in the same general area over and over again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We had a patch of grass we could walk every year to get a nice covey rise out of. We could hit it more than once, every year, for many, many years. That was back in the late 80's and early 90's when we had them running through our yard and picking our berries often in the mornings. We still see quite a few in NW MN every year, but not huge numbers. SW MN we see at least a covey or two every single trip down, often in the same areas as the year before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors