I have a humminbird 797 and it doesn't graph fish very well if at all...I have a lowrance 334 on the bow and it shows almost perfect arcs that make distinguishing fish and rocks and weeds very easy. I ran a test by watching both units simultaneously at the same settings, the lowrance graphed fish with perfect arcs 6" to 2 feet off bottom, it showed a school of baitfish with small arcs by it which were smaller perch feeding, the humminbird was showing small straight lines which didn't look anything like fish, it looked more like a small clump of weeds, and it didn't graph the school of baitfish that the lowrance did either.
Any thoughts? I have the sensitivity all the way up and chart speed up around 80%. It seems that even though the sensitivity is all the way it could still go up more.
The lowrance unit appears to be much better at showing bottom definition and differentiating between structure, as well as the fish graphing thing.
Question
zachp
I have a humminbird 797 and it doesn't graph fish very well if at all...I have a lowrance 334 on the bow and it shows almost perfect arcs that make distinguishing fish and rocks and weeds very easy. I ran a test by watching both units simultaneously at the same settings, the lowrance graphed fish with perfect arcs 6" to 2 feet off bottom, it showed a school of baitfish with small arcs by it which were smaller perch feeding, the humminbird was showing small straight lines which didn't look anything like fish, it looked more like a small clump of weeds, and it didn't graph the school of baitfish that the lowrance did either.
Any thoughts? I have the sensitivity all the way up and chart speed up around 80%. It seems that even though the sensitivity is all the way it could still go up more.
The lowrance unit appears to be much better at showing bottom definition and differentiating between structure, as well as the fish graphing thing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts