I have a humminbird 797 and it doesn't graph fish very well if at all...I have a lowrance 334 on the bow and it shows almost perfect arcs that make distinguishing fish and rocks and weeds very easy. I ran a test by watching both units simultaneously at the same settings, the lowrance graphed fish with perfect arcs 6" to 2 feet off bottom, it showed a school of baitfish with small arcs by it which were smaller perch feeding, the humminbird was showing small straight lines which didn't look anything like fish, it looked more like a small clump of weeds, and it didn't graph the school of baitfish that the lowrance did either.
Any thoughts? I have the sensitivity all the way up and chart speed up around 80%. It seems that even though the sensitivity is all the way it could still go up more.
The lowrance unit appears to be much better at showing bottom definition and differentiating between structure, as well as the fish graphing thing.
Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday.
What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures.
Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets. Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome. You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.
24V 80lb. 60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat. They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to
not being the anchor person any more). With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely
that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing.
I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the
new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
Dang, new content and now answers.
First, congrats on the new boat!
My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V. 80 might be tops? I’m partial to MinnKota.
How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.
All weather or just nice weather?
Casting a lot or bait dragging?
Bobber or panfish fishing?
Spot lock? Networked with depth finders? What brand of depth finders?
Question
zachp
I have a humminbird 797 and it doesn't graph fish very well if at all...I have a lowrance 334 on the bow and it shows almost perfect arcs that make distinguishing fish and rocks and weeds very easy. I ran a test by watching both units simultaneously at the same settings, the lowrance graphed fish with perfect arcs 6" to 2 feet off bottom, it showed a school of baitfish with small arcs by it which were smaller perch feeding, the humminbird was showing small straight lines which didn't look anything like fish, it looked more like a small clump of weeds, and it didn't graph the school of baitfish that the lowrance did either.
Any thoughts? I have the sensitivity all the way up and chart speed up around 80%. It seems that even though the sensitivity is all the way it could still go up more.
The lowrance unit appears to be much better at showing bottom definition and differentiating between structure, as well as the fish graphing thing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts