Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Musky Buck

Old Zone 4

6 posts in this topic

More a question than a topic maybe but I'm not remembering why this changed to zone 2 ? I'd like to hear some input into the positives and the negatives of the change for you in your hunting area and if you prefer the new 9 day season vs the old 2 day, 4 day, or multi-zone buck tags. I thought the old zone 4 allowed for hunters to pick almost the style by which you hunted. Seemed to put 3 days less pressure on them, split up the hunters a bit, and yet if it was mature buck or bust kind of guys they had the 6 days to try that route. I understand if this 9 day season is working well for you your in favor and if not you're not. Things like noticing more nocturnal deer, maybe now instead of some parties being done after the 1st weekend they are now hunting the whole 9 days, extra days to do deer drives and buy up more bonus tags, that's a whole nuther ? how many buy bonus permits, some reports from you would be greatly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it has its good points and bad points. I think it has helped the population issue by allowing people more time to get that extra doe, on the other side it gives people more days to get that extra buck and I think that is a huge reason why I have been seeing fewer mature bucks each year. Back when it was a 2 day hunt I would usually see 3 or 4 mature bucks each year (most during the bow season) and now I am still seeing about the same number of bucks but a majority are yearlings, why dont these yearlings seem to grow up? I dont know I doubt all of them get shot but I guess its possible and there has got to be some reason why 75% of the bucks I see are yearlings since the change. I think less people are doing deer drives now at least in my area because before you only had 2 days to get your deer so you did everything you could to try and get them but now people seem to sit more because they have all week for something to walk by their stand. I think it is very popular with people who strickly rifle hunt because they get more time to hunt and who doesnt want to hunt more. But for people like me who mainly just bow hunt I think would like to see it the way it was. Has anybody else been seeing less mature bucks and more 1.5 and 2.5 year olds since we switched to 9 day or is it just me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally like it better, as it gives me some week nights to hunt some marginal places around my folks place that I always wanted to hunt growing up, but couldn't justify the time in such a short season. I don't shoot any more deer than I was, but a few more might be shot in different places.

It seems to me that there are more small bucks, but we never saw many mature ones anyway.

I think the # of bonus tags going down in the areas as they need it to stabilizes the population just fine, at least around here. There are less deer than there were, but there's still plenty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree guys, I liked the old zone 4 a lot mainly because the deer had 5 days inbetween to get back on routine and it allowed those bucks that made weekend # 1 some breeding and rutting time and to not be almost totally nocturnal by the second weekend. I think it may have helped some bucks make it through the season because once 1st weekend was done some lands became almost a refuge of sorts. I guess basically instead of 4 hunts, or 8 hunts or multizone 12 hunts, we now can have 18 hunts meaning morning and evening plus more scheming and time to do drives and if all fails 16 musket days or a possible 32 more hunts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why I asked the ? is because the change has been to old zone 4 where old zone 1 and 2 the boundaries have been the same and the season length, although they added the zone north of HWY 10 to zone 2 3 seasons ago. Just trying to figure out some stuff as to why I'm noticing a much more nocturnal herd, I know the season isn't the only reason and most seasons it seems they get more nocturnal each day which makes sense and that is part of why deer drives happens, if they were running around during shooting hours with high frequency drives would make little sense. The part I can't figure out is I have areas that are left alone until rifle opener, no grouse,pheasant, bow and arrow ducks or geese, no traffic to bother them yet they are still waiting to come out after dark, maybe this fall will be different, time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a purely anecdotal observation:

Last year, on Friday (Day 7 of the season) we had 25 deer in a hay field in the middle of our hunting land well before dark. In the middle of the bunch was a big ol' wide 12 pointer chasing does like crazy. By the time I saw them, it was pretty dark so all I could do was watch, but what a spectacle!

So at least in this one location for this one year, they did get back to normal during the season.

No, we never got the 12 pointer, lucky dog that he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
    • After doing a little looking there are a lot of options to these things. Anyone know how that new V6 compares to the in line 6? Some of the stuff I would like is the bigger tires and because I would consider putting a plow on it a lower rear end gear. The Dana 44 rear axel would be nice and would want a hard and soft top. I'm in no hurry to get one so Ill wait till the right one comes around. There are a lot of them out there that never leave the tar. More options in the later models as far as transmissions to. So it also comes down to how much I want to spend on one and how late of a model to buy. Sure don't want to spend 35K on a new one.
    • Well yeah but can you name a vehicle built for off road including any domestic pickup truck that doesn't have issues with rust. Fenders, rockers, frames etc. If you play in the mud and salt you need to maintain them. UTVs are no different. Ask yourself why Polaris would put the air filter canister intake in the rear wheel well so it is sucking in the air from the dustiest area they could possibly draw it from resulting in a 4k bill when the motor grenades.    Jeeps are fun, used ones can be had at a reasonable price but by their nature you need to be careful when you purchase because if the previous owner drove them the way they were marketed then they may have some issues.   But the aftermarket has an amazing amount of mods,upgrades and accessories to make your Jeep into anything you want and because the generally go 10 years between major design changes there are a large number of parts available if you need them.     
    • Anyfish it's still points and way better than a zero for points! Congrats on the fine eating bird.
  • Our Sponsors