Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Lens damage?


finnbay

Recommended Posts

My Mark II and 300mm took a nasty fall the night of the eclipse. I've been desperate to test it out to see how it is working. Seems to be fine, but sometimes I worry that I'm trying to gloss over something that might be there. Can anyone see anything in these photos that would indicate a lens problem? Operator problems go without saying! grin.gif Thanks!

lens-test-1.jpg

Lens-test-2.jpg

Lens-test-3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what I would be looking for as far as lens damage goes but the pictures are great. I really like the first one, its pose and sitting on the birch tree is really nice. I also like the background on the chickadee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay, that's part of the problem. I'm not sure what I should be looking for either. If the fall hadn't been enough to cause the 1.4 that was attached to explode, I probably wouldn't be worrying. Oh, well. It seems to be okay. Thanks for the kind words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a 300/2.8 shot to me! Seriously I don't see anything amiss here Ken. Your sports shots should certainly will give you any clue on servo tracking and back focus or front focus issues. I have a focus chart I use to check for some of those things as well so if you want it let me know. Have you ordered a 1.4TC yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken, these images look sharp and fine. I'd be worried about sharpness, speed of focus, and ability to retain focus on high-speed subjects in Al servo mode, as well as whether the lens' IS makes any new and special noises. Maybe get the dogs outside or take the combo to the nearest snowmobile trail to test it out on sledders coming toward you.

You could try to get pics of me running full blast toward you but THAT wouldn't be much of a test of Al servo and the lens/camera, as slow as I run. grin.gifgrin.gif

If it passes those tests, I'd say camera and lens are fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan, plan on ordering later tonight. I had a Kenko Pro300 before but plan on going with the Canon this time. Seems to hold focus okay - bounced a little between the chickadees and the background but at 10 to 12 feet some of that can be expected. Had a pretty good number of sharp shots, but these were the only decent poses. My photo opportunities this weekend are inside, slow motion. Won't get a chance to shoot some sports until a basketball game Tuesday. I'm holding my breath. Steve, don't laugh - I may take you up on that. At least I'll have a good sized target to focus on! grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: finnbay
At least I'll have a good sized target to focus on! grin.gif

Ken, you're a BAD man! whistle.gif

Didn't know you were using the Kenko. I used that model TC for awhile and liked it, but I'm pretty sure the Canon has a much better built quality. Guess that Kenko failed the "Hupila Tested Tough" test. You might say it was eclipsed by frigid temps and rough treatment. grin.gifgrin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.