john skarie Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Well Merk if your honest opinion was that 2+2= 5 how far do you think you would get with that?Saying the slots don't make a difference is pretty much like trying to tell people the above is true.You aren't advocating managing a fishery for the fish you want it managed for you.Big difference.Funny how you throw this PETA comparison around all the time now.Guess when you run out of things to say that make sense, or even based on facts you go with the PETA card.JS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishin_Jacks7 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Fill out the survey and hopefully you are voting for more muskie lakes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St_Croix_Banks Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Merk-The sad thing is that as we fishermen continue to fight amongst ourselves PETA wins, without even lifting a finger. Ummm...How does PETA win in this situation? PETA really has nothing to do with this debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingfish689 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I one side makes four comments about how the other side is not treating fish ethicly . and they come back with three comments about how the other is not treating fish ethicly . That gives peta 7 peices of ammo to use against both groups on how they are not treating fish ethicly.I would not have thought that needed to be explaned but there you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St_Croix_Banks Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 7 pieces of ammo? Not really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john skarie Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 So we throw talking about ethics in hunting and fishing out the window because somebody is afraid of what peta will think??I guess no more talking about taking clean shots while deer hunting, or don't keep fish out of the water to long so they have a better chance to survive??Seriously?JS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingfish689 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I did not say we should not talk about these things . only that I am not naive enough to think groups like peta are sitting out in boats taking notes when they can do that from thier living rooms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john skarie Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Then let them take notes. Just because peta thinks hunting and fishing should be outlawed doesn't mean we can't live our lives without being in fear of them.To stiffle discussions about ethics in hunting and fishing because of fear of a group that has a black and white view of the world is self-defeating.That is not how any of us should live our lives if for nothing else out of respect for the resource.JS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now